Ang mga MALING ARAL sa PASUGO [part II] by: John D. Salvator

A book written by Eraño: “Ang Mga Pangunahing Doktrina ng Biblia”, 1995, page 64:
178. Magkasingkahulugan ba ang “wakas ng lupa” at “mga wakas ng lupa”? Hindi. Magkaiba ang ekspresyong “mga wakas na lupa” at ang ekspresyong “wakas ng lupa.” Ang wakas ng lupa ay ang ikalawang pagparito ng Cristo. (Hindi sa panahong ito lilitaw ang Iglesia ni Cristo sa Pilipinas)”

Tandaan ang sinabi ni Eraño;
Ang Wakas ng lupa –> ang ikalawang pagparito ng Cristo
Ang MGA Wakas ng lupa –> lilitaw ang Iglesia ni Cristo

Magkaiba daw itong dalawa??? Ating suriin.

Translation: 178. Are the expressions “end of the earth” and “ends of the earth” synonymous? No. The expressions “ends of the earth” and “end of the earth” are not the same. The end of the earth is the second coming of Christ.

180. Alin ang tinutukoy ni Cristo na “mga bagay na ito” na kapag nakita ay palatandaang malapit na ang wakas o nasa “mga wakas ng lupa”?

Ang kasabay ng pangyayari ay digmaang pangsanlibutan. Ang hunuhulaan dito na digmaang pangsanlibutan ay yaong sumiklab noong 1914 na tinatawag na Unang Digmaang Pangsanlibutan.

Samakatuwid, noong 1914 ay panahong “mga wakas ng lupa” na. Ito ang itinakda ng hula ….

Ganon? 1914 pala ang mga Wakas ng Lupa ayon kay Eraño Manalo. Subalit sa ibang pasugo sinabi naman na si Felix Manalo ay lilitaw sa Wakas ng Lupa, ibig ba sabihin nito na si Cristo at si Manalo ay sabay lumabas sa Wakas ng Lupa??? Paano mo ngayon pagdugtungin ito???

TRANSLATION:
The two expressions are different, Eraño Manalo said; and the meaning of the “end of the earth” is the second coming of Christ. In the Iglesia Ni Manalo, the second coming of Christ means the Judgment Day, which is the end of the world where everything will be consumed by fire.

Pasugo on July 1956, on Page 7
TITLED; “Ang Huling Sugo Ng Diyos Sa Wakas Ng Lupa” (The Last Messenger of God at the End of the Earth

Sa dalawang sunod na lathala tungkol sa paksang ito ay maliwanag at ating natitiyak, sa pamamagitan ng mga hula sa Banal na Kasulatan, na si Kapatid na Felix Manalo, ay huling sugo ng Diyos sa wakas ng lupa.

TRANSLATION:
Eraño Manalo said the expressions “end of the earth” and “ends of the earth” are not the same. What does the expression “end of the earth” mean again according to Eraño? “The end of the earth is the second coming of Christ.”

If we are to consider logic, Felix Manalo and Eraño Manalo’s doctrines would clearly contradict each other. What Felix Manalo taught before would not coincide with what Eraño Manalo teaches today. Felix Manalo Doctrine VS. Eraño MANALO Doctrine, alin ang tama sa dalawa???

In the Iglesia Ni Manalo’s doctrinal handbook, Mga Pangunahing Aral Na Sinasampalatayanan Ng Iglesia Ni Kristo (The Fundamental Doctrines the Iglesia Ni Kristo Believes In), published in 1989, on page 35:

TITLED: Kapatid Na Felix Manalo: Sugo Ng Diyos Sa Huling Araw (Brother Felix Manalo: Messenger of God in the Last Day)

That is a very Clear CONTRADICTIONS!!!

Now the question is, what year was the END of the WORLD? According to PASUGO;

Pasugo, November 1976, page 14
The appointed time for the worm Jacob is at the “end of the earth,” a time in history coinciding with the beginning of the first world war. One of the proofs that Brother Felix Manalo is the fulfillment of the prophesy regarding the worm Jacob is that he began preaching the Church of Christ and registered the same with the government in July 27, 1914.

What??? 1914 the END of the EARTH??? So how come they reach 100 years and still alive and kicking??? This was a clear propaganda just to deceive people @ that time…

Pasugo, May 1996, page 3
FELIX YSAGUN MANALO was born in Tipas, Taguig, Rizal on May 10, 1886. Living, he would have turned 110 years old this year. But, but 33 years ago, on April 12 1963, he was laid to rest from his labors at the age of 77 after administering the Church for almost half a century since late 1913.

Pasugo, July 1997, page 10
…In 1913, convinced that God had “called” him to preach the first-century Church of Christ which vanished after the death of the Apostles, he began preaching the Iglesia ni Cristo, stressing it was the same church founded by Christ. He began his ministry in a construction workers’ (AG and P) quarters in Punta Sta. Ana, Manila using the Bible as his primary authority. After several nights of preaching, he was able to convert 14 believers whom he baptized as pioneer members.

Pasugo, May 1998, page 5
Brother Felix Y. Manalo began preaching way back in 1914. He was instrumental as God’s messenger in the emergence of the Iglesia ni Cristo in the Philippines which was registered in that same year. He therefore, is the fulfillment of the prophecy regarding the third angel, and the Iglesia ni Cristo, without any doubt.

Pasugo, March/April 1993, page 7
“The true Church or religion must be proven by biblical prophecies. But false teachers and false religions can easily point to numerous biblical prophecies and claim that these have been fulfilled in their persons or churches.”

As you can see, since the beginning, a Felix Manalo has been using many propagandas just to deceive people and to join him. Claiming himself a Prophet the last messenger, the third angel, and etc. Jesus was the last messenger and not MANALO or even his family, the MANALOS came late in the history of Christianity. Jesus Christ is the true God, and Felix y Manalo merely self proclaimed himself to be God’s last messenger. If Felix were God’s messenger then he would not have told lies about Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. If Felix was God’s messenger (Jesus Christ’s messenger) then he would have told people the truth that our greatest need in life is to be forgiven, and this forgiveness that we ALL need has been provided in the person and the work of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, the sinless Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Our ultimate need of believing or trusting in the saving work of Jesus Christ death on the cross and resurrection from the dead is ignored and instead we are told that our problem in life is that we are not members of the INC and we will be DOOMED to eternal Fire, what a LIE.

12. INC also change their minds and change there DOCTRINE, nagkamali yata noong una.

Pasugo, September 1953, on page 32: Titled: Ang Kahulugan Ng “Mga Wakas Ng Lupa”May mga tumututol sa amin na yaon daw salitang “Mga Wakas Ng Lupa”, ay tumutukoy raw sa dako, samakatuwid isang lugar. Ang gayong pagtutol ay aming igagalang kailanma’t may matibay na pinagsasaligan. Datapuwa’t kung wala, ang gayong pagtutol ay ibibilang naming isang kamangmangan. Bakit kami naniniwalang hindi dako o isang lugar ang tinutukoy ng pariralang “Mga Wakas Ng Lupa?” Sapagka’t ayon sa siyensiya ang mundo ay hindi lapad (flat) kundi bilog.

Tandaan ang sinabi ni Eraño;
Ang Wakas ng lupa –> ang ikalawang pagparito ng Cristo
Ang MGA Wakas ng lupa –> lilitaw ang Iglesia ni Cristo

Ngayon binago na naman…
Ang mga WAKAS ng LUPA ay hindi katapusan ng Mundo kundi isang malayong Lugar at Panahon???

*This is the explanation of Pasugo. According to their official publication, they do not believe that the expression “ends of the earth” refers to place, but to time.

VS.

Pasugo on March 1998, on page 5;
The Scriptures specify that the calling of God’s sons and daughters from the Far East would begin at the “ends of the earth.” The expression “ends of the earth” PERTAINS BOTH TO PLACE AND TIME.

PLACE and TIME vs. TIME and not PLACE vs. PLACE??? Ano ba talaga??? What is wrong with the INC 1914 Doctrine???

Was the INC of Manalo decided to change its doctrine? Or it’s just plain simple CONFLICT? Either way, we can clearly see what kind of false doctrine they have. Anong magkaibang talata yung tinutukoy daw? Bakit hindi ninyo sagutin ng maayos at puro nasagot na yan, doon, dito, etc. Eh sa dami ng tao sa buong mundo, kahit nasagot nyo na, di ba marapat na ipaliwanag nyo doon sa hindi nakakaalam ng sagot ninyo? O halatang umiiwas?

KALUKUHAN ang katuruan ng Iglesia Ni MANALO, ang “mga WAKAS ng LUPA” raw tumutukoy sa dako, samakatuwid isang lugar, binago na naman??? Suriin nating mabuti, paano maging dako o isang lugar ang tinutukoy ng pariralang “Mga Wakas Ng Lupa” kung ang mundo natin ay bilog??? Ginagawa nilang katawa tawa ang manunulat ng Bibliya kung sa gayon ang pagkaintindi nila ay isang Lugar. Wala naman pung wakas ang lupa sa Mundo dahil bilog ito, paikot ikot ka lang, hindi po FLAT ang mundo.

13. Who founded the INC? SINO ANG NAGTATAG NG INK (INC)? Si Kristo ba?

Basahin at alamin kung ano ang nakasaad sa kanilang PASUGO;

PASUGO May 1963, p. 13: “Noong tumalikod ang bayang Israel at sumamba sa diyus-diyosan ay nagsugo ang Dios upang magtatag ng Iglesia”

TRANSLATION:
“When Israel turned away and worshipped false gods, God sent someone to establish His church”.

PASUGO September 1940, p. 1: “Dapat malaman ng lahat, ayon sa Bagong Tipan, ang tunay na INK ay si Cristo ang nagtatag sapagkat siya ang sinugo ng Dios sa pagtatag nito”.

Tandaan;
Si Kristo daw po ang nagtatag ng INK.

TRANSLATION:
“Everyone should know, according to the New Testament, that the true INC is the church founded by Christ because he was the one sent by God to establish it”.

PASUGO November 1940, p. 23: “Iisa lamang ang tanging makapagtatayo ng Iglesyang magiging dapat sa Dios. Kung sino – ang ating Panginoong Jesu-Cristo lamang! Sino mang tao – maging marunong o mangmang, maging dakila o hamak – ay walang karapatang magtayo nang Iglesya”.

Tandaan;
Si Kristo daw po ang nagtatag ng INK at wala ng iba pang makapagtatayo dito.

TRANSLATION:
“There is only one who can establish the Church which will be of God – that is, our Lord Jesus Christ only! Any man – literate or illiterate, great or simple – does not have the right to establish the Church”.

PASUGO May 1968, p. 7: “Ang tunay na INK ay iisa lamang. Ito ang Iglesyang itinayo ni Cristo. Kung mayroon mang nagsisibangon ngayong mga Iglesya at sabihing sila man ay Iglesya ni Cristo rin, ang mga ito ay hindi tunay na Iglesya ni Cristo kundi huwad lamang”.

Tandaan;
Si Kristo daw po ang nagtatag ng INK at wala ng iba pang makapagtatayo dito, kung meron man daw na nagtayong iba ay hindi TUNAY… Malinaw???

TRANSLATION:
“There is only on true Church of Christ. This is the Church founded by Christ. If there be churches TODAY which will rise and claim that they are also the Church of Christ, these are not the true Church of Christ but are FALSE CHURCHES only”.

Panno naman itong nakasulat sa PASUGO ni ang isang tao na si Felix Manalo ay nagtatag ng sarili nyang Iglesia. Di bat si Kristo lamang ang makakapag patayo ng Iglesia? So lumalabas na PEKE itong itinayo ni MANALO…

PASUGO Agosto-Setyembre 1964, p.2:
“Sino ang sinugo ng Dios upang magtatag ng Iglesya sa Pilipinas? Sa Isaias 46:11, ay ganito ang sabi: “na tumatawag ng ibong mandaragit mula sa silangan ang taong gumagawa ng aking payo mula sa malayong lupain”. Ayon sa mga kumakaaway sa INK sinasabi raw sa Rehistro na si Felix Manalo ay nagtatag ng INK”.

TRANSLATION:
“Whom did God send to establish the Church in the Philippines? In Isaiah 46:11, it has been said: “Calling a ravenous bird from the east, the man that executeth my counsel from a far country”. According to those who oppose the INC, the Registry says that Felix Manalo established the INC”

PASUGO Mayo 1967, p.14:
“Sa panahong ito ng mga wakas ng Lupa na nagsimula sa unang Digmaang Pandaigdig ay tatawag ang Dios sa kanyang huling sugo upang itatag ang kanyang huling Organisasyon. Kung gayon ang INK na lumitaw sa Pilipinas noong 1914, ay siyang Organisasyong Pinangunahan o Pinamahalaan ni Felix Manalo”.

TRANSLATION:
“In the days of the ends of the Earth that started in the First World War, God will call on his last messenger to establish his last Organization. Therefore, the INC which appeared in 1914 is the Organization Headed or Administered by Felix Manalo”

PASUGO Hulyo 1955, nasa panakip:
“Iyon ang Iglesya ni Cristo na dapat pasukan ng lahat ng tao; at ang tanging sugo’y si kapatid na Felix Manalo”.

TRANSLATION:
“That is the Church of Christ that all men must join; and the one and only messenger is our brother Felix Manalo.”

PASUGO Agosto-Setyembre 1964, p. 5: “Kailan napatala sa Pamahalaan o narehistro ang INK sa Pilipinas? Noong Hulyo 27, 1914. Tunay na sinasabi sa rehistro na si Kapatid na F. Manalo ang nagtatag ng INK.”

TRANSLATION:
“When was the INC in the Philippines registered? In July 27, 1914. It is true that the registry says that Brother F. Manalo is the one who founded the INC.”

Sino daw ba talaga ang nagtatag? Ayon sa nakasulat, yan ay walang iba kundi si Felix Manalo… Ang Iglesia palang ito ay tatag ng TAO!!!

At sinabi pang sinugo daw po si MANALO na magtayo ng Iglesia sa PILIPINAS. Ilang beses ba tinayo ni JESUS ang kanyang Iglesia???

Basahin natin sa Matthew 16:18 na nagsasabi; “17 And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. 18″I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it. 19″I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.”…

The Church was Established by JESUS Himself, wala siyang sinugo na para tumayo ng Iglesia, kalukuhan ang sinasabi ni MANALO para makaakit at makaluko ng TAO.

Meron pabang pangalawang Iglesia na itatayo? Kalukuhan na naman yan, dahil ang iglesia ni JESUS ay hindi maagaw ng kahit na sino dahil sasamahan niya ito hanggang sa katapusan ng MUNDO. Basahin natin sa Matthew 28:19-20

19″Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.”

Kung sinabi sa Bibliya na hindi masisira o maagaw ang Iglesia nino man, paano sasabihin na may isang tao na inutusang tumayo ng Iglesia, kung may nauna ng nakatayo??? At sino ba itong naunang Iglesia na nakatayo… Ating basahin sa pasugo ang pag amin;

“Pasugo Magasine, July-August 1988, page 6- “Even secular history shows a direct time link between the Catholic church and the Apostles, leading to the conclusion that the TRUE CHURCH OF CHRIST IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH”

Pasugo Magasine, April 1965, Page 41, by Bro. C. P. Sandoval- “So we don’t question the claim of the Catholic apologist, that the Catholic Church alone could trace back its origin to the apostles.”

Malinaw na sinabi sa PASUGO na ang ORIHINAL na Iglesia na tinayo ni JESUS noong 33AD ay walang iba kundi ang Iglesia KATOLIKA at patuloy itong nakatayo hanggang sa kasalukuyang panahon….