President Aquino’s insulting speech against the Filipino clergy only showed that his public display of affection for Pope Francis seems hypocritical
FULL TEXT: Aquino’s speech in the presence of Pope Francis at Malacañang
Your Holiness:
Colonialism was brought to our shores, partly by the efforts of the conquistadores, and partly through the efforts of the Church. When the clergy in that period was asked how they justified the injustices committed during the colonization of the Philippines, they responded by saying: the Kingdom of God is not of this earth.
With Vatican II however, this changed: Instead of being a pillar of the establishment, the Church began to question the status quo. My understanding of the changes inspired by Vatican II, and of the influence of liberation theology, was the notion that temporal matters affect our spiritual well-being, and, consequently, cannot be ignored. Two passages from scripture come to mind.
The first comes from Matthew, Chapter 22, Verses 36-40, in which a Pharisee posed this question to Jesus Christ, “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” And He said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord Your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, ‘you shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.”
The clear link between the two greatest commandments, as Christ put it, is further emphasized in another passage. In Matthew Chapter 25 Verses 35-36, Christ said, “For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.’”
The Gospel challenges each member of the Church to go beyond almsgiving and mere charity, and to be concerned with injustice in temporal matters. We were further taught that if we do not intercede to make each person capable of exercising true freedom of choice, then we are not our brother’s keepers. One of the examples given to us involved a certain question. If it is a sin to steal, who is the greater sinner: the desperate man in an impossible situation forced to steal to feed his starving family, or the politician with an insatiable greed who, despite not having real material needs, stole from the public coffers?
When the Church engaged in temporal matters, it was truly working to bring the Kingdom of God apparent in this world. It was a living Church, a source of nurturing and support for the faithful, at a time when movies like “The Cardinal,” “The Shoes of the Fisherman,” and even “Jesus Christ Superstar” elicited deeper thoughts on how to further deepen the faith.
These teachings have been central to my family’s advocacy, which is understandable considering what we, along with millions of Filipinos, went through under the dictatorship. Then-President Marcos declared Martial Law in 1972, when I was 12-years-old, beginning an era in which the most fundamental rights of many Filipinos were flagrantly and routinely violated. It was in this environment that I came of age. In a sense, I had a front row seat to that tyranny and persecution. After all, the dictator wasted no time in having my father, one of his most influential and vocal opponents, imprisoned.
Martial Law deprived our family not only of a loving husband and father. Many of our friends avoided us. There were few who dared speak up. One of those was Fr. Toti Olaguer, SJ, who, right in the heart of the dictator’s most secure prison, had the courage to speak the truth about Mr. Marcos’ abuses, even as he was being videotaped. Many others in the Church, such as Jaime Cardinal Sin, Bishop Francisco Claver, and Bishop Antonio Fortich, just to name just a few, truly lived their faith and acted as followers of Christ in being their brothers’ keepers.
The courage and daring displayed by the clergy solidified my belief: Especially during the Martial Law years, the Church of the poor and oppressed shone vividly. The clergy was always at the forefront of those wanting to emulate Christ and carry the burdens for all of us. Indeed, they nourished the compassion, faith, and courage of the Filipino people. This allowed millions to come together as a single community of faith and make possible the miracle of the EDSA People Power Revolution.
Perhaps we had grown so accustomed to having this Church, always at the forefront of championing the rights of all, especially those of the marginalized, that we found it hard to understand its transformation. We were taught that the Catholic Church is the true church, and that there is constancy, for it upholds the truth at all times.
Hence, there was a true test of faith when many members of the Church, once advocates for the poor, the marginalized, and the helpless, suddenly became silent in the face of the previous administration’s abuses, which we are still trying to rectify to this very day. In these attempts at correcting the wrongs of the past, one would think that the Church would be our natural ally. In contrast to their previous silence, some members of the clergy now seem to think that the way to be true to the faith means finding something to criticize, even to the extent that one prelate admonished me to do something about my hair, as if it were a mortal sin. Is it any wonder then, that they see the glass not as half-full, or half-empty, but almost totally empty. Judgment is rendered without an appreciation of the facts.
I understand I am only human, and thus, I am imperfect. I ran for the Presidency despite my discomfort with the trappings of power, because if I passed up on this opportunity to effect real change, I would not have been able to live with myself, especially if the situation worsened. But in this effort, the participation of all is necessary. Everything I have said has not been to criticize, but to speak the truth, for the truth shall set us all free. If we are able to settle our differences, can we not benefit our people quicker?
This is why I was struck by what Your Holiness recently said to the Curia, when you warned them of the illnesses that not only Christians, but anyone in a position of power, is prone to, including that of thinking one’s self immortal or indispensable, and the danger of becoming sowers of discord through gossip and grumbling.
I appreciate and respect Your Holiness, for your role as a unifying and revitalizing voice, not just among Catholics, but also among all peoples of goodwill. Your statements bear witness to the compassion and understanding of Christ. Exhibiting the same humility, you eschew the trappings of your position, even to the necessary security preparations, which, I should admit, has been somewhat of a security nightmare for us. [Laughter] In all seriousness, who can deny that Your Holiness is truly living the life of one who is dedicated to advocating for the oppressed and marginalized?
I believe that you are a kindred spirit, one who sees things as they are, and is unafraid of asking, “Why not?” Some of your statements might have been shocking or offensive to some peers. But Your Holiness is meant to be the instrument through which the Kingdom of God is allowed to flourish. In your example, we see the wisdom of continuing to ask, “Why not?” We see joy, a sense of authentic service, and an insistence on a true community of the faithful. We thank the Lord for other kindred spirits like Luis Antonio Cardinal Tagle, Father Catalino Arevalo, and Sister Agnes Guillen, who have always been voices of reason, and who are spiritual people who will always be natural allies, along with so many others. We would like to think that even more will join us in the truth, in the fullness of time.
In the fight to transform society, one cannot help but be heartened by the fact that we are not alone. When we tread this path with people such as yourself, along with the millions you have inspired, we gain the courage to do what needs doing, the optimism to dream about what we can achieve in unity with one another, and the opportunity to turn that dream into a shared reality, with the grace of Almighty God. The Filipino people, in whose name I welcome you today, ask your blessing; may we find more mercy and compassion in our lives.
Thank you. Good day.
Pope Francis looked surprised listening to the insulting speech of the President in Malacanan
The speech of President Aquino was immature and careless and insensitive. The Filipinos loved the Friars and the Catholic Church during colonization because those missionaries built their first schools, hospitals, orphanages, taught them Alphabets, made their maps and preserved their literature. When Filipino revolutionaries tried to kill or imprisoned the Spanish missionaries they were defended and protected by the Filipino people. The president is deceived by her atheist-pro communist advisers.
During the Martial Law period when the Marcos Dictatorship closed the Congress, controlled the Media and arrested opposition leaders Jaime Cardinal Sin and the Filipino clergy became the voice of the masses. That is why Cardinal Sin is now enshrined as a national hero. He was the voice that toppled the Dictatorship. The president’s late Mother, the former President Corazon Aquino honored and loved and respected Cardinal Sin and the Filipino clergy for their courage to oppose the tyranny and to defend the poor.
During the reign of the Arroyo Administration the Bishops and the Filipino clergy were once again very vocal in condemning corruption and the social ills. It was Mr. Benigno Aquino III then Congressman and later Senator who was rarely seen or heard opposing the previous government. He was mostly SILENT and USELESS as legislator. The people voted him thinking that being the son of his parents he will uphold their values and their love of the Catholic Faith but the people are mistaken.
Having the Pope as visitor whose concern is the Poor, especially those affected by the SUPER TYPHOON HAYYAN which killed more than 15,000 Filipinos we expect the President to talk about the government program for the affected. Instead, THE PRESIDENT DIDN’T TALK ABOUT THE POOR AND THE FLIGHT OF OUR AFFECTED BRETHREN HE INSTEAD BLAMES THE PAST FOR THE PRESENT PROBLEM and much worse he blames the heroic clergy for his very own SOCIAL IRRESPONSIBILY AND INCOMPETENCE.
If our Bishops and Priests were not doing well for the poor and the downtrodden, how come our people LOVE THE CHURCH AND THE POPE SO MUCH? That love of God, of the Church, of the Faith and of the Pope is not out of a vacuum. It is the FRUIT OF THE HARDWORKS AND DEDICATION AND HEROIC SERVICE OF OUR PRIESTS, NUNS AND OUR OWN PARENTS.
For us Filipinos what he did was INSULTING. We do not do that to our visitors. The President can criticize any day he wants but not slap it on the Pope. He was delivering the speech for the Pope and not for the Bishops. HE USED THE POPE TO CRITICIZE THE BISHOPS AND THAT US UNGENTLEMANLY.
He can wait after the the Guest is gone and then he can engage the Bishops in public exchange of ideas on social and moral issues. In Filipino culture what the President did was stabbing opponent through the face of his own father. A subtle act of treachery when every body were in festive mood. It was an attack on Thanksgiving Day for an American to understand. If you want a World War II comparison it was PEARL HARBOR disguised as a WELCOMING PARTY.
HIS CRITICISM IS ACTUALLY UNFOUNDED.
It is not true that the Bishops threatened to excommunicate him. Our Bishops are actually very kind to him. We opposed the RH Bill with all our strength while the President wasted BILLIONS OF GOVERNMENT MONEY to buy politicians to vote for RH Bill and the Impeachment of the Supreme Court Chief Justice. He won in Congress but the Supreme Court struck down all the provisions that will compel Filipinos to support it with penalties. His victory is EMPTY and the RH Law is now A TOOTHLESS TIGER.
He is angry because ONLY THE BISHOPS HAVE MORAL AUTHORITY TO STAND BEFORE HIM AND REMIND HIM OF HIS INCOMPETENCE.
The President can criticize but he should study well the issues before he open his mouth. His concerns were petty and self-serving.
Pnoy lacks professional and political savviness and sensitivities. Pnoy blames Gloria Arroyo for all the shortcomings and spread of poverty in his administrations. Pnoy being the leader must find legal ways and means to uplift the social and economic conditions of majority of the population and not be complacent about the upgrade of Philippine credit rating and growth which only benefits the capitalist rich elite and businessmen. He must see to it that the economic growth trickles down to the lowest stratum of society….the HUNGRY POOR! Pnoy cannot resort to PDAF and DAP funds to promote the well-being of the people, instead it become a source for political corruption of the political vultures. He uses this funding to reign in and control Congress which is helpless but only enriches its members, after all Pnoy does not have any pet bills he wants pass to alleviate hunger or provide good jobs. In fact , the law which people demand, like the FOI, Anti-Dynasty and other social amelioration bills have not been certified by Pnoy to congress as urgent to require immediate congressional actions. Pnoy is busy responding to critics for well-founded criticism of his administration, the onus of which he passes on to previous government of Arroyo. He was elected to rectify the misjudgment or maladministration of previous management not just to blame and do nothing. Pnoy is just joke bad manager and irresponsible leader whom the people expected to lead them to prosperity and good transparent governance but only good to cover up his allies and cabinet members and his KKK for misdeeds and corruptions. Pnoy will leave a legacy of very bad governance and palpable widespread of hunger and proliferation of poor families!
Wala talagang pinipiling okasyon ang kalbong Penoy. Tinira na naman ang mga paring critical sa kaniyang pamamalakad harapan sa Papa at mga pari. Ubo pa nang ubo!!
