Quantcast
Channel: admin
Viewing all 3780 articles
Browse latest View live

BAKIT SIMBANG GABI ANG TAWAG SA MISA PAG MADALING ARAW? By Katolikong Pinoy


ARJON PAUL DELA PAZ: NALIWANAGAN MULA SA PANLOLOKO NG MGA BORN AGAIN

$
0
0
The Church of Rome visible amid the thick fog

The Church of Rome visible amid the thick fog

Catholics – Born Again: OPEN FORUM

 

This my short story.

I was born and baptised as catholic. Marami akong nagiging kaibigan na born again until now. Maganda ang samahan nmin isinasama nila ako sa prayer meeting nila. Nagustuhan ko ung kantahan at uri ng pagsamba nila. Actually they are good very kind lalo na kung bgo ka sa church nila. Matagal tagal din akong sumama sa kanila. Wala pa akong alam sa doktrina kaya mabilis akong napapaniwala sa kanilang aral. Marami silang tanong sa mga katoliko na may pang uusig. Halos kamuntikan na akong maconvert sa kanilang samahan. Naliwanagan lang ako nung nagtanong ako sa isang hgh school classmate ko na solid catolic. Masami sa kaklase nun ay mga BA. Pnagkaisahan nila ito at nung time naUN pnagtatawanan nmin xa. Nakikisali pa ako pero mejo napahanga ako sa kanya na kht mag isa lng sya di sya nagpatalo. Dun ako naging curious sa pagiging katoliko ko. Marami pa pala akong di alam nun.

Sinubukan kong magtanong sa pari tungkol sa mga rebulto. Ang unang ktanungan ksi ng mga BA ay bkit daw snasamba ang rebulto? na malabo pa para sa akin. Ito’y ipinaliwanag nya at dun palang nasagot na ang aking katanungan. Di nagtagal nabuksan ang aking isipan na nililigaw lang pala ako ng mga pastor dahil kahit sila rin pala ay naliligaw. Kulang rin sila sa kaalaman ng kasaysayan ng simbahan at mga early christians. Kasi they only base in the bible. they not accept the history and tradition. Walang apostolic succesion ang mga BA. Paano silang maituturing na totoo? Mismo sa aking pagsasalik i discover the TRUTH and the truth is in the CATHOLIC CHURCH.

I pray na maliwanagan din ang mga BA na mabuksan ang kanilang isip at puso.

‪#‎seekyefirstthekingdomofGod

Judge Says Daly City Pastor to Stand Trial for Molesting Little Girl By Brian Shields

$
0
0

Kron

DALY CITY (KRON) — There is enough evidence to try a Daly City preacher on child molestation charges, a judge has ruled.

70-year old Venije Singkoh is pleading not guilty to the charge that he had inappropriate sexual contact with a nine-year old girl whose parents attend the Indonesian Pentecostal Foursquare Church in San Francisco.

The judge threw out two other charges concerning Singkoh’s alleged kisses on the cheeks of children at the church.

Back in February, a nine-year old girl came forward to say the Pastor had put his hands in her lap and kissed her repeatedly.

Singkoh is due back in court on January 9th. He remains free on a $100,000 bond.

FULL CREDITS TO:Kron2

Is Jesus Christ not God because it was written that He is a man in John 8:40 and 1 Timothy 2:5? Part 1

$
0
0
But now you are trying to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God; Abraham did not do this.  (John 8:40)

But now you are trying to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God; Abraham did not do this. (John 8:40)

John 8:40 along with 1 Timothy 2:5 are the favorite verses of the Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) to deny Jesus Christ is God.

Jesus said:

  • “But now you are trying to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God; Abraham did not do this.” (Jn 8:40, New American Bible)

Paul said:

  • For there is one God. There is also one mediator between God and the human race, Christ Jesus, himself human, (1Tm 2:5, NAB)

According to the perverted teaching of the INC, Jesus Christ admitted he is only a man and not God in John 8:40 and that Paul preaches the same in 1Timothy 2:5.  But if you scrutinize the said verses, neither Jesus Christ nor Paul said Jesus Christ is not God.  They are simply stating the fact that Jesus Christ is a man during His brief stint on earth as a man, that is, in the form of a human being.

To the INC, the whole content of the Bible rests on John 8:40 and 1 Timothy 2:5 (the latter to be discussed in another article) so they can push their false teaching that Jesus Christ is not God but only a man.

Just because Jesus Christ was said to be a man in John 8:40 and in 1Timothy 2:5, the INC disregarded the rest of the Scriptures that says He is God in the flesh (See the numerous Biblical testimonies below that says Jesus Christ is truly God in the flesh).

Every Christians that do not belong to the Arian cults (INC, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, etc.) accepts and believes that Jesus Christ is indeed a man because He is the God who became Man according to John 1:1-14, in this wise:

  • Before anything else existed, there was Christ, with God. He has always been alive and is himself God. He created everything there is—nothing exists that he didn’t make. Eternal life is in him, and this life gives light to all mankind.  His life is the light that shines through the darkness—and the darkness can never extinguish it.  God sent John the Baptist as a witness to the fact that Jesus Christ is the true Light.  John himself was not the Light; he was only a witness to identify it.  Later on, the one who is the true Light arrived to shine on everyone coming into the world.  But although he made the world, the world didn’t recognize him when he came.  Even in his own land and among his own people, the Jews, he was not accepted. Only a few would welcome and receive him. But to all who received him, he gave the right to become children of God. All they needed to do was to trust him to save them.   All those who believe this are reborn!—not a physical rebirth resulting from human passion or plan—but from the will of God.  And Christ became a human being and lived here on earth among us and was full of loving forgiveness and truth. And some of us have seen his glory—the glory of the only Son of the heavenly Father!  (Jn 1:1-14, The Living Bible)

With that passage alone, the false teaching of INC is flushed in the toilet bowl and straight into the septic tank where it belongs.

According to the Bible Jesus Christ is truly God in the flesh:

  1. Colossians 2:9 in different English Translations:
  • For in him dwells the whole fullness of the deity bodily, (NAB)
  • God lives fully in Christ. (Contemporary English Version)
  • I say this because all of God lives in Christ fully, even in his life on earth. (Easy-to-Read Version)
  • All of God lives fully in Christ [For in him all the fullness of deity dwells] in a human body [bodily; embodied], (Expanded Bible)
  • All of God lives in Christ’s body, (GOD’S WORD Translation)
  • For in Christ there is all of God in a human body; (The Living Bible)
  • All of God lives in Christ’s body, (Names of God Bible)
  • All of God lives fully in Christ (even when Christ was on earth), (New Century Version)
  • God’s whole nature is living in Christ in human form. (New International Reader’s Version)
  • For Christ is not only God-like, He is God in human flesh. (New Life Version)
  • You see, all that is God, all His fullness, resides in His body. (The Voice)
  1. Philippians 2:6 in different English Translations:
  • Who, although being essentially one with God and in the form of God [possessing the fullness of the attributes which make God God], did not think this equality with God was a thing to be eagerly grasped or retained, (Amplified Bible)
  • Christ was truly God. But he did not try to remain equal with God. (Contemporary English Version)
  • He always had the nature of God, but he did not think that by force he should try to remain equal with God. (Good News Translation)
  • For he, who had always been God by nature, did not cling to his prerogatives as God’s equal, (J.B. Phillips New Testament)
  • Who, though he was God, did not demand and cling to his rights as God, (The Living Bible)
  • In his very nature he was God. Jesus was equal with God. But Jesus didn’t take advantage of that fact. (New International Reader’s Version)
  • Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; (New International Version)
  • Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; (New International Version – UK)
  • Jesus has always been as God is. But He did not hold to His rights as God. (New Life Version)
  • Though he was God, he did not think of equality with God as something to cling to. (New Living Translation)
  1. Romans 9:5 in different English Translations:
  • Whose are the fathers, from among whom Christ appeared in the flesh, who is God over all, to whom are due praises and thanksgiving, for ever and ever. Amen. (Lamsa Trnaslation)
  • The Jewish ancestors are theirs, and the Christ descended from those ancestors. He is the one who rules over all things, who is God, and who is blessed forever. Amen. (Common English Bible)
  • They are the descendants of our great fathers, and they are the earthly family of the Messiah, who is God over all things. Praise him forever! Amen. (Easy-to-Read Version)
  • To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen. (English Standard Version)
  • To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ who is God over all, blessed for ever. Amen. (English Standard Version Anglicised)
  • They are the descendants of our great ancestors [They have the fathers/patriarchs], and they are the earthly family into which Christ was born [or from their descendants the Messiah came], who is God over all. Praise him forever [or May God, who is over all, be praised forever]! Amen. (Expanded Bible)
  • Of whom are the fathers, and of whom concerning the flesh, Christ came, who is God over all, blessed forever, Amen. (1599 Geneva Bible)
  • The Messiah is descended from their ancestors according to his human nature. The Messiah is God over everything, forever blessed. Amen. (GOD’S WORD Translation)
  • The ancestors are theirs, and from them, by physical descent, came the Messiah, who is God over all, praised forever. Amen. (Holman Christian Standard Bible)
  • To the Israelis belong the patriarchs, and from them, the Messiah descended, who is God over all, the one who is forever blessed. Amen. (International Standard Version)
  • Just think what the Israelites have had given to them. The privilege of being adopted as sons of God, the experience of seeing something of the glory of God, the receiving of the agreements made with God, the gift of the Law, true ways of worship, God’s own promises—all these are theirs, and so too, as far as human descent goes, is Christ himself, Christ who is God over all, blessed for ever. (Rom 9:4-5, J.B. Phillips New Testament)
  • whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh is the Christ, who is God over all things, blessed for all the ages. Amen. (Jubilee Bible 2000)
  • to whom belong the patriarchs, and from whom is the Christ according to human descent, who is God over all, blessed forever! Amen. (Lexham English Bible)
  • At the same time, you need to know that I carry with me at all times a huge sorrow. It’s an enormous pain deep within me, and I’m never free of it. I’m not exaggerating—Christ and the Holy Spirit are my witnesses. It’s the Israelites . . . If there were any way I could be cursed by the Messiah so they could be blessed by him, I’d do it in a minute. They’re my family. I grew up with them. They had everything going for them—family, glory, covenants, revelation, worship, promises, to say nothing of being the race that produced the Messiah, the Christ, who is God over everything, always. Oh, yes! (Rom 9:1-5, The Message)
  • To them belong the patriarchs, and from them by human descents came the Christ, who is God over all, blessed for all time. Amen. (Mounce Reverse-Interlinear New Testament)
  • The Messiah is descended from their ancestors according to his human nature. The Messiah is God over everything, forever blessed. Amen. (Names of God Bible)
  • They are the descendants of our great ancestors, and they are the earthly family into which Christ was born, who is God over all. Praise him forever! Amen. (New Century Version)
  • To them belong the patriarchs, and from them, by human descent, came the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever! Amen. (New English Translation)
  • The founders of our nation belong to them. The Messiah comes from their family line. He is God over all. May he always be praised! Amen. (New International Reader’s Version)
  • Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of the Messiah, who is God over all, forever praised! Amen. (New International Version)
  • Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of the Messiah, who is God over all, for ever praised! Amen. (New International Version –UK)
  • of whom are the fathers and from whom, according to the flesh, Christ came, who is over all, the eternally blessed God. Amen. (New King James Version)
  • Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are their ancestors, and Christ himself was an Israelite as far as his human nature is concerned. And he is God, the one who rules over everything and is worthy of eternal praise! Amen. (New Living Translation)
  • to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed for ever. Amen. (Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition)
  • whose be the fathers, and of which is Christ after the flesh, that is God above all things, blessed into worlds. Amen. (Wycliffe Bible)
  1. 1Timothy 3:16 in different English Translations:

[Note that God and Jesus Christ are interchangeable because God is Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ is God, as they are one (cf Jn 1:1, 10:30).]

  • And beyond controversy, great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. (21st Century King James Version)
  • And great and important and weighty, we confess, is the hidden truth (the mystic secret) of godliness. He [God] was made visible in human flesh, justified and vindicated in the [Holy] Spirit, was seen by angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, [and] taken up in glory. (Amplified Bible)
  • Here is the great mystery of our religion: Christ came as a human. The Spirit proved that he pleased God, and he was seen by angels. Christ was preached to the nations.  People in this world put their faith in him, and he was taken up to glory.  (Contemporary English Version)
  • And confessedly the mystery of piety is great. God has been manifested in flesh, has been justified in [the] Spirit, has appeared to angels, has been preached among [the] nations, has been believed on in [the] world, has been received up in glory. (Darby Translation)
  • God Was Revealed In The Flesh, But Some Will Depart From The Faith And Good Teaching: And the mystery of godliness is confessedly great: Who was revealed in the flesh, was declared-righteous in the spirit; was seen by messengers, was proclaimed among the nations; was believed in the world, was taken-up in glory. (Disciples’ Literal New Testament)
  • Without a doubt, the secret of our life of worship is great: Christ was shown to us in human form; the Spirit proved that he was right; he was seen by angels. The message about him was told to the nations; people in the world believed in him; he was taken up to heaven in glory. (Easy-to-Read Version)
  • And without controversy, great is the mystery of godliness, which is, God is manifested in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of Angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, and received up in glory. (1599 Geneva Bible)
  • And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. (Jubilee Bible 2000)
  • And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. (King James Version)
  • And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. (Authorized (King James) Version)
  • It is quite true that the way to live a godly life is not an easy matter. But the answer lies in Christ, who came to earth as a man, was proved spotless and pure in his Spirit, was served by angels, was preached among the nations, was accepted by men everywhere, and was received up again to his glory in heaven. The Living Bible)
  • Without question, great is the mystery of godliness: God was revealed in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached to the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up into glory. (Modern English Version)
  • The mystery that gives us our reverence for God is acknowledged to be great: He appeared in his human nature, was approved by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was announced throughout the nations, was believed in the world, and was taken to heaven in glory. (Names of God Bible)
  • There is no doubt that true godliness comes from this great mystery. Jesus came as a human being. The Holy Spirit proved that he was the Son of God.  He was seen by angels.  He was preached among the nations.  People in the world believed in him.  He was taken up to heaven in glory.  (New International Reader’s Version)
  • And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifested in the flesh, Justified in the Spirit, Seen by angels, Preached among the Gentiles, Believed on in the world, Received up in glory. (New King James Version)
  • It is important to know the secret of God-like living, which is: Christ came to earth as a Man. He was pure in His Spirit. He was seen by angels. The nations heard about Him. Men everywhere put their trust in Him. He was taken up into heaven. (New Life Version)
  • Without question, this is the great mystery of our faith: Christ was revealed in a human body and vindicated by the Spirit. He was seen by angels and announced to the nations. He was believed in throughout the world and taken to heaven in glory.  (New Living Translation)
  • Without controversy, the mystery of godliness is great: God was revealed in the flesh, justified in the spirit, seen by angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, and received up in glory. (World English Bible)
  • God’s plan is very great as we all know. Here it is: we saw God as a man; God’s Spirit proved he was right; angels saw him; the nations were told about him; people of the world believed in him; God took him up into heaven. (Worldwide English (New Testament))
  • and, confessedly, great is the secret of piety — God was manifested in flesh, declared righteous in spirit, seen by messengers, preached among nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory! (Young’s Literal Translation)

THE LORD JESUS vs Felix Manalo The False Prophet-Fake Angel

$
0
0
THE LORD JESUS vs Felix Manalo

THE LORD JESUS vs Felix Manalo

 

The Lord Jesus Christ vs Felix Manalo Ysagun… I-splendor na yan hehe

DEBUNKING THE TOYS OF GERRY SOLIMAN AKA RODIMUS THE LIAR-THE HEADLESS CHICKEN Part 4 By Aloysius Kayiwa

$
0
0
Rodimus the deceiver

Rodimus the headless Chicken

THE HEADLESS CHICKEN AND HATE FILLED RODIMUS THE LIAR IS STILL SEEKING CHEAP ATTENTION WHILE ALL THE MORE EXPOSING HIS COWARDLINESS AND RUNNING AROUND LIKE A HEADLESS CHICKEN. AS SOME ONE SAID, HIS BRAIN CELLS ARE FILLED WITH PRIDE AND GARBAGE. THIS IS MY EASY AND FASTER RESPONSE TO HIM. I HAVE PROMISED HIM THAT AS LONG AS HE COMES TO SPLENDOR, WE SHALL ANSWER HIM. HE IS STILL HIDING HIS IDENTITY BUT IT WONT MATTER. WE DON’T GIVE A DAMN TO HIDING COWARDS LIKE HIM.

FIRST TO NOTE, HE ABANDONED MOST OF HIS BOGUS ARGUMENTS AS THEY WERE BEING REFUTED. THEN HE WAS CAUGHT LYING SEVERAL TIMES AND FAILED TO PROVE HIS CLAIMS. AFTER HE FAILED, HE ABANDONED THEM. HAHAHAHA! A STAPLE CHILD’S PLAY FOR AN AMATEUR APOLOGIST AND A LIAR.

“Mr. Kayiwa continues with his bashing and he never learns”

LEARN FROM WHO? YOU? I CAN’T LEARN FROM A HERETIC LIKE YOU. YOU ARE NONSENSE. YOU ARE LIKE A ROTTEN TOMATO. THAT IS WHY AM TELLING YOU THAT YOU ARE SEEKING CHEAP ATTENTION. UNFORTUNATELY, FOR A LIAR AND STUPID FELLOW LIKE YOU CAN NOT TEACH SOME ONE LIKE ME. YOU ARE TOO PATHETIC AND IGNORANT. I DOUBT IF YOU CAN PASS A TEST IN BASIC APOLOGETICS? YOU’VE GOT A MIND OF A TROLL WHICH YOU FILLED WITH GARBAGE.  STOP HALLUCINATING YOU CAN TEACH ME. HELLO, AM NOT YOUR SIZE.

And Catholic Bibles are not full of errors?  Come on.  This is hypocrisy and you know it.  We have been comparing here that the New American Bible (NAB) and it’s revised edition (NABRE) contains the same alleged errors that Mr. Kayiwa is pointing out with the New King James Version (NKJV).”
HAHAHA! YOU DESERVE TO BE LAUGHED AT. LET ME TELL YOU, CATHOLIC BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP IS MILES BETTER THAN PROTESTANT BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP. NOW IF YOU ARE NOT STUPID, YOU ARE MAKING BLANKET STATEMENTS WITHOUT PROOF. FURTHER, YOU ARE TRYING TO COVER THE ERRORS IN YOUR COUNTERFEITS BY COMPARING IT WITH THE CATHOLIC BIBLES. HOWEVER THE ABSURD THING IS THAT WHAT YOUR ALLEGED AS ERRORS ARE NOT ERRORS SINCE THE NABs ARE SINCERE EVEN WITH THE USE OF MODERN TERMS. I WOULD NOT BELIEVE A HERETIC POINTING OUT ERRORS IN NABs BECAUSE I KNOW THAT YOU ARE HERETIC THROUGH AND THROUGH. ALL THIS IS MERE WHINING. YOU WILL FAIL MISERABLY. AND NO ONE WILL ALSO LISTEN TO YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE NON-SENSE TO PEOPLE. ANY WAY, DOES THE NAB HAVE PUBLIC OUTCRY LIKE THE KJVs HAVE? DOES IT? YOU WILL NOT FIND THAT…..KEEP  WHINING.
“A question that Mr. Kayiwa which he must answer head on: Are Catholic English Bible versions free of errors?”
WHO ARE YOU THAT I MUST ANSWER YOU? EXCUSE ME, YOU ARE NONSENSE TO ME. ANY WAY CATHOLIC BIBLE TRANSLATORS ADHERE TO ALL THE NECESSARY ISSUES INVOLVED IN TRANSLATION-WITHOUT TAMPERING WITH DOCTRINE. TELL ME ONE CATHOLIC BIBLE THAT HAS DOCTRINE CHANGED  BECAUSE OF YOUR ALLEGED “ERRORS”? NONE. NOW LOOK AT THE KJV, NIV, NEW WORLD TRANSLATION OF THE JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES, LOOK AT THE LAMSA TRANSLATION OF THE MANALO’S, THE NWT INSERTED THE WORD JEHOVAH WHERE IT WAS NEVER, IT LESSENS JESUS AS MERE MAN INSTEAD OF BOTH TRUE GOD AND TRUE MAN.THE NIV DENIES THE DIETY OF CHRIST BY REMOVING BEGOTTEN FROM EVERY TEXT RELATED TO JESUS. YOU WILL FIND OUT THAT DOCTRINES HAVE BEEN CHANGED IN PROTESTANT BIBLES BECAUSE OF THEIR POOR SCHOLARSHIP AND HERETICAL TAMPERING WITH THE BIBLE. THE NKJV DELETED WHOLE BIBLE BOOKS LIKE BARUCH, JUDITH,WISDOM AND OTHERS YET THESE WERE IN THE OLD KJV! COMPARE THE CATHOLIC BIBLES( DOUAY-RHEIMS, NAB AND THE JERUSALEM BIBLE)WOULD YOU FIND SUCH A  SCENARIO IN THESE CATHOLIC BIBLES? THEN COMPARE PROTESTANT BIBLES LIKE  KJV, NKJV, CONTEMPORARY KJV, RSV, NRSV, ENGLISH BIBLE, NEB, NIV, ASB, NASB,NEW WORLD TRANSLATION, LAMSA TRANSLATION, NEW ENGLISH BIBLE ETC…… THEY ARE MANY. THE LIST IS ENDLESS. YOU WILL FIND THAT DOCTRINE IS CHANGED.AND TO REMIND YOU,AMONG ALL THESE BIBLE ANY REASONABLY ACCURATE TRANSLATION IS FUNDAMENTALLY AND SUBSTANTIALLY CATHOLIC DO A CURSORY STUDY, YOU WILL FIND OUT.NOW I HAVE ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION, KEEP BLEATING YOUR TAUTOLOGY.
“Let’s educate Mr. Kayiwa here about apples and oranges:”
YOU ARE JUST LICKING YOUR LIPS LIKE AN HUNGRY DOG. A HERETIC LIKE YOU CAN NOT EDUCATE ANY ONE. YOU ARE LOW QUALITY. THAT IS WHY I TOLD YOU THAT YOUR IQ IS SIMILAR TO THAT OF A COCKROACH. YOU ARE HOLLOW MINDED. STOP YOUR PRETENSE DEAR RODIMUS THE COWARD.
“Latin Vulgate -> Latin NAB -> English NKJV ->  English”
SO THAT PROVES ……….WHAT? WHAT ARE YOU EDUCATING HERE? I KNOW ALL THIS. SO IT IS MEANINGLESS HERE. HELLO?
“Is Mr. Kayiwa criticizing Protestant Latin Bible Versions? Definitely not, because he is criticizing Protetstant English Bible Versions. Do you compare Latin with English?”
IS..IS..IS..WE…WE…WE….ALL THAT IS MERE WHINING. LOL! HAHAHA SO IS THIS WHAT YOU ARE EDUCATING? YOU ARE BECOMING MORE STUPID. THE ISSUE IS THAT THE OFFICIAL BIBLE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE LATIN VULGATE. YOU KNOW THAT. WHY? BECAUSE IT IS IN LATIN AND LATIN IS THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. ALL OTHER BIBLE TRANSLATIONS ARE NOT THE OFFICIAL BIBLES. THEY ARE JUST TRANSLATIONS FOR ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLE AND OTHERS. SO YOUR CLAIMED EDUCATING IS NOTHING BUT POINTLESS AND A SIGN OF YOUR LOW QUALITY MIND FILLED WITH DUNG.
“So what do we do when your opponent has apples?  We also should use apples.  Since the NAB’s source is the Latin Vulgate, it should be a competent English comparison with the NKJV.  To say that I should go to the Latin Vulgate and criticize it while he get to criticize English versions, is absolutely silly.  Exercise some common sense, Mr. Kayiwa.”
YOU AND WHO RODIMUS THE LIAR? ALL THIS IS MEANINGLESS. IT DOES EVEN APPLY ANY WHERE. THE LATIN VULGATE IS A VERSION ITSELF AND THE NAB IS ALSO. AGAIN YOU LIED THROUGH YOUR TEETH THAT THE NAB WAS TRANSLATED FROM THE LATIN VULGATE. LIAR! IF YOU ARE NOT AN IDIOT, THE NAB WAS TRANSLATED FROM ORIGINAL LANGUAGES. YOU ARE THE VERY SILLY ONE MORE SINCE YOU ARE LYING THAT THE SOURCE OF THE NAB IS THE LATIN VULGATE.STUPID! THE NAB WAS TRANSLATED FROM ORIGINAL AND GREEK MANUSCRIPTS, SEPTUAGINT, AND DEAD SEA SCROLLS FOR THE OT AND NT. ALL ALONG YOU HAVE BEEN LYING THROUGH YOUR TEETH. YOU ARE THE SILLY ONE AND NEED TO HAVE SOME COMMON SENSE BECAUSE YOU ARE CAUGHT LYING THROUGH YOUR TEETH. SHAME ON YOU!
“Yeah when NKJV and NAB used “Hades” in Revelations, NKJV is wrong to use it while NAB is right.  How absurd!”
DO YOU HAVE A BRAIN OR YOU FILLED IT WITH DUNG? OKAY, NOW WHAT ABOUT YOUR KJV? DOES IT HAVE HADES THERE? HAHAHA LOL! I SEE YOU ARE UNEASY WITH THE OLD KJV YET IT IS WHAT YOU WORSHIP IN YOUR PROTESTANT SECTS AND CULTS. ALL ALONG I HAVE BEEN TELLING YOU ONE OF THE KJVs HAS IT WRONG THERE, THE KJV HAS HELL THEIR WHICH IS INCORRECT. NOW LEARN YOUR LESSON WELL.
“Who ever said that I use the accusation of your plagiarism to defend the KJV?  Plagiarism is a serious blow to your integrity, Mr. Kayiwa.  Do you even know what integrity means?  I guess not since you have none.”
HAHAHA LOL! NOW YOU ARE ABANDONING THAT? YOU WERE LOUD AND UNRELENTING WITH CLAIMS OF PLAGIARISM. I TOLD YOU THAT THEY WONT WORK TO ABSOLVE YOUR FAKE KJVs FOR BEING COUNTERFEITS. I KNOW WHAT INTEGRITY MEANS. EXCUSE ME CHAP, YOU CAN NOT TEACH ME. IT IS YOU WITHOUT INTEGRITY SINCE YOU ARE FOND OF LYING, SCHEMING AND HIDING LIKE A COWARD. YOU ARE TOO STUPID AND THAT IS WHY YOU FIND IT EASY TO LIE AND HIDE YOUR IDENTITY LIKE A RAT COWERING AFTER STEALING FOOD.
“I don’t deny saying that.  But like I said, your dirty tactics take things out of context.  Here is the truth of the matter:”
GOOD YOU ADMIT! REGARDING CLAIMS OF TAKING YOU OUT OF CONTEXT, THEY ARE JUST SILLY. YOU SAID THAT THE GREEK WORD FOR HELL IS HADES…IS NT IT? IS THE GREEK WORD FOR HELL “HADES” REALLY? IS HADES THE WAY HELL IS WRITTEN IN GREEK”? EVEN AT MATTHEW 16:18, IS THAT THE WAY THEY WRITE HELL IN GREEK? I MEAN IN GREEK TEXT?? DO YOU UNDERSTAND BETTER? IN REALITY SUCH BOGUS CLAIMS WILL NOT WORK EITHER. YOU ARE JUST BEHAVING LIKE A SCARED BOXER WITH VARIOUS SUNDRY EXCUSES BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN SLAUGHTERED AND NOW YOU ARE RUNNING AROUND HEADLESS LIKE A FRESHLY SLAUGHTERED CHICKEN. HAHAHA. MAY BE WE POWER SALT IN YOUR WOUNDS. OH YOU WOULD RUN AROUND HEADLESS WITH PAIN FLAPPING YOUR HELPLESS WINGS SCREAMING IN PAIN. HAHAHA
“You’re so focused with the last sentence.  Then again, your apologetics suffer from myopia.”
IDIOT! YOU DON’T KNOW THE GREEK WORD FOR HADES. IT IS NOT HADES. YOU HAD TO PROVIDE THE GREEK TEXT INSTEAD OF CLAIMING THAT THE GREEK WORD FOR HELL IS HADES. I THINK YOU ARE SUFFERING FROM MENTAL ILLNESS. PLEASE SEEK THE SERVICES OF A PSYCHIATRIST BECAUSE YOU SEEM TO HAVE A MENTAL IMPAIRMENT. YOU WOULD BE PROVIDED WITH FREE DRUGS.
“No but you are for sure, beyond help.  You were citing verses but you suddenly use a dictionary showing a Greek word without stating what verse is the word connected to.  Sure you have a Greek dictionary, but on what verse?  Do you now see how incompetent your arguments are?”
IT IS YOU WHO IS FAR BEYOND HELP. YOU ARE MENTALLY IMPAIRED. YOU NEED TO SEE A PSYCHIATRIST ASAP BEFORE YOUR MENTAL IMPAIRMENT TURNS INTO EPILEPSY. YOU CLAIMED THAT THE GREEK WORD FOR HELL IS HADES WHICH IS COMPLETELY INCORRECT. WHAT IS INDICATED AT MATTHEW 16: 8 IN YOUR COUNTERFEIT NKJV IS THE GREEK WORD FOR HADES AND NOT THE GREEK WORD FOR HELL AS HADES. I THINK THIS BLUNDER IS DUE TO THE FACT THAT YOUR ENGLISH GRAMMAR IS VERY BAD. WHAT IS INDICATED AT MATTWEW VERSE IN YOUR COUNTERFEITS IS THE GREEK WORD FOR HADES AND NOT THE GREEK WORD FOR HELL AS HADES. IT MEANS THEREFORE THAT YOU ARE VERY INCOMPETENT IN APOLOGETIC SINCE YOU CAN NOT EXPLAIN THINGS CLEARLY. YOU ARE LOW QUALITY. AGAIN I CITED YOU THE GREEK WORD FOR HADES IN MY 3RD RESPONSE AS IT IS AT MATT 18:8. DIDN’T I? A LIAR LIKE YOU IS VERY INCOMPETENT, UNRELIABLE AND BOGUS. THAT IS WHY I TOLD YOU THAT YOUR IQ IS SIMILAR TO THAT OF A COCKROACH. YOU DO NOT THINK WELL. YOU’VE GOT THE BRAIN AND FILLED IT WITH DUNG.
“Finally!  Thanks for supporting me.  We’re only after the word Hades because your first article is about translation issue but you were childish enough to stray away.  I’m done with that now thanks to your realization.”
DON’T BE SILLY RODIMUS THE LIAR. WHEN DID I STRAY AWAY? THE USE OF HADES THERE DOES NOT WATER DOWN THAT GEHENNA IS OUT OF THE PICTURE. AS I TOLD YOU, JESUS SPOKE SYMBOLICALLY. YOUR STUPIDITY IS SEEN WHEN YOU READ MATT 16:8 TOO LITERAL. AGAIN YOU DON’T ANSWER WHERE DO HERETICS GO? WHO ARE THE HERETICS> LIARS LIKE YOU. WHERE DO LIARS GO? GEENA OR HADES? SURELY GEENA. THE SYMBOLIC USE OF HADES THERE HAS A HIGHER AND GLORIOUS USE OF GEENA BY EXTENSION THERE. AND BTW, DO THE NABs USE HADES OR NETHERWORLD? NETHERWORLD…RIGHT? WHY? BECAUSE THEY WANT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OLD TESTAMENT INORDER TO DISTINGUSH THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN HADES/SHEOL AND GEENA-WHICH YOU ARE IGNORANT ABOUT. YOU KEEP REPEATING YOUR TOYS WHEN YOU HAVE NO POINT AT ALL.YOU SHOULD BE DONE INDEED BECAUSE YOU ARE HAVE NO POINT AT ALL HERE BUT JUST BEING SHORT SIGHTED.
“Hypocrisy again.  Your blog criticizes Protestants for their disunity.  But when you are in contradiction with other Catholic apologists, it’s okay. Is Mr. Kayiwa saying that he is better than Mr. Armstrong?”
NOSENSE! WHY DID THIS BLOG COME UP? IT WAS INSPIRED BY ANTI-CATHOLICS AND SATAN’S SERVANTS LIKE YOU WHO WERE ATTACKING THE CATHOLIC CHURCH WITH IMPUNITY AND OBSCENESS. THIS IS THE REASON WHY THIS BLOG EXISTS. TO REFUTE THE ATTACKS FROM HERETICS LIKE YOU. THIS IS THE REASON WHY IT WAS SET UP. AGAIN AS I TOLD YOU, IF YOU FIND IT EASY TO ATTACK OTHERS, BE ALSO READY TO EXPECT RESPONSE. WE CAN NOT KEEP QUIET WHEN YOU ARE ATTACKING US. WE ARE NOT STUPID. WE SHALL ANSWER YOU WITH EVEN GREATER FORCE. IF YOU FIND THAT BAD, THEM STOP YOUR ANTI-CATHOLIC RHETORIC AND HARLOTRY. YOU WILL NOT SEE US ANSWERING AND EXPOSING HERETICS LIKE YOU. AGAIN, ONE OF THE PURPOSES OF APOLOGETICS IS TO DESTROY HERESIES. THE BIBLE COMMANDS US TO DO. A USELESS CHAP WILL NOT STOP US FROM THIS NOBLE MISSION. THE WHOLE HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY IS FILLED DEFENDERS OF THE APOSTOLIC FAITH.
AND BTW, I HEAR YOU SAY “PROTESTANT DISUNITY”. LET ME LAUGH AT YOU HAHAHAHAHA. ARE WE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR DISUNITY? IF SATAN LED YOU TREK HIS PATHS, THEN YOU CAN HAVE ONLY YOURSELVES TO BLAME. GOD DOES NOT USE PROTESTERS. AND INDEED DISUNITY IS BROUGHT BY PROTESTERS.THE BIBLE SAYS THAT DISUNITY IS A RESULT OF SATAN. YOU PROTESTANTS  HAVE SATAN AS YOUR FATHER. LOOK, THERE ARE ABOUT 440.000 PROTESTANT SECTS AND CULTS WHICH CAN NOT AGREE ON A SINGLE BASIC DOCTRINE. SOME TEACH THAT JESUS IS NOT GOD, THAT JESUS IS HALF MAN AND HALF GOD, THAT MARY IS NOT THE MOTHER OF JESUS, THAT THE EUCHARIST IS ONLY SYMBOLICAL AND SUCH OTHER HERESIES. AND YOU THINK WE CAN TOLERATE SUCH STUPIDITY? PLEASE SPARE US YOUR STUPIDITY.
AS REGARDS CATHOLIC APOLOGISTS, IF AM NOT BETTER THAN ARMSTRONG, THEN WHY ARE ARGUING WITH ME? IF ARMSTRONG IS BETTER THAN ME, THEN FOLLOW HIM. I KNOW HE IS NOT INFALLIBLE, HE IS HUMAN JUST LIKE ME. AND HUMANS ARE NOT INFALLIBLE. ANY WAY HE IS A CONVERT FROM PROTESTANTISM. IF YOU THINK HE IS BETTER THAN ME, THEN FOLLOW HIM. BE A CATHOLIC AS WELL BECAUSE HE WAS A PROTESTANT BEFORE AND BECAME CATHOLIC AFTER DISCOVERING THE TRUTH. AND AM GLAD HE IS. ANY WAY DO YOU KNOW WHAT? AM ALSO A FORMER PENTECOSTAL. I CONVERTED TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AFTER DISCOVERING THE FALSEHOOD IN YOUR PROTESTANT SECTS AND CULTS. WHAT ARE YOU WAITING? HOW LONG WILL YOU REMAIN A MINION OF SATAN? DAVE ARM STRONG IS NOT INFALLIBLE, HE IS AN APOLOGIST IN HIS OWN RIGHT. AM ANOTHER IN MY OWN RIGHT. I DO NOT NEED TO AGREE WITH ARMSTRONG ON EVERYTHING. SO EAT YOUR HEART OUT.
“By the way, who are you to tell me that it is not right that I cite Catholic apologist.  You cite Protestant sources, so why I can’t do the same?”
IT ONLY SHOWS THAT YOU ARE THE BEST FOOL ON EARTH. AND IT ALSO SHOWS THAT YOU ARE A DOUBLE MINDED FOOL. TODAY YOU WILL CITE A CATHOLIC SOURCE. THEN WHEN YOU RETURN TO YOUR HARLOTRY AND ANTI-CATHOLIC MINISTRY OF SHAME, YOU START TO ATTACK THE CATHOLIC CITE YOU VISITED. MOST PROBABLY YOU DISAGREE WITH WHAT THAT SITE SAYS YET YOU USED IT EARLIER ON. YOU ARE VERY STUPID AND SICK IN THE BRAIN. AND PLEASE TELL ME WHEN I CITED A PROTESTANT SOURCE? DO NOT BE SILLY. STOP IMPOSING ON US YOUR SATANIC TACTICS.
“Oh so when a Catholic uses hades, it’s fine.  But when a Protestant uses hades, it’s not okay.  Let’s lecture Mr. Kayiwa on the term double standard;”
ALL THAT IS A WASTE OF TIME. YOU ARE JUST SEEKING CHEAP ATTENTION. YOU CAN  NOT LECTURE ME.DO NOT BE OFFENDEED BY THAT BUT IT IS TRUE. IF ARM STRONG USES HADES, IT IS FINE FOR HIM. HE IS NOT ME. GO AND LECTURE HIM AND STOP SHOWING US  HOW STUPID YOU ARE. NO ONE IS INTERESTED IN YOUR LECTURES.
“Then again, Mr. Kayiwa seems to lack the capacity to understand that.
YOUR LACK OF UNDERSTANDING IS EVIDENT IN THIS BLOG. THAT IS WHY MANY PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT YOU. JUST DO A SEARCH OF ARTICLES IN WHICH YOU HAVE BEEN THOROUGHLY REFUTED AND DEMOLISHED. YOU WILL DISCOVER WHERE YOU BELONG. I ALREADY SHOWED YOU THAT YOUR IQ IS SIMILAR TO THAT OF A COCKROACH. YOU GOT A BRAIN AND FILLED IT WITH DUNG AND GARBAGE. YOU ARE LOW QUALITY. THAT IS WHY EVERYBODY KNOWS YOU AS RODIMUS THE LIAR, THE IDIOT AND THE HIDING COWARD. I ADDED ANOTHER ALIAS FOR YOU; RODIMUS THE DOUBLE MINDED OCCULTIST, RODIMUS THE HEADLESS CHICKEN. HEHEHEHE. YOU DESERVE ALL THAT BECAUSE YOU ARE A FOOL. IT SUITS YOU TO BE A FOOL.NOW YOU ARE JUST A HEADLESS CHICKEN SEEKING CHEAP ATTENTION.
“And you claim you’re not changing topic.  We’re not discussing your false doctrine of papacy, Mr. Kayiwa, so please try to focus.”
IDIOT! YOU QUOTED HANN ON AN ISSUE IN A TOPIC WHERE HE WAS TEACHING ABOUT THE PAPACY. FIRST OF ALL WHY DID YOU QUOTE HIM ON AN ISSUE WHERE HE WAS TEACHING A FALSE DOCTRINE AS YOU CLAIM? AND THEN YOU EXPECTED ME TO AGREE ON A POINT IN WHICH SOME ONE IS TEACHING A FALSE DOCTRINE? DO YOU SEE HOW SILLY YOU ARE? THIS IS NOT CHANGING TOPIC BUT SHOWING THAT YOU ARE A FOOL.
AGAIN, YOU CLAIM THAT THE PAPACY IS A FALSE DOCTRINE BUT THE BIBLE AND EARLY CHRISTIANS TESTIFY THAT THE PAPACY IS BIBLICAL AND APOSTOLIC. IT IS A FACT NO MATTER WHAT YOU DECEPTIVELY AND DEVIOUSLY CLAIM. THAT ONLY PROVES THAT YOU ARE A GOOD ANTI-CATHOLIC WHO WILL FIND IT OKAY TO ATTACK CATHOLIC BELIEFS AND DO NOT EXPECT US TO RESPOND. NOW, PROVE IN ANOTHER TOPIC THAT THE PAPACY IS A FALSE DOCTRINE. PROVE THAT? BLANKET STATEMENTS AND SWEEPING GENERALIZATIONS ARE NOT EVIDENCE BUT ONLY SHOW HOW STUPID YOU ARE. THEY ONLY SHOW YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF PROVIDING PROOF. CAN YOU SEE HOW SAD THAT REALLY IS? ANY WAY HERE IS A RESPONSE IN WHICH PROF. RAMON GITAMONDOC THOROUGHLY REFUTED YOU ON THE PAPACY; PAPACY
“What is silly is that your camp is filled with contradictions.  It’s a given!”
LOL! HAHAHA YOU ARE THE SILLY ONES. I SENSE YOU ARE EGG FACED NOW. IS IT BECAUSE I BROUGHT IT TO YOUR ATTENTION YOUR DOUBLE MINDEDNESS IN CITING CATHOLIC APOLOGISTS AND WHEN YOU RETURN TO YOUR ANTI-CATHOLIC MINISTRY OF SHAME AND HARLOTRY, YOU DISAGREE WITH THEM? PLEASE STONEWALL YOURSELF. AND BY THE WAY, WE KNOW THAT THE WHOLE PROTESTANT MOVEMENT IS FILLED WITH CONTRADICTIONS. PROTESTANT SECTS AND CULTS DISAGREE AMONG THEMSELVES THAT JESUS IS NOT GOD, THAT THE EUCHARIST IS SYMBOLIC, YOU CONTRADICT YOURSELVES THAT MARY IS NOT THE MOTHER OF JESUS, THAT THERE IS NO ORIGINAL SIN ETC. THE WHOLE PROTESTANT DISUNITY IS BECAUSE OF THESE CONTRADICTIONS WHICH ARE HERETICAL. THE RESULT OF ALL THIS IS 440,000 SECTS AND CULTS WHICH DO NOT AGREE AMONG THEMSELVES. AS YOU ROT IN THIS BUSINESS, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH REMAINS STRONGLY UNIFIED. YOUR PROTESTANT SECTS AND CULTS ARE A FAILURE. WHAT YOU ARE JUST HIGHLIGHTING IS A DIFFERENCES IN THOUGHT BUT NOT CONTRADICTIONS. PLEASE EDUCATE YOUR IDIOTIC MIND.
“Well, let’s see if the NAB does not omit verses and move it in the footnotes.Let’s read Matthew 18:11:
“Some manuscripts add, “For the Son of Man has come to save what was lost”; cf. Mt 9:13. This is practically identical with Lk 19:10 and is probably a copyist’s addition from that source.”
AND THE FOOTNOTE IN THE NAB ANSWERS YOUR CURIOSITY. THAT VERSE WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE THERE. IT IS NOT FOUND IN THE OLDEST AND RELIABLE MANUSCRIPTS. IT WAS AN ADDITION BY SCRIBES.THAT IS WHAT THEY MEAN BY COPYIST ADDITIONS. THE NAB EXCELS IN EXPLAINING WHY THIS VERSE IS NOT INCLUDED.IN MY ARTICLE I SAID THAT THE NIV DELETES VERSES WITHOUT DULY GIVING EXPLANATIONS WHY. NOW AFTER KNOWING THAT THE NAB GIVES A GOOD EXPLANATION, COMPARE WITH THE NIV, YOU WILL FIND THAT THE NIV DOES NOT INDICATE THE OMITTED VERSE IN THE FOOTNOTES AND GIVES NO COMMENT AT ALL. THAT IS DECEPTION. WHAT IS EVIDENT IS THAT THE VERSE IN QUESTION IS CITED IN THE NAB’S FOOTNOTES WITH A CLEAR EXPLANATION WHILE THE NIV FAILS COMPLETELY.
“Now let’s ask Mr. Kayiwa why the NAB would “delete verses and deceptively insert them in footnotes”?  Let’s give him multiple answers for him to choose:”
ALL YOUR QUESTIONS ARE A SIGN OF DELUSION. THE NAB CITES THE VERSE AND EXPLAINS THE REASON FOR DOING SO WHILE THE NIV FAILS TO DO. WHICH IS DECEPTIVE AMONG THE TWO? THE NAB IS JUSTIFIED HERE BECAUSE IT GIVES PROPER REASONS FOR DOING SO WHILE THE NIV IS NOT JUSTIFIED BECAUSE IT DOES NOT GIVE PROPER REASONS FOR DOING SO. IT IS DECEPTIVE BECAUSE IT HIDES THE REASON FOR DOING SO. SEARCH FOR IT HERE, YOU WILL SEE THE DIFFERENCE. THE NIV NEVER EXPLAINED IT. I T JUST MAKES A REFERENCE TO LUKE WITHOUT SAYING THAT IT IS A COPYIST ADDITION. LOL!
“So why would a Catholic store sell a jewelry which you think is Satanic?  Common sense, please.”
HAHAHAHAHAHA! NOW YOU ABANDONED YOUR NONSENSE THAT THE IMAGES YOU PRESENTED ARE SIMILAR. HAHAHA. LOL! YOU APPEARED VERY STUPID WHEN YOU COULD NOT REALIZE THAT THOSE IMAGES WERE DIFFERENT. SO WHY WOULD PEOPLE  PUT A SATANIC SYMBOL WITH PAGAN ORIGINS (AS YOU CLAIMED) ON THE BIBLE-THE WORD OF GOD? WHICH IS WORSE? USE YOUR COMMON SENSE ALSO. THE IMAGES YOU PRESENTED WERE NOT SIMILAR. WHEN REFUTED ON THAT, YOU NOW DRIFT TO OTHER THINGS AND EXECUSES. THE KJVs PUT A QUESTIONABLE SYMBOL ON THE WORD OF GOD. NO MORE NO LESS! CLAIMS OF JEWELRY WILL NOT WORK TO COVER FOR THE FACT THAT YOU LIED THROUGH YOUR TEETH THAT THE IMAGE BELONGS TO A PARISH, THAT THE IMAGE ARE NOT IDENTICAL, AND THAT YOU FAILED TO PROVIDE A LINK TO A PARISH THAT YOU CLAIMED USE THE IMAGE YOU PROVIDED. YOU LIED RODIMUS THE LIAR. YOU ARE STUPID IN PROPER EVIDENCES.
“On that note, and for our article’s finale let’s expose another hypocrisy of Mr. Kayiwa.  In his first article he said:”
GO RODIMUS THE LIAR…….PEOPLE ARE CONTINUALLY SEEING HOW STUPID YOU ARE…
IT IS VERY EVIDENT THAT PROTESTANT SCHOLARS ARE THE WORST. YOU GIVE A VERY GOOD EXAMPLE OF HOW PROTESTANT SCHOLARS ARE INCOPETENT BECAUSE WE HAVE REFUTED YOU HERE SEVERAL TIMES. IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE. THEY HAVE LED TO VARIOUS HERESIES BEGINNING WITH LUTHER, FOLLOWED BY HIS HERETICAL FOLLOWERS INCLUDING VARIOUS OFF SHOOT PROTESTANT SECTS LIKE BAPTIST SECTS AND CULTS, BEREANS, JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES, MORMONS, ELI SORIANO, FELIX MANALO, ELLEN WHITE ETC.SOME OF THESE HERETICS ARE HOMOSEXUAL RAPISTS, FRAUDS, THEIVES AND FREE MASONS. THE VIEWS OF PROTESTANT SCHOLARS MERELY BREASTFEED FROM THESE HERETICS INCLUDING YOURSELF. YOU ARE MOVED BY WILLFUL HERESY AND THE INTENTION TO MISLEAD.THAT IS WHY THERE IS NO TRUTH IN PROTESTANT SECTS AND CULTS, AND WHERE IT IS-IT IS ONLY HALF TRUTH. BUT, HALF TRUTH IS NEVER TRUTH. IT HAS TO BE FULL TRUTH OR NOT. LOOK HOW ELI SORIANO PRESENTS INCORRECT TEACHINGS WITH IMPUNITY. SHAME ON YOU AGENTS OF THE DEVIL.
“Now, here is a citation from an article in the Splendor of the Church blog:”
OH AND I REMEMBER WELL. I QUOTED THAT WHILE RESPONDING A FOLLOWER OF MAMA ELI SORIANO. IT IS NOT GOING TO WORK EITHER. FIRST, USE YOUR BRAIN TO UNDERSTAND THAT I WAS RESPONDING TO A PERSON WHO USES THE KJV ONLY. THE MCGI USES THE KJVs AS THEIR PREFFERED BIBLE. THAT IS WHY WE USE IT WHILE QUOTING THEM VERSES SO THAT OUR REFUTATION OF THEM WILL BE EFFECTIVE. WE USE THEIR WEAPON AGAINST THEM. UNFORTUNATELY YOU ARE TOO HOLLOW MINDED TO REALIZE THAT. GO QUOTE ANOTHER VERSION OF THE BIBLE FOR A SORIANO FOLLOWER AND YOU WILL SEE IF THEY WILL BUY YOUR CLAIMS. REASON BEING THEY HAVE BEEN PROGRAMMED TO BELIEVE THAT OTHER VERSIONS ARE FALSE. YOU DON’T REALIZE WHY WE QUOTE FROM THE KJV, INSTEAD YOU SHOW HOW HOLLOW MINDED YOU ARE. YOUR PRESENTATION HERE IS MISGUIDED AND MISPLACED.
“Is this true?  Mr. Aloysius Kayiwa himself cited from NKJV which he says is Satanic and full of errors?  It sure is!”
I HOPE YOU HAVE UNDERSTOOD WHY I QUOTED THE VERSE FROM THE NKJV FOR A SORIANO FOLLOWER. NOW YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT SORIANO’S FOLLOWERS WON’T ACCEPT BIBLE VERSES FROM OTHER VERSIONS. BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN INOCULATED TO BELIEVE THAT OTHER VERSIONS ARE FALSE. THAT IS WHY I QUOTED FROM THE NKJV. YOU ARE CLUELESS INDEED BECAUSE YOU DON’T KNOW THAT SORIANO’S FOLLOWERS WONT ACCEPT VERSES FROM OTHER VERSIONS. FOR US WE QUOTE VERSES FROM THE VERSION THEY PREFER SO THEY ACCEPT OUR PRESENTATIONS MUCH MORE.THAT WAY WE ARE ABLE TO REFUTE THEM. YOU DON’T KNOW THAT.
‘I am reminded of the Iglesia ni Cristo 1914 cult whose ministers said that Catholicism and Protestantism are to be rejected because both are of the devil but ironically use Bible versions printed by the two religions which they are to reject.”
YOUR REMINDER IS POINTLESS AND COMICAL. ITS DOES NOT APPLY HERE. BESIDES WE KNOW ALL THAT. SO THERE IS NOTHING NEW YOU ARE TRYING TO EXPOUND HERE. THESE ARE OLD WIVES TALES.
“Oh why did you contradict yourself for several times now, Mr. Kayiwa.  Here are multiple choice answers:”
HHHMMM! RUBRID!. CLAIMS OF CONTRADICTIONS HAVE BEEN DISPELLED. YOUR ATTEMPTS TO INSINUATE THAT I USED A SATANIC BIBLE IN A VERSE FAILED BECAUSE I QUOTED IT TO A PERSON WHO PREFERS THE NKJV BIBLE. UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS USELESS TO QUOTE A VERSE FROM A BIBLE VERSION WHICH THE OPPONENT HATES/DOES NOT USE. YOU INSTEAD USE A BIBLE THAT YOUR OPPONENT ACCEPTS MUCH MORE AND THEN GO AHEAD AND REFUTE HIM/HER. ARE YOU SO DULL TO REALIZE THAT? THE QUESTIONS YOU PRESENTED ARE POINTLESS AND JUST SIGNS OF DELUSION. GO ASK THEM YOUR DELUSIONAL FELLOWS. A NOT YOUR SIZE RODIMUS THE LIAR.
“Oh well, I’m sure he’ll give his childish response once more.  Hopefully he’ll have direct and intelligent answers to these questions:”
NONSENSE! ALL ALONG YOU’VE BEEN GIVING CHILDISH RESPONSES HERE. DON’T IMPOSE YOUR CHILDISH MENTALITY ON US. YOU BEHAVE LIKE A TODDLER. YOU ARE A KNOWN LIAR, A HIDING COWARD AND AN IDIOT. WE KNOW YOU WELL. HERE IS WHAT PEOPLE SAID ABOUT YOUR CHILD PLAY. 3 OF THESE ARE WOMEN;
  • “Gerry Soliman… you’re so immature, parang kinder. Kung anu-ano lang ang sinasabi kunwari magaling… hehehe… nakakahiya!”
  • “Huh.. Even a not expert apologist can defeat this liar in a debate. Paulit ulit xa.. Prang d nakakaintindi.”
  • “Sira at husga pa more, mga non-Catholic heretics, and you will be refuted even more!”
  • HE CLAIMS TO BE AN AUDITOR OF AN AUDITING FIRM..BUT STUDIED IN A CATHOLIC SCHOOL… . LIKE ALL OF THEM BEREANS.. THEY WANT TO MAKE A NAME.. NOW WHERE IS THE GROUP .. MORIBUND NA YATA EH ..
  • His statements are not argumentative. I think even a non apologist catholic can argue with him. He obviously know nothing.. Tsk tsk
LET COMMENTATORS HAVE FUN AT YOU AND REFUTE YOUR BOGUS CLIAMS. TSK TSK TSK. YOU ARE IMMATURE, A LIAR,A  HIDING COWARD AND AN IDIOT. YOU ARE NON SENSE. A CHEAP HERETIC SEEKING CHEAP ATTENTION. IN REALITY DO NOT EXPECT ANY CATHOLIC TO TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY BECAUSE YOU ARE A KNOWN LIAR AND A COWARD. YOU CAN ONLY TO BE SNEERED AT. WHERE DID YOU GROW FROM? FROM A TOILET OR IN A PRISON? HEHEHE! YOU WERE NOT SOCIALIZED PROPERLY.IT IS EVIDENT. YOU NEED TO BE RE-SOCIALIZED SO YOU WILL LEARN TO BE MUCH MORE SOCIALIZED.
BUT THANKS FOR VISITING SPLENDOR BLOG. YOU CHAPS ARE THE REASON THIS BLOG IS FAMOUS AND NUMBER ONE.I HEARD THAT YOUR LOW QUALITY BLOG COLLAPSED WHEN YOU WERE THOROUGHLY CLOBBERED SOME TIME BACK.AND GUY, THAT APOLOGY YOU GAVE IS RECORDED IN THIS BLOG(PLEASE READERS HERE IS THE LINK TO HIS APOLOGY http://www.splendorofthechurch.com.ph/2013/06/02/rodimus-apologized-after-proven-wrong-beyond-any-reasonable-doubt/). THIS WHOLE BLOG EXISTS FOR PEOPLE LIKE RODIMUS THE LIAR WHO ATTACK THE CATHOLIC FAITH-HERETICS, LIARS,ANTI-CATHOLICS AND OTHERS WHO FOLLOW THE VOICE OF SATAN. WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR HARLOTRY AND STUPIDITY RODIMUS THE LIAR. YOU HAVE ONLY YOURSELVES TO BLAME. UNLESS YOU SEE LIGHT. BEREANS WILL NOT HELP YOU. THEY ARE HERETICS. REMINDER: AS LONG AS YOU COME TO THIS BLOG, WE SHALL RESPOND YOU WITH BOMBS. I HAVE INTERNET FULL TIME. AND IT IS EASY AND FASTER FOR ME TO RESPOND AND SHAME YOU. MERRY CHRISTMAS IF YOU CELEBRATE IT. AND HAPPY NEW YEAR TOO.

THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION OF MARY by Hendrick Albina

$
0
0

The Immaculate Virgin

The Immaculate Virgin

Immaculate Conception:

1. Mary is revealed to be “full of grace” in Luke 1:28.

2. Mary is revealed to be the fulfillment of the prophetic “Daughter of Zion” of Zech. 2:10; Zeph. 3:14-16; Isaiah 12:1-6, etc.

3. Mary is revealed to be “the beginning of the new creation” in fufillment of the prophecy of Jer. 31:22.

4. Mary is revealed to possess a “blessed state” parallel with Christ’s in Luke 1:42.

5. Mary is not just called “blessed” among women, but “more blessed than all women” (including Eve) in Luke 1:42.

6. Mary is revealed to be the spotless “Ark of the Covenant” in Luke 1.

7. Mary is revealed to be the “New Eve” in Luke 1:37-38; John 2:4; 19:26-27; Rev. 12, and elsewhere.

8. Mary is revealed to be free from the pangs of labor in fulfillment of Isaiah 66:7-8.

ASTROLOGERS BA ANG TATLONG MAGI KASI SINUNDAN NILA ANG MGA STARS?

$
0
0
The Three Wise Men giving their gifts to the Newly Born King.

The Three Wise Men giving their gifts to the Newly Born King.

Magi
They are NOT ASTROLOGERS but MEN O FAITH as well as ASTRONOMERS. They are scholars and not New Agers. They followed only ONE STAR AND NOT THE STARS.
They followed only ONE STAR, NOT THE STARS.
THEY FOLLOWED ONE STAR NOT THE STARS IT MEANS THEY ARE NOT ASTROLOGERS. ASTROLOGY IS SINFUL AND EVIL IN THE BIBLE AND ABOMINABLE TO GOD. THE MAGI ARE SCHOLARS, WISE MEN. THEY ARE ASTRONOMERS AND SPIRITUAL MASTERS AND THEOLOGIANS NOT ASTROLOGERS. SO PLEASE CORRECT YOUR STATEMENTS THAT THEY ARE ASTROLOGERS.
THE CHURCH CONDEMNS ASTROLOGY AND IT IS INCOMPATIBLE TO FAITH AND IS VIOLATION OF COMMANDMENT NO. 1. THE MAGI WHO ARE CATHOLIC SAINTS ARE NOT ASTROLOGERS:
CCC#2116 All forms of divination are to be rejected: recourse to Satan or demons, conjuring up the dead or other practices falsely supposed to “unveil” the future.48 Consulting horoscopes, ASTROLOGY, palm reading, interpretation of omens and lots, the phenomena of clairvoyance, and recourse to mediums all conceal a desire for power over time, history, and, in the last analysis, other human beings, as well as a wish to conciliate hidden powers. They contradict the honor, respect, and loving fear that we owe to God alone.
ASTRONOMY AND ASTROLOGY ARE NOT SYNONYMOUS IN JUDEO-CHRISTIAN FAITH. NO NO NO… ASTROLOGY IS CONDEMNED AS EVIL EVEN FROM OLD TESTAMENT AND THAT FAITH IS UPHELD BY CHRISTIANITY. THE CHURCH ALWAYS CONDEMN ASTROLOGY. EVEN HOROSCOPES, PALM READINGS, USE OF TAROT CARDS TO READ THE FUTURE, ETC. THEY ARE DEMONIC. BE CAREFUL ON WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.
ASTRONOMY IS THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF THE STARS SO THAT WE KNOW ABOUT THEM IN ACCORD WITH THE NATURAL LAWS OF NATURE. THIS IS ACCEPTABLE. ASTROLOGY IS READING AND STUDYING OF THE STARS TO GAIN POWER AND TO KNOW THE FUTURE WHICH IS EVIL. WHY? BECAUSE IT IS A DECEPTION. THE FUTURE IS NOT SET ON THE STARS BUT ON THE WILL OF GOD AND OUR OWN PERSONAL DECISIONS. ASTROLOGY IS EVIL AND DECEPTIVE.
ASTROLOGY IS FORTUNE TELLING AND TRYING TO PREDICT THE FUTURE. THAT IS ABOMINABLE TO THE LORD. IT IS WRONG IN TELLING THAT THE BIBLE AND TRADITION IS INCONCLUSIVE ON THE ISSUE. THE CCC HAS PRESENTED THE TRADITION OF THE CHURCH WHICH IS CONSISTENT AND FOUNDED ON THE BIBLE:
Dt 18:10-15 Let there not be found among you anyone who immolates his son or daughter in the fire, nor a fortune-teller, soothsayer, charmer, diviner, or caster of spells, nor one who consults ghosts and spirits or seeks oracles from the dead. Anyone who does such things is an abomination to the LORD, and because of such abominations the LORD, your God, is driving these nations out of your way. You, however, must be altogether sincere toward the LORD, your God. Though these nations whom you are to dispossess listen to their soothsayers and fortune-tellers, the LORD, your God, will not permit you to do so. A prophet like me will the LORD, your God, raise up for you from among your own kinsmen; to him you shall listen.
IN ITALIAN BIBLE:
Dt 18:10 [Nova Riveduta] “Non si trovi in mezzo a te chi fa passare suo figlio o sua figlia per il fuoco, né chi esercita la divinazione, né ASTROLOGO, né chi predice il futuro, né mago”
Jer 29:8-9 thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: Do not let yourselves be deceived by the prophets and diviners who are among you; do not listen to those among you who dream dreams. For they prophesy lies to you in my name; I did not send them, says the LORD.

THE TERM MAGO OR MAGI HAS VARIOUS MEANING. IT COULD MEAN SORCERER OR MAGICIAN OR WISEMEN. ST. MATTHEW USED IT FOR ‘WISE MEN’ NOT FOR MAGICIANS OR SORCERERS BECAUSE THOSE ARE CONDEMNED BY THE WORD OF GOD FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT.
THAT IS WHY AVOID MANGHUHULA OR FORTUNE-TELLERS, HOROSCOPES, READERS OF THE CARDS PRETENDING TO KNOW YOUR PAST AND FUTURE THEY ARE AGENDS OF THE DEVIL. ALSO FENG SHUI IS PAGAN AND CONTRARY TO THE FAITH.

ANO ANG ITSURA NG SERPIENTE NUNG LIKHAIN NG DIOS BAGO PA ITO ISUMPA NG DIOS?

$
0
0
Satan's Deception of Eve

Satan’s Deception of Eve

Splendor of the Church..ang inyong kapatid ay may tanong tungkol po dito.

Lumalabas kaz sa bible na “missing link”ang bagay na ito.
Kung nagkamali man po aq sa aking taong ay ipagpaumanhin niyo po.

Mapapansin po natin sa talata sa ibaba na hindi pa po gumagapang ang serpiente noong likhain ito ng Diyos.
Pero noong natukso niya si eba ay isinumpa na xa ng Diyos.

Tanong:ANO KAYA ANG ITSURA NG SERPIENTE NUNG LIKHAIN SIYA NG DIYOS?

Ito ay mababasa sa sumunod na
tatala ng Genesis 3:14: “At sinabi ng
Panginoong Dios sa serpiente, sapagka’t
ginawa mo ito ay sumpain ka ng higit sa
lahat ng mga hayop, at ng higit sa bawat
ganid sa parang; ang iyong TIYAN ang
ILALAKAD mo, at ang alabok ang iyong
kakanin sa lahat ng mga araw ng iyong
buhay.”

Merry Christmas

 

DAPAT UNAWAIN NG MABUTI ANG CONTEXT NG STORY. KAYA PALPAK ANG PAGKA INTINDI KASI INAAPLY SA ACTUAL NA AHAS ANG STORY NA ANG TINUTUKOY AY ANG DIABLO NA NAGKUNWARING AHAS PARA LOKOHIN SI EBA. ANG SERPIENTENG GUMAGAPANG SA LUPA AY MGA AHAS. ANG SERPIENTENG NANLOKO KAY EBA AY HINDI ORDINARIONG AHAS KUND SI SATANAS NA NAG ANYONG AHAS LANG. LATER INIHAYAG NG BIBLIA NA ITO AY HINDI BASTA AHAS KUNDI ‘DRAGON’. ITO AY ISANG DAMBUHALANG AHAS AT ITO AY SI SATANAS:

Rev 12:9 [Ang Biblia] “At inihagis ang malaking dragon, ang matandang ahas, ang tinatawag na Diablo at Satanas, ang dumadaya sa buong sanglibutan; siya’y inihagis sa lupa, at ang kaniyang mga anghel ay inihagis na kasama niya.”

ANO ANG ITSURA NG MGA AHAS NUNG LIKHAIN NG DIOS? KUNG ANO ANG ITSURA NILA NGAYON. KASI NILIKHA SILA NG DIOS AYON SA KANILANG ‘NATURE’ O LIKAS NA KALAGAYAN. ANG MGA ISDA SA TUBIG LUMALANGOY, ANG MGA IBON SA KALAWAKAN LUMILIPAD AT ANG MGA AHAS GUMAGAPANG SA LUPA.

ANG PARUSA NG DIOS KAY SATANAS NA GAGAPANG KA SA LUPA SPIRITUAL ANG KAHULUGAN NON. IBIG SABIHIN SIYA AY IBABAGSAK NG DIOS AT MAGIGING MABABA. THE LORD WILL DESTROY HIS PRIDE, AALISAN SIYA NG DANGAL AT KARANGALAN. CONDEMNATION ANG KAHULUGAN NIYON. SABI NGA ANG MGA PALALO AY IBABAGSAK AT ANG MGA MAPAGMATAAS AY IBABA NG DIOS [cf. Lk 1:52-53].

KAYA WAG PADALOS DALOS NG INTERPRETASYON. MALAYO ANG INTERPRETASYON MO.

PHILIPPINE COURT CITED POPE FRANCIS ON MERCY AND COMPASSION

$
0
0
Court cited Pope Francis on Mercy and Compassion in the case of Former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo

Court cited Pope Francis on Mercy and Compassion in the case of Former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo


Court cited Pope Francis as a “personification of mercy & compassion” in its Arroyo furlough decision.

(Photo via Adrian Ayalin)

IGLESIA NI MANALO BINAGO ANG STATEMENT NI POPE PIUS X PARA LINLANGIN MGA CATOLICO By Johndel Opiasa

Ang nagdiriwang ng tunay na diwa ng Pasko ay ang mga kinalulugdan lang ng Diyos.

$
0
0
Lucas 2:15-16 - Nang makaalis na ang mga anghel pabalik sa langit, ang mga pastol ay nag-usap- usap, "Tayo na sa Bethlehem! Tingnan natin ang pangyayaring ito na ibinalita sa atin ng Panginoon." Nagmamadali silang pumaroon at natagpuan nila sina Maria at Jose, at ang sanggol na nakahiga sa sabsaban.

Lucas 2:15-16 – Nang makaalis na ang mga anghel pabalik sa langit, ang mga pastol ay nag-usap- usap, “Tayo na sa Bethlehem! Tingnan natin ang pangyayaring ito na ibinalita sa atin ng Panginoon.” Nagmamadali silang pumaroon at natagpuan nila sina Maria at Jose, at ang sanggol na nakahiga sa sabsaban.

Ang mga kultong Arian gaya ng Iglesia ni Cristo, Saksi ni Jehovah, Mormons, atbp, at ang mga kultong Nestorian gaya ng Born Again at iba pang denominasyon ng Protestante ay hindi nagdiriwang ng Pasko o kapanganakan ng ating  pinakamamahal na Panginoong Diyos Jesucristo sapagkat hindi sila kinalulugdan ng Diyos.

Ang bukod tanging nagdiriwang ng TUNAY NA DIWA NG PASKO ay ang mga taong kinalulugdan ng Diyos na Kanyang pinaanyayahan sa kanyang mga anghel upang ipagbunyi ang bagong panganak na nagkatawang taong Diyos na si Jesucristo gaya ng mga mapagkumbabang mga pastol noong araw na iyon na siya namang ipinagpapatuloy ng mga Katoliko hanggang ngayon at magpakailanman.

Lucas 2: 1-20

Ang Pagsilang ni Jesus

(Mateo 1:18-25)

               Nang panahong iyon, iniutos ni Emperador Augusto na magkaroon ng sensus sa lahat ng nasasakupan ng Imperyo ng Roma.  Ang unang sensus na ito ay ginawa nang si Cirenio ang gobernador ng Siria.  Kaya’t umuwi ang bawat isa sa sari-sariling bayan upang magpatala.

               Mula sa Nazaret, isang lunsod sa Galilea, si Jose ay pumunta sa Judea, sa Bethlehem na bayang sinilangan ni Haring David, sapagkat siya’y mula sa angkan ni David.  Kasama niyang umuwi upang magpatala rin si Maria na kanyang magiging asawa, na noon ay kabuwanan na. 6       Habang sila’y nasa Bethlehem, sumapit ang oras ng panganganak ni Maria.  Isinilang niya ang kanyang panganay, na isang lalaki. Binalot niya sa lampin ang sanggol at inihiga sa isang sabsaban, sapagkat wala nang lugar para sa kanila sa bahay-panuluyan.

Ang mga Pastol at ang mga Anghel

               Doon ay may mga pastol na nasa parang at nagbabantay ng kanilang mga tupa nang gabing iyon.  Lumapit at tumayo sa kalagitnaan nila ang isang anghel ng Panginoon at nagliwanag sa kapaligiran nila ang nakakasilaw na kaluwalhatian ng Panginoon. Ganoon na lamang ang kanilang pagkatakot.  Ngunit sinabi sa kanila ng anghel, “Huwag kayong matakot! Ako’y may dalang magandang balita para sa inyo na magdudulot ng malaking kagalakan sa lahat ng tao.  Isinilang ngayon sa bayan ni David ang inyong Tagapagligtas, ang Cristong Panginoon.  Ito ang inyong palatandaan: matatagpuan ninyo ang isang sanggol na nababalot ng lampin at nakahiga sa isang sabsaban.”

               Bigla nilang nakitang kasama ng anghel ang isang malaking hukbo ng mga anghel sa kalangitan. Sila’y nagpupuri sa Diyos at umaawit,

               “Papuri sa Diyos sa kaitaasan, at sa lupa ay kapayapaan sa mga taong kinalulugdan niya!”

               Nang makaalis na ang mga anghel pabalik sa langit, ang mga pastol ay nag-usap- usap, “Tayo na sa Bethlehem! Tingnan natin ang pangyayaring ito na ibinalita sa atin ng Panginoon.”  Nagmamadali silang pumaroon at natagpuan nila sina Maria at Jose, at ang sanggol na nakahiga sa sabsaban.  Isinalaysay ng mga pastol ang sinabi ng anghel tungkol sa sanggol.  Namangha ang lahat ng nakarinig sa sinabi ng mga pastol.  Tinandaan ni Maria ang mga bagay na ito, at ito’y kanyang pinagbulay-bulayan.

               Umalis ang mga pastol na nagpupuri sa Diyos at nagpapahayag ng kanyang kadakilaan dahil sa lahat ng narinig nila at nakita, ayon sa sinabi sa kanila ng anghel.  (Lucas 2:1-20, Bagong Magandang Balita Biblia)

The Miracle of the Incarnation: God’s Personal Relationships By Mitchell Kalpakgian, Ph.D.

$
0
0
The Child Jesus with His Mother Mary being adored by the Magi

The Child Jesus with His Mother Mary being adored by the Magi

The Miracle of the Incarnation: God’s Personal Relationships

The Christmas season celebrates the Christian miracle of the Incarnation, almighty God becoming lowly man and eternal God assuming a mortal human nature. The God of power and might enters the world in the form of weakness as a helpless, dependent baby. The Lord who lives in the society of the Blessed Trinity where love circulates between Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in the never-ending giving and receiving of love enters into a humble human home to become a member of a human society—the family. God enters into human relationships when He becomes man. He joins a family, lives in a society, forms friendships, and creates a holy bond of fellowship with His disciples and followers. God is not a First Mover, a Clockmaker, or a remote deity, but a child in a family–a son related to all the relatives of his mother’s and foster father’s families.

weddingChrist in His human form is not only a member of the society of the family, the son of Mary and Joseph, but also a friend in the society of Mary, Martha, and Lazarus whose home He often visits. He belongs to a Jewish society, the tribe of Israel, and follows the traditions and laws handed down from Moses and the prophets. Christ forms his own society, the company of His disciples whom He leads and teaches to become apostles to evangelize all nations. God, then, becomes incarnate in the body to form close bonds and personal relationships of love with family, friends, and followers whom he embraces with special affection. The Incarnation reveals God’s great desire to be close and familiar to all who seek, know, follow, and love Him, and it sanctifies the family as the natural dwelling place of God.

Christ’s bond with His mother Mary reveals the intimate closeness of mother and son, so loving that God cannot say no to His mother at the marriage at Cana when she appeals to Him: “They have no wine”. God’s bond with Mary and Martha is so deep that Mary felt Lazarus would have lived if Christ had come earlier: “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died.” Sharing her great sorrow, Christ too mourns the loss of a beloved friend (“Jesus wept”), so touched by the sorrow of the sisters that He raises Lazarus from the dead. Christ’s bond with his disciples is also the same heartfelt union that goes beyond a formal teacher-disciple relationship, for Jesus calls them “friends,” those to whom he opens the depths of His heart and unburdens his soul. John, “the disciple whom Jesus loved”, lies close to the breast of Christ when He mentions his betrayal. St. Augustine experiences this closeness of God’s love on such a personal level that he writes in the Confessions, “You love us, Lord, as if we were the only one.” It is as if all who know Christ’s incarnate love feel like the many members of a family who all feel especially beloved like a favorite child, because everyone feels extraordinarily blessed and generously enriched. These are the relationships that Christ inspires in all who bond with Him.

In the Incarnation, Christ is the lover of souls, the bridegroom who seeks His beloved to enter into the mysterious oneness of spiritual love. The Church Fathers give to the Song of Solomon this allegorical reading: God is the Bridegroom and the soul is the bride, a union of intimacy that shares all the sensitivity and tenderness of marital love: “The voice of my beloved! Behold he comes, leaping upon the mountains, bounding over the hills, ” the bride rejoices. Just as the bride in the Song of Solomon awaits her beloved, the soul also longs for this union with God. As the Disciple says in Thomas a Kempis’s TheImitation of Christ, “My soul longs to receive your body; my heart yearns to be united to You.” The soul yearns for this relationship of love by adorning herself in the beauty of purity to receive her bridegroom: “Come, then, faithful soul; prepare your heart for your divine Spouse, that He may deign to come to you and dwell with you.” Throughout His human life, Christ touches hearts and wins souls with these most personal of human relationships. Mary of Bethany, for example, was so moved that she poured out all her expensive spikenard to wash the feet of her Lord as a small token of her gratitude for the greatness of Christ’s love.

The Incarnation makes possible all these personal human relationships, ties of affection, and intimate bonds between son and mother, Christ and beloved friends, master and disciple, and God and man. The miracle of Christmas reveals God as the Lord who enters history and becomes flesh in order to form these heart to heart unions with all men, to pour out all the love of his Sacred Heart–“burning furnace of charity”– for all who ask and seek, for all who have no wine, for all who all weep, for all who are burdened, for all who beg for forgiveness, for all who are possessed of demons, for all who thirst for the living water, and for all who pray for miracles. There is no limit or boundary to God’s relationships of love, and His gift at Christmas abounds and overflows for the whole world from Nazareth to the end of the earth and for all time throughout the ages of ages.

Mitchell Kalpakgian, Ph.D. has completed fifty years of teaching beginning as a teaching assistant at the University of Kansas, continuing as a professor of English at Simpson College in Iowa for thirty-one years, and recently teaching part-time at various schools and college in New Hampshire. As well as contributing to a number of publications, he has published seven books: The Marvelous in Fielding’s Novels, The Mysteries of Life in Children’s Literature, The Lost Arts of Modern Civilization, An Armenian Family Reunion (a collection of short stories), Modern Manners: The Poetry of Conduct and The Virtue of Civility, and The Virtues We Need Again. He has designed homeschooling literature courses for Seton Home School, and he also teaches online courses for Fisher More College and Fisher More Academy.
SOURCE:
http://www.truthandcharityforum.org/the-miracle-of-the-incarnation-gods-personal-relationships/

CBCP PRESIDENT ARCHBISHOP SOC VILLEGAS DENOUNCED ‘NO RELIGION’ SLOGAN ATTRIBUTED TO POPE FRANCIS

$
0
0
Pope Francis never stated NO RELIGION slogan. This is deceptive.

Pope Francis never stated NO RELIGION slogan. This is deceptive.

BEWARE!

The CBCP has been apprised of shirts now vended apparently in preparation for the Pope’s visit. While the words in the shirt attempt to convey the openness of the Holy Father, the phrases “NO RACE NO RELIGION” are definitely misleading and quite frankly erroneous.

Pope Francis is aware of the fact that he heads an organized religion with a vast membership throughout the world. He is also as aware that race forms part of the identity of individuals and of peoples.

He has never said and taught that religion and race do not matter, because they most certainly do. It is what selfish, uncharitable and judgmental people do with religion and race that is a problem.

We urge our Catholic faithful NOT to patronize items with misleading posts and statements.

December 29, 2014

+SOCRATES B. VILLEGAS
Archbishop of Lingayen Dagupan
CBCP President

AYAW SA BIRTHDAY NI JESUS MAS GUSTO ANG BIRTHDAY NG MGA WALANG KWENTANG MANALO NA HINDI PANGINOON AT HINDI TAGAPAGLIGTAS!

$
0
0
MATINDI ANG KAPAL NG APOG PAG SA DIOS DIOSAN NILA GINAGAWA ANG PAGSAMBA NG LARAWAN NG DEMONIO

MATINDI ANG KAPAL NG APOG PAG SA DIOS DIOSAN NILA GINAGAWA ANG PAGSAMBA NG LARAWAN NG DEMONIO

SABI NG INC NI MANALO

MGA BUGOK ANG KATOLIKO KASI NAG SABI NANG HAPPY BIRTHDAY JESUS

AKO: AT LEAST SI PAPA JESUS LORD YUN MAS BUGOK KA NAG SABI KA NANG HAPPY BDAY TATAY EDUARDO MANALO HAAHAHAHAHA

AYAW NILA SA PASKO KASI BDAY NI JESUS KASI DI DAW TOTOO SI KRISTO
PERO PAG BDAY NI MANALO GANYAN SILA KA TANGA!!!!!!!!


ABS-CBN’s statement on #PopeTYSM statement shirts

$
0
0
Logo credit to ABS-CBN Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABS-CBN]

Logo credit to ABS-CBN Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABS-CBN]

ABS-CBN assures the public that there was no intent to deceive or mislead the public through the commemorative shirts that carry statements inspired by Pope Francis’ message of love, openness, and humility.
We apologize if a particular statement shirt offended anyone.  We are pulling out the item from our online shop and all retail partner stores.
- Bong Osorio, ABS-CBN spokesman
Pope Francis never stated NO RELIGION slogan. This is deceptive.

Pope Francis never stated NO RELIGION slogan. This is deceptive.

CATHOLIC APOLOGIST FROM DEFENSORES FIDEI CARLOS ANTONIO PALAD CLARIFIED POPE FRANCIS’‘Who Am I to Judge?’

$
0
0
Pope Francis before the Cross of Jesus

Pope Francis before the Cross of Jesus

Netizen slams media misquotes on Pope

MANILA, Dec. 29, 2014—A concerned Catholic netizen has raised the alarm on the “irresponsible” way some media organizations cast an image of Pope Francis that, while popular, distorts his real views at the expense of his original intent.

Carlos Palad, a member of the Catholic groups Filipinos for Life and the Defensores Fidei Foundation, expressed resentment over how a television network has made the Holy Father seem to be espousing beliefs that directly go against official Church teachings through its papal t-shirt merchandise.

“Regarding the ‘No Religion’ t-shirt – who do they think the Pope is? An atheist? He is the head of the Roman Catholic Church, he has frequently spoken on the existence of Satan, he has insisted – both as cardinal and as Pope – on the importance of the Church,” he told CBCP News in an interview.

According to him, Pope Francis, as then Buenos Aires Archbishop Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio, in his book “Open Mind, Faithful Heart,” even declared that “we should feel for the Church the same devotion that we feel for the Virgin Mary”.

“He [also] insisted that to be fruitful and holy we must remain in the Church. This is obviously not a Pope who thinks that religion is not important. This is not a Pope who thinks that being Catholic is not important,” he shared.

Palad also wants to correct the popular but “false” notion Pope Francis’ famous rhetorical question “Who am I to judge?” has brought about, and which has since been quoted and requoted out of context given that the whole sentence reads: “If a gay person seeks God, who am I to judge him?”

“The Pope has condemned the ISIS. The Pope has condemned corruption. The Pope has condemned the Mafia. The Pope has condemned social injustices, as well as abortion. This is a Pope who condemns sin and organizations that promote sin. This is a Pope who judges,” Palad stressed.

“Obviously he does not mean that we should not condemn sin. He is simply repeating the old teaching that we should hate the sin and love the sinner. To illustrate this: we cannot say that someone will certainly go to hell. Only God knows that. But we can say that if someone keeps doing something bad, then he could go to hell,” he added. (Raymond A. Sebastián/CBCP News)

SOURCE: http://www.cbcpnews.com/cbcpnews/?p=48282

ONLINE PROTESTS FOR ABS-CBN TO WITHDRAW ALSO THE 2ND T-SHIRT STILL ON-GOING

BORN-AGAIN/BAPTIST PASTOR RICHARD SHAHAN ARRESTED FOR ALLEDGED MURDER OF WIFE TO MARRY HIS ‘BOYFRIEND’

$
0
0

alabama pastor accused of murdering wife-sanctified church revolution

Pastor, 53, arrested at the airport after ‘stabbing his wife to death was heading to Europe to marry his boyfriend’

  • Richard Shahan was arrested at Tennessee airport in January although he was required to stay in the country as police investigated his wife’s death
  • Claimed he had been with his son at the time of her death last July and that he was leaving the country for a three-year mission
  • But police said inconsistencies led them to suspect him
  • Prosecutors said 3,000 emails revealed ‘he was hoping to leave U.S. and eventually settle in the U.K., where he was going to marry his boyfriend’

An Alabama pastor who was arrested at the airport for allegedly stabbing his wife to death was attempting to fly to Europe to marry his boyfriend, prosecutors have said.

Richard Lee Shahan, 53, was arrested on January 1 as he boarded a plane from Nashville to Germany, six months after the body of his wife, Karen, was found at their house in Homewood.

Reports had initially suggested he was planning on going to Kazakhstan for a three-year mission trip as police – who had asked him to remain in the country – investigated his wife’s death.

But on Thursday, Prosecutor Leigh Gwathney told a Jefferson County District judge that information from more than 3,000 of Shahan’s emails showed he was hoping to leave the U.S. and never return.

Richard Shahan
Karen Shahan

Accused: Alabama pastor Richard Shahan, left, has been accused of stabbing his wife Karen, right, to death before attempting to board a plane to Germany so he could marry his boyfriend

The emails showed he was heading to Germany and then on to Kazakhstan, and ultimately planned to move to the United Kingdom, she said, AL.com reported.

‘He planned to become a citizen there and begin a new life with his boyfriend… who he intended to marry,’ Gwathney said. ‘He had no intention of ever returning to the United States. He had no home to return to and he had said his goodbyes to his family.’

Bond was set at $100,000, which he was expected to make, before remaining on house arrest.

Shahan had claimed that he was visiting one of their sons in Kentucky at the time of his wife’s death, but because the investigation was ongoing, he had been asked to stay in the country.

His defense, Wendell Sheffield and John Lentine, disputed claims that he was leaving the country for good and asked if there was actual ‘direct evidence’ of Shahan’s guilt.

'Revelations': Shahan appeared in court on Thursday, where prosecutors revealed their shocking claims

‘Revelations': Shahan appeared in court on Thursday, where prosecutors revealed their shocking claims

They argued that he was leaving the country for his mission trip in Frankfurt, which had been detailed in several newsletters and prayers cards in December.

Former life: Shahan, a once beloved pastor, later quit Birmingham's First Baptist Church

Former life: Shahan, a once beloved pastor, later quit Birmingham’s First Baptist Church

Shahan has been held in the Jefferson County Jail without bond since his arrest. A preliminary hearing has now been set for February 5.

The body of his 53-year-old wife Karen, who had been stabbed to death, was found on the morning of July 23 after she failed to show up for work. Officers said the house appeared to be in disarray.

After his wife’s death Shahan was put on paid administrative leave from the First Baptist Church. He had resigned from his post on December 31.

When his wife’s body was discovered, Shahan was questioned and kept in police cells for 48 hours.

He claimed he had been visiting one of the couple’s two sons in Kentucky at the time of the murder, and was released without charge. 

Homewood Police Chief Jim Roberson said ‘certain inconsistencies’ in the pastor’s interviews had led to officers to consider him as their main suspect.

Shahan had already checked in his luggage at the airport when he was stopped. He had been booked on to a flight to Frankfurt, but police claimed he had intended to then travel on to Russia.

 
Scene: Evidence is collected from the couple's home after Karen was found stabbed in July last year

Scene: Evidence is collected from the couple’s home after Karen was found stabbed in July last year

Crime scene: Shahan claimed he had been in Kentucky visiting one of their sons, but police said there were inconsistencies in his story and named him as the main suspect

Crime scene: Shahan claimed he had been in Kentucky visiting one of their sons, but police said there were inconsistencies in his story and named him as the main suspect

A statement from his First Baptist Church of Birmingham said: ‘All of us were saddened by the unexpected news that Richard Shahan was arrested by Homeland Security just moments before his planned flight departure for Frankfurt, Germany.’

‘There, he was to assume his new role working with the Children’s ministry of Bible Mission International, primarily in Kazakhstan.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2541359/Pastor-53-arrested-airport-stabbing-wife-death-heading-Europe-marry-boyfriend.html#ixzz3NKLpHNxi

SHORT ANSWERS TO ATHEIST’S OBJECTIONS ON GOD’S EXISTENCE

$
0
0

image

Who moved the Unmoved mover?

Answer: None. If the Unmovable mover can be moved it is no longer unmovable. The question is self refuting.

Who design the designer?

Answer: Same thing none. A designer does not need a designer of himself in order for him to make a design. In short it’s not a prerequisite.

If God created everything He created evil?

Answer:No. When we say God created everything it has a qualification. God created everything which is not contrary to His Divine Nature and Divine Will. Sin is not created by God but a consequence of the free will of the person for after all God does not create us as robots.

Can God lift a stone so heavy He cannot lift?

Answer: It depends on what concept of omnipotence of God you adhere. If the omnipotence concept you believe is the one that says God can do everything even if it contradicts logic, then He can lift a stone so heavy that at the same time He cannot lift. It is self contradiction but so what.? This concept of omnipotence allows it. However if you adhere to omnipotence concept of Saint Thomas Aquinas that God can do everything that is consistent to logic and His nature, then this question will be illogical and wrong to ask. In this concept, just as God cannot make a square circle for it is contradictory and illogical, it is also illogical to say that God can lift a stone so heavy that He cannot lift it for this statement is illogical and self-contradiction.

You cannot prove God exists.

Answer:It depends on what proofs you need.

Arguments are not proofs.

Answer:Look who’s talking? You just undo your statement because you yourself use arguments to prove that God does not exist.

Everything that cannot be explained by science is false.

Answer: Is this statement can be explained by using scientific method yes or no? If no then you just refute this statement.

Why is there evil if God exists?

Answer:Actually if evil exists it proves that there is a God. Why? Because evil exists only if there is an objective good. And the ultimate goodness can only be accounted to God Who is the Supreme Goodness Himself.

 

 

Viewing all 3780 articles
Browse latest View live