Rodimus the deceiver
OF ALL COWARDS AND PAGANS WHO HAVE DEPARTED FROM THE TRUTH IS THIS RODIMUS THE LIAR.IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE HAS MADE A FOOL OUT OF HIMSELF AND HIS COWARDLINESS HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN. LOOK LOOK GUYS, RODIMUS THE LIAR CONTINUED TO EXPOSE HIS TOYS AS ASUAL WITH HIS AMATEUR APOLOGETICS TACTICS IMBUED WITH SILLY AND CHILDISH ARGUMENTS. NOW I SET FORTH TO ANSWER THIS TREACHEROUS AND HATE FILLED HERETIC.
“As expected, Mr. Aloysius Kayiwa would post his hostile response to our first expose of him.”
HAHAHAHA! OFCOURSE I HAD TO RESPOND. COWARDS LIKE YOU DON’T DESERVE A DAMN. IF YOU PRICKLE US WITH NEEDLES, WE SHALL ANSWER WITH BOMBS. MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT THAT. WE ARE QUALIFIED TO REFUTE LIARS AND COWARDS LIKE YOU. EXPOSE WHO? ME? YOU’VE GOT TO BE KIDDING. DEAR RODIMUS THE LIAR, YOU WERE EXPOSED LONG AGO FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO SEE.STOP YOUR PRETENCE.
OH! WE REMEMBER WELL HOW USED TO SPREAD YOUR IGNORANCE IN THE INTERNET WITH IMPUNITY. DO YOU REMEMBER RODIMUS THE LIAR WHEN YOU QUIT THE BATTLE FIELD WHEN ATTY LLASOS, FR.ABE AND ET AL EXPOSING YOU FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO SEE. EVEN YOUR OWN PROTESTANTS DISOWNED YOUR ARGUMENTS AS CHILDISH AND STUPID. UNFORTUNATELY FOR A STUPID PERSON LIKE YOU, YOU WILL CONTINUE IN YOUR HARLOTRY. YOU CAN ROT IN IT BUT STOP IMPOSING IT ON OTHERS.
“Like I said in the comments section of his response article, his arguments is only 30% of the article because the rest of it are all ad hominems (attacking the person to discredit his argument).”
OH! RODIMUS THAT IS SO GREAT THAT ONLY 30% OF MY ARTICLE CRUSHED YOUR TOYS AND LIES. YOU ARE CREATING YOUR OWN DEFEAT SINCE WE SHALL RETURN THE ATTACKS YOU THROW AT US. COWARDS AND HERETICS LIKE YOU DON’T NEED TO BE GIVEN A DAMN. YOU WILL SUFFER WOUNDS. IF ITS OKAY FOR YOU TO ATTACK OTHERS, THEN IT IS OUR ROLE AS CATHOLICS TO RESPOND. YOU USE HATRED AND LIES TO ATTACK OTHERS BUT WHEN WE RESPOND IN THE SAME MEASURE-WITH MUCH FORCE- YOU CRY FOUL. NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU WHIN, YOU WILL BE CLOBBERED AND DESTROYED. YOU ARE NOT CUTE TO DESERVE SYMPATHY, YOU ARE PATHETIC AND WILD. ANY WAY, I KNOW ALL ABOUT AD HOMINEMS AND OTHER FALLACIES,MANY OF WHICH YOU ARE GUILTY IN YOUR ANTI-CATHOLIC MINISTRY OF SHAME. REMAIN SILLY.
“It is so funny that he criticizes the likes of Eliseo Soriano of the Ang Dating Daan (the old path) cult who is notorious for defaming their opponents on air without realizing that Mr. Kayiwa is doing the same thing.”
HAHAHA! YOU MEAN MAMA ELI THE HOMOSEXUAL RAPIST? IT IS FOR NO REASON THAT I CRITICIZE MAMA ELI. ARE YOU LAWYERING FOR THAT CRIMINAL? AND WHY DOES MAMA ELI COME IN HERE? HAHAHA. IT IS THAT A RED-HERRING? ITS NOW OBVIOUS RODIMUS THE LIAR THAT YOU AND MAMA ELI ARE ALL CHARLATANS. CHARLATANS PRETENDING TO BE WISE. YOU AND MAMA ELI ARE CULTISTS, YOU AND MAMA ELI ARE BOTH ANTI-CATHOLICS, YOU AND MAMA ELI ARE BOTH IDIOTS, COWARDS AND BASTARDS. WHAT WILL YOU BENEFIT FROM THIS HARLOTRY? DEAR RODIMUS, IF YOU THINK THAT YOU WILL ATTACK CATHOLICISM AND GO SCOT FREE WITH IT, FORGET. WE SHALL RESPOND WITH MUCH FORCE. THE KNIVES YOU THROW AT US WILL BE RETURNED IN EQUAL MEASURE EVEN WITH GREAT FORCE. MAKE SURE YOU DON’T APPEAR IGNORANT, OTHERWISE YOU WILL SUFFER WOUNDS. FOR MAMA ELI, LEAVE HIM ALONE TO ME, I WILL DEAL WITH HIM AS I WILL DEAL WITH YOU. I FEAR NOTHING FROM SATAN’S MINIONS LIKE YOU. CRY CRY BABY!
“We won’t stoop that low because we want the readers to focus on arguments for their consideration.”
YOU AND WHO? OKAY NO PROBLEM. IF YOU WANT TO ARGUE, WE SHALL ARGUE. AS I SAID I FEAR NOTHING FROM THE LIKES OF YOU.IF YOU THOUGHT UGANDAN’S LIKE ME ARE THAT LOW, THEN YOU WILL LEARN YOUR LESSON WELL.AM NOT SCARING YOU, IT IS A FACT.
“Before we give our response to Mr. Kayiwa’s article, let’s give our responses to some funny stuffs.”
YOU AND WHO RODIMUS THE LIAR? CAN’T YOU SEE HOW SAD THAT REALLY IS? GO ON RODIMUS WITH YOUR TOYS. THE BALL IS NOW IN YOUR COURT.
“First the title given to me: “BORN AGAIN PASTOR GERRY SOLIMAN”. That really nice, but Mr. Kayiwa’s integrity already declined on this one: I am not a pastor. In fact, I hold no authoritative position in church. I’m just a mere member.”
GOOD YOU CLARIFY! BUT WE KNOW YOU ARE THE HIDING COWARD…..ALWAYS HIDING YOUR IDENTITY. THE OTHER TIME YOU HID IN AN IDENTITY OF A ROBOT, THEN ATTY LLASOS THOUGHT YOU ARE A BEREAN, THEN FR.ABE THINKS YOU ARE A BAPTIST PASTOR, THEN OTHERS THINK YOU AN INC MEMBER, DUANE YAN THINKS YOU ARE A BORN AGAIN PASTOR ETC. WHEN WILL YOU DESIST FROM YOUR COWARDLY BEHAVIOR RODIMUS THE COWARD? WHY CANT YOU BE GENTLE MAN ENOUGH AND REVEAL YOUR IDENTITY? MAY BE YOU WAN’T TO REMAIN BEHAVING SATAN. WE ARE DEALING WITH A TREACHEROUS AND DECEPTIVE FELLOW HERE.
“Second, his denial that he is a resource person:”
DON’T BE SILLY RODIMUS THE LIAR. AM STAFF APOLOGIST AND CORRESPONDENT FOR AFRICA. WAS IT HARD FOR YOU TO MENTION THAT?THAT IS WHAT YOU HAD TO MENTION OTHER THAN DEVISING YOUR OWN TOYS ABOUT ME. YOU ARGUE LIKE A KID. CAN’T YOU GROW UP?
“Let’s satisfy his curiosity and search the web on the definition of a resource person:”
ALL THAT IS A WASTE OF TIME AND BANDWIDTH. AM SIMPLY AN APOLOGIST AND CORRESPONDENT FOR SPLENDOR. YOU HAD TO MENTION THAT, NO MORE NO LESS.
“Now since Mr. Kayiwa is denying that he is a resource person, it follows that he has NO knowledge, NO relevant skills, NO competence and NO expertise to give a talk, guidance or first-hand info about a topic. He is often NOT well versed with the subject matter.”
HAHAHA! YOU ARE INDEED AN IDIOT. AM NOT A RESOURCE PERSON FOR SPLENDOR BUT A STAFF APOLOGIST AND CORRESPONDENT. STOP FREAKING. YOU ARE MAKING A FOOL OUT OF YOURSELF. YOUR IQ IS LIKE THAT OF A COCKROACH BECAUSE YOU DEVISE TOYS, WHEN THEY ARE REJECTED YOU MAKE COUNTLESS DESPERATE ATTEMPTS TO JUSTIFY THEM-EVEN WHEN EVERYBODY SEES YOU HAVE NO SENSE. YOU HAVE MADE YOUR SELF SILLY. IT IS FREE TO REMAIN SILLY. YES.
“That’s what he wants me to do, okay? You try to give dignity to someone and yet they refuse it.”
AND THEN WHAT? HAHAHAHA! DID I ASK FOR YOUR DIGNITY? AREN’T I BOUND TO REJECT OR ACCEPT IT? PLEASE DON’T IMPOSE YOUR CHILDISH MENTALITY. YOU ARE TRYING TO COVER UP YOUR REJECTION WITH MEANINGLESS EXPLANATIONS. LET ME LAUGH AT YOU….HEHEHEHHEHE! TSK TSK TSK!
“Third, his comment on the New American Bible Revised Edition (NABRE):
FIRST OF ALL, THE NABRE IS NOT THE OFFICIAL CATHOLIC BIBLE BUT THE LATIN VULGATE.
“That’s fine. But you know what? The preface of the NABRE has this:
The first step in the genesis of the New American Bible was taken in 1936 when His Excellency, the Most Reverend Edwin V. O’Hara, D.D., chairman of the Episcopal Committee of the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, invited a group of Catholic Scripture scholars to plan for a revised edition of the Challoner-Rheims New Testament, primarily on the basis of the Vulgate; the plans soon expanded to include the revision of the Old Testament. Therefore, the NABRE was translated from the official version which is the Vulgate.”
AND SO THIS PROVES…WHAT? DOES IT MEAN IT THAT THE NABRE IS THE OFFICIAL BIBLE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH OR A TRANSLATION? DO YOU UNDERSTAND BETTER RODIMUS THE LIAR? WHO IS READING THIS TO SEE AND JUSTLY HATE THESE CHILDISH ARGUMENTS EMPLOYED BY THIS RODIMUS THE LIAR JESTING ON SUCH TRIVIAL AND POINTLESS MATTERS WITH SUCH FALSE REASONING? WHETHER THE NABRE WAS TRANSLATED FROM THE LATIN VULGATE DOESN’T MAKE IT AN OFFICIAL BIBLE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. IT IS NOT. DON’T BE SILLY RODIMUS THE LIAR.
“Lastly, I didn’t notice this about his previous article on the New King James Version. The Admin of the Splendor of the Church blog gave Mr. Kayiwa this praise (in the comments section of his article):”
HAHAHAHA! WERE YOU HURT BY THAT PRAISE? YOU CAN HANG YOURSELF THAT HE GAVE ME THAT PRAISE. IT IS NOT YOUR BUSINESS ANY WAY.SPARE US YOUR TOYS.
“Wow, a good apologist and researcher! Really? Really? I would like to invite my readers to click here. Do you notice anything similar. That’s right folks, it PLAGIARISM.”
HAHAHA! OF COURSE YOU WILL KEEP BLEATING YOUR TAUTOLOGY BECAUSE YOU MUST BE RUNNING CRAZY THAT HE GAVE ME PRAISE. THAT IS WHY I TOLD YOU TO STONEWALL YOURSELF. IN REALITY NOT EVEN ANY CLAIM LIKE THAT, NOT EVEN A VERSE FROM THE BIBLE, NOT A MILE HIGH WILL ABSOLVE THE FACT THAT THAT THE KJV AND OTHER OF YOUR PRECIOUS KJV COUNTERFEITS ARE FAKE. IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY ARE FAKE. SUCH CLAIMS WILL ONLY REINFORCE THE FACT THAT THE BOTH KJVs ARE FAKE. NO MORE NO LESS. THERE IS A WHOLE LOAD OF EVIDENCE PROBING THAT. OF COURSE YOU WILL DESPERATELY KEEP TRYING TO DEFEND YOUR COUNTERFEITS. DO YOU SEE HOW SAD THAT IS?
“Mr. Kayiwa does not provide the links to his “good research”. And the funny thing is when I asserted that he is adapting the style of the King James Onlyist group, he has this reaction:” Taking credit for the works you didn’t do, tsk tsk. Denying that you have nothing to do with KJV onlyism. So who’s the liar now? What a shame!”
HAHAHAHA! NOW THIS IS GOING TO STAB YOU BADLY, RODIMUS THE LIAR, IF YOU ARE NOT STUPID IN YOUR PREVIOUS REPLY YOU HAD CLAIMED SEVERAL THINGS WITHOUT GIVING US LINKS TO THEM. YOU REMEMBER WELL THE IMAGE YOU CLAIMED BELONGS TO A CERTAIN PARISH BUT YOU DID NOT GIVE THE SOURCE. WHERE DID YOU COPY THIS IMAGE RODIMUS? WHERE DID YOU? DID YOU DARE TO GIVE US A LINK? NOW THIS IS A GOOD EXAMPLE OF PLAGIARISM. YOU COPIED AN IMAGE AND DEVIOUSLY CLAIMED IT BELONGS TO A CERTAIN PARISH. WHEN ASKED TO PROVIDE US A LINK, YOU FAILED. LOUD AND UNRELENTING WITH CLAIMS OF PLAGIARISM YET YOU ARE GUILTY OF THE SAME. ARE YOU THAT STUPID? IS THIS THE RESULT OF YOUR FAILURE TO DEFEND THE FACT THAT THE KJVs ARE FAKE?
AGAIN, CLAIMS OF KJV ONLYISM WILL NOT WORK EITHER. YOU WILL REMAIN STUPID AND WHINING WITH SUCH CLAIMS OTHER THAN DEFENDING YOUR COUNTERFEITS FROM BEING FAKE. IN THE END YOU WILL CEMENT THE FACT THAT YOU ARE RODIMUS THE COWARD, THE FOOL AND THE LIAR. YOUR KJVs ARE TRAMPLED UPON, DEMOLISHED, CLOBBERED AND EXPOSED EVEN BY LINKS TO SOURCES YOU CLAIM WERE PLAGIARIZED.IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE. NOW THE PANGS OF DEFEAT IN YOUR DESPERATE EFFORTS TO DEFEND THE KJV ARE TOWERING ON YOU. WHAT WILL YOU DO NOW?
“Now, let’s deal with his arguments on hell and hades.”
HAHA AGAIN ON THAT WHEN IT HAS BEEN PROVED YOU DON’T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO. OKAY RODIMUS THE LIAR, LET US SEE HOW FAR YOU ARE DEFICIENT.
“First of all, this is an absurd attempt to change the topic. It’s a red herring.”
NO NO NO! RODIMUS THE LIAR. IN KISWAHILI “ WAPI”. IS IT YOU WHO GAVE US BOGUS MEANINGS OF HELL AND HADES. LOOK LOOK DEAR READERS WHAT HE SAID PREVIOUSLY;
“Unfortunately for Mr. Kayiwa, the Greek word for hell is hades.”
RODIMUS THE LIAR, ISN’T IT YOU WHO SAID THAT IN YOUR FIRST REPLY? DO YOU DENY THAT? IS THIS THE RESULT OF THE FACT THAT YOU WERE CHALLENGED THAT THE GREEK WORD FOR HADES IS NOT HELL BUT κόλαση? NOW OF COURSE I SEE YOU ARE WHAT YOU SAID-THE REALITY OF THE FACTS -WITH CLAIMS OF RED HERRINGS. THAT IS THE RESULT OF THE FACT THAT YOU ARE RODIMUS THE LIAR, THE COWARD AND IDIOT. SHAME ON YOU.
“In his previous article, he made an exposition on NKJV that it is maliciously mistranslated.”
YES YES, THIS IS A FACT. WHOLE VOLUMES HAVE BEEN WRITTEN BY SCHOLARS INCLUDING PROTESTANT SCHOLARS PROVING THAT THE BOTH THE KJVs ARE A MISTRANSLATION. THE TRANSLATORS OF THE KJV WERE MOVED BY WILL HERESY TO PERVERT AND CHANGE SCRIPTURE TO FIT THEIR OWN AGENDA. THE OLD KJV HAD OVER 30.000 MISTAKES. THE KJV WAS NEVER TRANSLATED FROM THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGES. THE KJV DOES NOT EVEN SPELL OUT WHETHER THE TEXTS THEY USED WERE HEBREW, GREEK OR ARAMAIC. IT DOESN’T SAY WHETHER WHAT WERE USED WERE SCRIPTURES. DOES IT? AND YOU THINK WE CAN FALL FOR SUCH FAKES.
“I’m simply giving a dose of his own medicine by using a Catholic version, the New American Bible (NAB).”
NOW THAT BACKFIRED ON YOU BECAUSE YOU FAILED COMPLETELY.
“I haven’t given any position on the difference between hell and hades. This is Mr. Kayiwa’s way of hiding his embarrassment, by changing topics.”
THEN WHY DID YOU ARGUE ABOUT IT? STOP BEING A LIAR RODIMUS. YOU GAVE YOUR POSITION. YOU CLAIMED THAT THE GREEK WORD FOR HELL IS HADES WHICH IS FALSE. HAHAHAHA! YOU ARE A LIAR AND YOU SHOULD BE EMBARRASSED. THESE ARE JUST DESPERATE ATTEMPTS TO COVER THE FACT THAT YOU WERE PAWNED ON THAT AND ARE MAKING EXCUSES FOR THE SAME. THAT IS THE BEHAVIOR OF IDIOTS LIKE YOU.
“Second we appreciate that he points that there is geena which is also translated as hell in the New Testament. But you know what’s the problem of the picture that shows the Greek word of hell? It’s only an English-Greek dictionary; it’s neither a lexicon nor an interlinear Bible. The point is, his Greek word for hell is not connected to any verse at all since it’s just a dictionary! So no matter what Greek word you see, we still have to check what word did the verse use. ”
HAHAHAHA HAHAHA! THIS IS COMICAL. FIRST YOU APPRECIATE GEENA MEANS HELL IN THE N.T. THEN YOU CLAIM THAT THE SCREENSHOT IS ONLY A DICTIONARY AND NEITHER A LEXION OR INTERLINEAR BIBLE. THEN YOU CAN’T NOT GIVE US WHAT THOSE LEXICONS/INTERLINEARS TESTISY ON THE SAME ISSUE. THEN IN ATTEMPT TO QUASH EVIDENCE, YOU CLAIM THE GREEK WORD I PROVIDED FOR HELL IS NOT CONNECTED TO ANY VERSE IN THE BIBLE SINCE IT’S A DICTIONARY. AGAIN YOU CAN’T PROVIDE THE GREEK WORD AS IT IS IN THE VERSE. CAN’T YOU SEE HOW SAD THAT REALLY IS RODIMUS THE LIAR? MY QUESTION IS, CAN’T THE DICTIONARY GIVE US EVIDENCE?
AGAIN, THE ISSUE AT HAND IS NOT WHETHER THE WORD IN QUESTION APPEARS IN THE VERSE OR DICTIONARY. THE ISSUE AT HAND IS WHAT IS THE GREEK WORD FOR HELL? IS IT HADES OR κόλαση OR ANY OTHER? THIS IS THE ISSUE. DON’T BE SILLY. WITH MY USE OF THE DICTIONARY, I MADE A FIRST GREAT CASE AGAINST YOUR FALSEHOOD.
FURTHER, EVEN IF WE WERE TO LOOK AT HOW IT APPEARS IN THE VERSES, IT WOULD STILL NOT HELP YOUR CASE. HERE ARE EXAMPLES. THE GREEK WORD USED IS γέενναν WHICH MEANS GEEENA
FOR EXAMPLE AT Matthew 18:9
And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you. It is better for you to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes, to be cast into hell fire.
και ει ο οφθαλμος σου σκανδαλιζει σε εξελε αυτον και βαλε απο σου καλον σοι εστιν μονοφθαλμον εις την ζωην εισελθειν η δυο οφθαλμους εχοντα βληθηναι εις την γεενναν του πυρος
HERE IS A LITTLE DRAMATIC EFFECT(CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE)
NOW γεενναν DOESN’T MEAN HADES. SO YOU HAVE NO POINT AT ALL.
“I think I better let his fellow apologist Dave Armstrong refute his absurd argument”
WHO IS DAVE ARMSTRONG? IS HE INFALLIBLE? FIRST THIS BOOMERANGS ON YOU BADLY BECAUSE WHAT IS USED IN THE NABRE IS NOT HADES BUT NETHERWORLD.WHAT YOU QUOTED AGAIN IS NOT DAVE ARMSTRONG’S VIEW BUT A COMMENTARY BY SOME ONE. SECONDARY,EVEN IF IT COULD PROVE SOMETHING, BY EXTENSION IT CAN REFER TO GEHENNA AS I SAID IN ORDER TO BRING A MORE GLORIOUS TRUTH. ISN’T GEHENNA NOT PART OF THE NETHERWORLD? WHERE ARE HERETICS WHO ARE THE POWERS OF THE NETHERWORLD REFERRED TO HERE DAMNED? HADES OR HELL OR GEHENNA? EITHER WAY YOU SEE IT, THE POINT BEING THAT JESUS WAS SPEAKING SYMBOLICALLY. YOU CAN BITE ON IT BUT IT WONT DISPROVE THE CASE THAT THE KJVs ARE FAKE WHILE THE NABs ARE NOT.
“We won’t discuss the difference between hades and geena since that would be off-topic.”
THEN WHY DID YOU ARGUE ABOUT IT IN THE FIRST INSTANCE? THE FACT IS THAT YOU DON’T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HADES AND HELL. NO MORE NO LESS!
REGARDING YOUR CLAIM THAT NETHERWORLD SOUNDS MYTHOLOGICAL TO YOU, IS IT NOW THAT YOU THOUGHT OF PROVIDING EVIDENCE FOR YOUR CLAIM? AGAIN YOU PRESENTED AN IMAGE IN WHICH YOU SAY “It can be associated with mythology.”OKAY,THEN WHY DID YOU MAKE SWEEPING GENERALIZATIONS THAT IT SOUNDS MYTHOLOGICAL TO YOU WITHOUT FIRST FINDING OUT THE EVIDENCE? THAT IS WHY I TOLD YOU THAT YOU ARE STUPID IN PROPER EVIDENCES.LEARN TO GIVE EVIDENCES WHEN IT IS DUE.
“No Mr. Kayiwa, your argument that the NKJV is wrong to use Hades and you cited its verses that have Hades. Let’s bring that statement which you copied from others:”
STILL THIS WOULD NOT ABSOLVE THE FACT THAT THE KJVs ARE FALSE. OFCOURSE YOU WILL KEEP TRYING. WHERE DID I SAY THAT THE NKJV IS WRONG TO USE HADES? DID I SAY THAT? DO YOU UNDERSTAND BASIC STATEMENTS? I TOLD YOU THAT THE NKJV DIFFER WITHOUT EVEN HIGHLIGHTING THIS.THE WHOLE ISSUE IS THAT THE 2 KJVs ARE INCOSISTENT AMONG THEMSELVES. IS SUCH A SCENARIO IN THE NABs?
“This time I underlined the last two verses which has Hades in the NKJV. This means you find it wrong that the NKJV did this. But, hello, the NAB also has Hades on those two verses. That means you should conclude that the NAB is wrong as well. Let’s ask a few questions and see if Mr. Kayiwa can give a straight yes or no answer.”
ALL THIS IS REPETITION. LET US SEE REVELATION 6:8
“I looked, and behold, an ashen horse; and he who sat on it had the name Death; and Hades was following with him. Authority was given to them over a fourth of the earth, to kill with sword and with famine and with pestilence and by the wild beasts of the earth.”
BUT IF WE CONTINUE READING, WE SHALL FIND THAT THIS IS NOT THE CASE
REVELATION 20:14
“And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead which were in them; and they were judged, every one of them according to their deeds. 14Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire.”
AT REVELATION 6:8, IT IS NOT HELL(GEHENA) IN VIEW. THIS IS WHERE THE OLD KJV MAKES A MISTAKE. VERSE 14 GIVES US A BETTER VIEW. WE HAVE DEATH AND HADES THROWN INTO THE LAKE OF FIRE. WHAT IS THE LAKE OF FIRE? IS IT HADES OR GEHENA? IT IS GEHENNA-WHICH IS NOT HADES. THE GREEK TEXT DOES NOT USE γεενναν BUT λίμνην τοῦ πυρός “OR LAKE OF FIRE” WHICH IS ANOTHER NAME FOR GEHENNA IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. HADES AND GEHENNA ARE NOT THE SAME THING ALTHOUGH SOME REFER TO HELL AS HADES. HADES IS AN ABODE OF THE DEAD WHILE GEHENNA IS A PLACE OF THE DAMNED.TO UNDERSTAND THIS, THIS QUESTION SHOULD BE POSED: HOW CAN REVELATION 20:11-15 SAY THAT THE SOULS IN HADES WILL BE CALLED FORTH, REUNITED WITH THEIR BODIES, AND THEN CAST INTO THE LAKE OF FIRE(GEHENNA) IF WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT HADES IS ETERNAL HELL?
THUS, EVEN IF THE NABRE HAS HADES HERE, IT IS USED PROPERLY WHILE THE 2 KJVs DIFFER EVEN WITHOUT EXPLANATIONS IN FOOTNOTES. WHY?THE NABRE USES THE ACTUAL WORDS HERE, HADES WHERE IT IS DUE AND LEAVES OTHERS WORDS AS THEY ARE WHILE THE 2 KJVs ARE NOT SAYING THE SAME THING. THE OLDER KJV HAS HELL HERE WHILE THE NKJV HAS HADES. THIS MEANS THE OLDER(WHICH THE BAPTISTS WORSHIP) IS INCORRECT. HADES IS AN ABODE OF THE DEAD BUT IT IS NOT ETERNAL HELL. THE LOST SOULS IN HADES (ABODE OF THE DEAD) WILL BE CALLED FORTH, BUT THOSE IN GEHENNA WILL REMAIN THEIR FOREVER. THEY ARE DAMNED. THIS WOULD PROVE THE CATHOLIC DOCTRINE OF PURGATORY IF DELVED DEEPER INTO
AND THEN YOU ASK;
“Is the NKJV wrong to translate to Hades in Revelations 6:8 and 20:13,14?”
THE ISSUE IS THE 2 KJVs DON’T SAY THE SAME THING. WHICH IS RIGHT AMONG THE 2? YOU ARE NOT ANSWERING THIS.
“Is the NAB wrong to translate to Hades in Revelations 6:8 and 20:13,14?”
THE NABs USE HADES PROPERLY HERE. THE NABs USE THE ACTUAL WORDS UNLIKE THE KJVs. THIS HAS BEEN THE ISSUE I HAVE BEEN TELLING YOU SINCE THE BEGINNING.
“Although, I sincerely doubt that Mr. Kayiwa will give us straight answers. Oh now the NABRE is justified by clearing it in footnotes. Okay so, the NABRE can use the words Mr. Kayiwa dislikes as long as it writes in footnotes. But when the NKJV does this we will see comments like:”
IT REINFORCES MY POINT FURTHER. APART FROM USING TERMS PROPER, THE NABs GO AHEAD TO GIVE DIFFERENCES IN TRANSLATIONS. ARE THE KJVs HIGHLIGHTING THESE DIFFERENCES IN FOOTNOTES? THIS IS THE SAME ISSUE WITH YOUR OTHER ARGUMENTS YOU RAISE. YOU KEEP BLEATING YOUR TAUTOLOGIES.WHY DOESN’T THE KJVs EXPLAINS DIFFERENCES IN TRANSLATIONS IN FOOTNOTES LIKE THE NABRE DOES? ISN’T THAT NEGLIGENCE? THE NABs HAVE EXPLANATIONS ON ALL THESE UNLIKE THE KJVs. THAT IS NEGLIGENCE. STILL EVEN IF YOU BITE ON THIS, IT WOULD NOT ABSOLVE THE FACT THAT THE KJVs ARE FALSE AND COUNTERFEITS. THERE IS A WHOLE LOAD OF EVIDENCE ON THAT.
“And finally, he questions the Triquetra symbol being present in a Catholic parish:”
NO YOU ARE LYING. I QUESTIONED THE USE OF THE SYMBOL ON THE NKJV IN WHICH YOU REALIZED THAT IT’S A SATANIC AND OCCULT SYMBOL BUT SOME CHRISTIANS USE IT TO REPRESENT THE TRINITY THOUGH YOU DID NOT MENTION WHICH CHRISTIANS. FURTHER, YOU TOLD US THAT IT IS USED BY A CATHOLIC PARISH WHICH YOU DIDN’T INDICATE. IN ALL LIKELIHOOD YOU WERE LYING THROUGH YOUR TEETH. IT ALSO PROVES YOUR DOUBLE STANDARDS BECAUSE YOU APPROVE OF IT TO BE USED ON THE KJV WHILE YOU ARE ARGUE AGAINST SACRED IMAGES OF CATHOLICS. THAT MAKES YOU A DOUBLE MINDED OCCULTIST.
“Not convinced? Just google triquetra catholic church and check the links provided. Click here and you will see that the symbol is for sale at a Catholic shop.’
CONVINCED OF WHAT? YOU LIES AND HARLOTRY? HAHAHAHAHA! HEHEHEHEHE! I THOUGHT THAT YOU WOULD GIVE US A LINK TO THE PARISH SITE WHERE THIS SYMBOL IS USED AS YOU CLAIMED. NOW YOU ARE DIRECTING PEOPLE TO GOOGLE FOR THEMSELVES. I THOUGHT YOU HAD PROPER EVIDENCE AT HAND. DO YOU SEE HOW STUPID YOU ARE? MUCH MORE YOUR STUPIDITY IS PROVED WHEN THE SITE YOU SUGGEST DOESN’T LEAD TO A CATHOLIC PARISH BUT A STORE. HERE IS THE LINK TO THE STORE YOU PRESENTED( http://www.catholicfaithstore.com/Store/Products/SKU/892e/Triquetra-Celtic-Knot-Earrings.html#.VIvGczHF91Y)
TO FURTHER SOLIDIFY THE FACT THAT YOU ARE A STUPID, THE IMAGE SHOWN IN THE LINK IS NOT WHAT YOU PRESENTED BUT ONE OF JEWELRY (EAR RINGS)! HAHAHAHA! ARE YOU THAT STUPID? HAHAHAHA HERE IS THE DIFFERENCE.
SEE, THE PICTURES ARE NOT THE SAME!! HAHAHAHA! YOU CAN’T PROVIDE EVIDENCE RODIMUS THE LIAR. YOU LIED THROUGH YOUR TEETH. SHAME ON YOU.
“I’m sure this will not be the last that we shall see Mr. Kayiwa. But don’t worry, we’ll be ready for his ad hominems,,, oops, I mean his arguments.”
YEAH IT WON’T BE THE LAST. AS LONG AS YOU COME IN OUR COMPOUND TO ATTACK US, WE SHALL ANSWER WITH GREATER FORCE. IT IS MY ROLE AS AN APOLOGIST TO REFUTE HERETICS LIKE YOU. THIS WHOLE BLOG EXISISTS FOR HERETICS LIKE YOU-PEOPLE WHO FOLLOW THE VOICE OF SATAN LIKE YOU. YOU WILL NOT FIND ME SPENDING TIME IN YOUR STUPID AND LOW QUALITY BLOGS BECAUSE I DON’T HAVE TIME FORF THEM. BUT IF YOU COME HERE, THEN EXPECT FIRE. WE SHALL ANSWER YOU BLUNTLY AND STRONGLY. MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT THAT.