IS THE CRUCIFIED ONE GOD OUR SAVIOR OR HUMAN BODY ONLY? OUR ANSWER IS GOD!
Redentor de la Rosa
Father, paki cite nga ng sinulat ko na dineny ko ang formula na “God died”. I accused you that your original position was that the divinity was also affected by Christ’s death on the cross. If you want the truth and para mahinto nato, then I have a proposal to you. Provide a single statement where I denied the formula “God died.” I will also provide the statement where you said the divinity was affected. If you can prove your claim by providing us the statement coming from me, I will pay you 100,000 pesos. If I can provide your statement where you said the divinity was affected, you have to pay me 100,000 pesos. Let’s do this by signing a contract with a lawyer. Also, kelangan ang money is deposited already sa lawyer, kung baga money down. Ano po, agree? Kung di po kayo agree, useless lang po mga sinasabi nyo.
The Splendor of the Church
I WILL POST YOUR LIES SOON.
HERE IT,
A Response to Redentor De la Rosa
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Written in Red is my response and written in Black is quoted from Redentor’s blog.
I thought this issue already died but it was miraculously resurrected thus I have to take arms again and defend our Lord Jesus Christ and present the truthfulness of the teaching of the One, Holy, Apostolic Church.
**Some argued that only the human nature of Christ died on the cross since his divine nature cannot die? but is this right?**
This is not a matter of argument, but a dogma of the Church. Not only ‘only the human nature of Christ died’ but only his body died. Death means death of the biological body. The human soul of Christ (which has a human will and a human intellect) did not die, nor can it die. It “descended unto dead, and on the third day rose again” upon uniting with His body.
THERE HE IS. HE STUPIDLY CLAIM THAT ONLY THE HUMAN NATURE OF CHRIST DIED AND ONLY THE BODY. HE EVEN CLAIMED THEM AS DOGMAS OF FAITH. THIS GUY IS PLAIN STUPID. NO DOGMATIC DEFINITION FROM THE MAGISTERIUM OF THE CHURCH ON THESE. WHERE DID HE GET THEM? HE IS USING THAT WHILE CONTINUESLY OPPOSING OUR PRESENTATION OF GOD DIED TAKEN WORD FOR WORD FROM THE CATECHISM OF TRENT.
THAT WAS WAY BACK 2010 BUT NOW HE IS CHANGING POSITION. HE CLAIMS THAT HE DOESN’T REJECT ‘GOD DIED’. HOW STUPID AND FOOLISH. IF HE DIDN’T OPPOSE IT FROM THE VERY BEGINNING THEN THERE SHOULD BE NO DEBATE AND NO ARGUMENTATION. INSTEAD, THE CHARLATAN KEEPS ON OPPOSING THE GOD DIED TEACHING OF THE COUNCIL OF TRENT BUT EACH TIME HE IS OPPOSED HE SUDDENLY CLAIMS THAT HE IS NOT OPPOSING IT. WHAT A VERY TREACHEROUS HERETIC THIS ONE. IF HE BELIEVES AND PROFESS THAT GOD DIED ON THE CROSS THEN HIS DOGMA THAT ONLY THE HUMAN NATURE OF CHRIST DIED OR ONLY HIS BODY ARE ERRONEOUS AND HERETICAL. IF ONLY THE HUMAN BODY DIED THEN HE IS REFUTING THE TEACHING OF THE CATECHISM OF TRENT AND OF CCC AND OF THE COUNCIL OF EPHESUS AND CHALCEDON THAT THE ONE WHO DIED ON THE CROSS IS GOD BECAUSE JESUS IS GOD. IN
ADDITION, REDENTOR IS SHOWING HERE HIS BASIC IGNORANCE OF THE TEACHING OF THE CHURCH THAT DEATH IS NOT EXCLUSIVE OF THE BODY BUT THE SEPARATION OF THE BODY AND SOUL. THAT IS WHY THERE IS AN AGONY OF DEATH. THAT IS WHY WE CALL IT: THE PASSION OF THE LORD. DEATH INVOLVES THE ENTIRE PERSON NOT JUST THE BODY. HIS CONCEPT OF DEATH IS VERY SUPERFICIAL SHOWING BASIC STUPIDITY ON A VERY SIMPLE THING. THE CHARLATAN HAS NO LIMIT IN INVENTING DOGMAS BECAUSE HE IS IGNORANT OF THEM. NOW THE WHOLE CHURCH ENTERS INTO THE EASTER TRIDUUM TO COMMEMORATE THE PASSION AND DEATH OF THE LORD. IT IS INSULTING TO CATHOLIC FAITH TO CLAIM THAT ONLY THE BODY DIED.