Gerry Soliman alias Rodimus the liar-the hiding coward
DO YOU REMEMBER RODIMUS THE DECEIVER? DO YOU REMEMBER THAT CHAP WHO USED TO BEHAVE LIKE A MASKED SERPENT RODIMUS THE COWARD? I MEAN THAT BORN AGAIN PASTOR(GERALD) WHO LONG AGO WAS BEHAVING LIKE THE DEMONS, HIDING HIS IDENTITY OF A ROBOT WHILE ALL THE MORE ATTACKING US WITH IMPUNITY UNTIL HE WAS BUSTED AND DESTROYED? DO YOU REMEMBER THAT CHAP WHO MADE A PUBLIC APOLOGY AFTER HIS ERRORS WERE EXPOSED FOR EVERYONE TO SEE? THIS FAKE ROBOT WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS BACK ON SPLENDOR AFTER HIS PRECIOUS,COUNTERFEIT AND DECEITFUL KJV BIBLE-WHICH HE WORSHIPS IN HIS STATEMENT OF FAITH-WAS EXPOSED.
AS NORMAL OF ALL AMATEUR APOLOGISTS(LIKE ATTY LLASOS RIGHTLY CALLED HIM), HIS METHOD IS ONE OF ARGUMENTATION WITHOUT PROPER EVIDENCES/PROOFS AND EMPLOYMENT OF SILLY AND CHILD LIKE ARGUMENTS WHILE ALL THE MORE IMPOSING HIS STUPIDITY ON OTHERS. RODIMUS THE LIAR IS IGNORANT INDEED AND DEFICIENT IN BASIC GREEK.HE IS ALSO NOT HELPED BY HIS POOR ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND LOW QUALITY RESEARCH WHICH IS CLEARLY MANIFEST IN HIS STUPID AND HIDDEN “KA”BLOG. LET ME GET TO REFUTING HIS SELF IMPOSED STUPIDITY AND WILLFUL COWARDLINESS; HE REPLIED IN HIS LOW QUALITY BLOG TO MY ARTICLE IN WHICH I COMPARED THE OLD KJV TO THE NKJV AND EXPOSED THE LUKEWARMNESS IN THESE DECEITFUL KJV BOOKS, FIRST COMMISSIONED BY A HOMOSEXUAL KING JAMES-AN EVIL KING COMMISSIONING A BIBLE!!!! THEY DO NOT DESERVE TO BE CALLED “HOLY BIBLE”. IT IS AN INSULT AGAINST THE SACRED SCRIPTURES.
“Mr. Aloysius Kayiwa, a resource person of the Splendor of Church blog,”
WHO IS THE DEVIL WHO TOLD YOU THAT AM A RESOURCE PERSON OF SPLENDOR BLOG? WHERE DID YOU STUDY FROM? ARE YOU SO DULL TO THINK THAT AN APOLOGIST IS A RESOURCE PERSON? DO YOU KNOW WHAT ‘APOLOGETICS OR AN APOLOGIST” MEAN? DEAR RODIMUS THE LIAR, AM A SPLENDOR CORRESPONDENT FOR AFRICA AND STAFF APOLOGIST. UNDERSTAND BASIC STATEMENTS. DON’T TRY TO TELL PEOPLE WHAT AM NOT.
“wrote a very interesting article exposing the alleged errors, omissions, and the occult by comparing the King James Version (KJV) against the New King James Version (NKJV).“
IT IS GOOD YOU REALIZE IHOW INTERESTING IT IS. SO WHY DID YOU AGAIN DISCREDIT IT! ARE YOU THAT DENSE?
“It also attempts to discredit Protestant scholars when Mr. Kayiwa said at the near end of the article:”
SO WHAT? YEAH AND I RIGHTFULLY DID SO BECAUSE PROTESTANT SCHOLARS ARE KNOWN HERETICS. ISN’T IT OUR ROLE AS APOLOGISTS TO DESTROY HERETICS? WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF APOLOGETICS? IF THEY PRODUCED CORRUPTED VERSIONS OF THE BIBLE AT THE HELM OF A DECEITFUL AND EVIL KING, DON’T THEY DESERVE TO BE DISCREDITED? YOU ARE DECEITFUL AS WELL BECAUSE YOU ARE A SUPPORTER OF THESE DECEITFUL SCHOLARS WHO CORRUPTED THE BIBLE WITH THEIR LIES AND OMISSIONS.
“I read the entire article and I must say that it is the funniest article I read so far.”
HELLO! YET YOU HAD CLAIMED IT IS INTERESTING AND NOW IT IS FUNNY. CAN’T YOU SEE HOW THIS AMBIGUITY IS LOWERING YOUR ATTEMPTS TO CHALLENGE THE ARTICLE?
“He resorts to the tactics of KJV onlyism in discrediting modern Bible versions with a twist of Romanism tactics.”
HAHAHA! SO WHAT? RODIMUS THE LIAR, DON’T IMPOSE ON ME YOUR EVIL “KJV ONLYISM”. YOU’VE GOT TO BE KIDDING. YOU ARE TRYING TO BE FUNNY BUT ALSO ALL THE MORE PATHETIC. WELL, EVEN IF YOU CLAIM ALL THAT, NO ONE WILL TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY. YOU STILL REMAIN RODIMUS THE LIAR! RODIMUS THE COWARD! RODIMUS THE DECEIVER! WE KNOW.
“It is also classic case of not removing the dirt from your own eye before removing the dirt from others.I never seen such hypocrisy just to discredit Protestantism.”
NOW THIS MAKES YOU A GOOD HYPOCRITE. BECAUSE WE KNOW YOUR ANTI-CATHOLIC MENTALITY IS WELL DOCUMENTED AND GROUNDED. I HAVE RECORDS OF THAT.SO WHY DON’T YOU REMOVE YOUR DIRT FIRST BEFORE DOING SO TO OTHERS? YOU ATTACK OTHERS WITH IMPUNITY YET YOU HAVE A DIRTY BACK FILLED WITH FALSEHOOD. RODIMUS THE LIAR, YOU ARE KNOWN CERTIFIED AND AUDITED COWARD,LIAR AND IDIOT.WHAT IS PROTESTANTISM ANYWAY? WHAT ARE YOU STILL PROTESTING? WOULD GOD USE PROTESTERS? WELL, THE KNIVES YOU THROW AT US WILL BE THROWN BACK IN EQUAL MEASURE. IF YOU CONTINUE ATTACKING CATHOLICISM WITH IMPUNITY, ALSO NOTE THAT WE SHALL ANSWER WITH BOMBS.MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT THAT. SO OUR ROLE AS APOLOGISTS IS TO DESTROY HERESIES WHICH INCLUDE HERETICAL BIBLE TRANSLATIONS LIKE YOUR OWN KJV COMMISSIONED BY A HOMOSEXUAL KING.
“Well enough about the general comments, let’s deal with the article. We won’t go through each verse he brought up, we’ll only deal with his argument and show only one sample for each.”
HAHAHA! I THOUGHT YOU ARE CONFIDENT ENOUGH TO CHALLENGE THE WHOLE ARTICLE. PRETTY GOOD FOR AN AMATEUR APOLOGIST LIKE YOU WHO CAN ONLY SLING WHAT YOU THINK YOU CAN CHALLENGE WHILE LEAVING OUT WHAT YOU CAN NOT. THAT IS WHY YOU ARE LOW QUALITY. YOU LACK CONFIDENCE, WHICH IS ONE OF THE QUALITIES NEEDED BY APOLOGISTS. THE FACT IS YOU CAN NOT CHALLENGE THE WHOLE ARTICLE PIECE BY PIECE, LINE BY LINE, SENTENCE BY SENTENCE. THAT IS ONE OF THE HALLMARKS OF AMATEUR APOLOGISTS AND SOLID PROOF OF YOUR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.
“The funny thing about this, just like I said, is taking a KJV onlyist form of argumentation.”
LOL! WHY WOULD I USE SUCH TACTICS? DO I BELIEVE THE KJV?WHERE DID I USE THAT RODIMUS THE LIAR? PLEASE STOP IMPOSING ON ME YOUR MENTALITY. WE KNOW THAT THE KJV IS FALSE AND CORRUPTED. KING JAMES HAD NO AUTHORITY TO COMPOSE A BIBLE. WORSE, HE WAS A HOMOSEXUAL AND A BLUNDERING KING. SO STOP HALLUCINATING THAT I WOULD EMPLOY YOUR STUPID MENTALITY. SUCH MENTALITY IS LOW QUALITY-ONLY FOR COWARDS LIKE YOU.
“It’s true that no two versions are the same. But what will make it contradictory is when the real meaning becomes different between two or more versions.”
AND EXACTLY THAT APPLIES TO YOUR COUNTERFEIT KJV AND THE NKJV. SOME OF THE VERSES ARE TOTAL OPPOSITES, OTHERS ARE NOT SAYING THE SAME THING AS I PROVED IN MY ARTICLE. WHAT IS THAT?
“From hereon, Mr. Kayiwa tells what’s wrong with the NKJV without looking at Catholic versions first to see if it does not have the same wrongs.”
DEAR RODIMUS THE LIAR, AM NOT THE ONLY ONE SPELLING OUT WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE NKJV. VARIOUS OTHER SCHOLARS INCLUDING PROTESTANT SCHOLARS HAVE WROTE WHOLE VOLUMES CONDEMNING THE KJV. DO A SIMPLE SEARCH IN THE INTERNET. AS REGARDS THE CATHOLIC BIBLES, STOP HALLUCINATING THAT I DIDN’T LOOK AT CATHOLIC VERSIONS. I DID AND I KNOW WHAT I WAS WRITING. WELL IT IS GOOD FOR YOU THAT YOU LOOKED AT CATHOLIC VERSIONS AND DESPERATELY TRIED TO POINT OUT THE IRONY BUT YOUR LOW QUALITY INTELLIGENCE BETRAYED YOU AS I WILL PROVE LATER.
“Unfortunately for Mr. Kayiwa, the Greek word for hell is hades.”
LIAR LIAR LIAR! IT IS CLEAR YOU HAVE NOT BROKEN FROM YOUR HABIT OF LYING. IS THIS THE RESULT OF YOUR DEFICIENT AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE? CONTRARY TO WHAT YOU SAY, THE GREEK WORD FOR HELL IS κόλαση. IN GREEK HADES IS WRITTEN AS “Άδη” AND DOESN’T TRANSLATE AS HELL. THE AUTOMATIC TRANSLATION FOR κόλαση IN THE GREEK-ENGLISH DICTIONARY is HELL. LOOK HERE;
FURTHER, STRONG’S CONCORDANCES SHOWS THAT HELL REFERS TO GEENNA OR GEHENNA IN GREEK(http://biblehub.com/greek/1067.htm).ALTHOUGH HADES IS TRANSLATED AS HELL BY SOME,HADES IS NOT HELL. HADES IS THE GREEK TRANSLATION OF SHEOL. JESUS USED GEENNA/ GEHENNA WHICH IS SYMBOLIC OF HELL FIRE. IT IS JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF WHO USES THE WORD GEHENNA 11 OUT OF THE 12 TIMES THAT GEHENNA APPEARS IN THE BIBLE FOR EXAMPLE READ MATHEW 18:19
Matthew 18:9
And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you. It is better for you to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes, to be cast into hell (gehenna) fire.
WHEN JESUS USED THE WORD GEHENNA, HE DOESN’T MEAN HADES.THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE 2 WORDS WHICH RODIMUS THE LIAR DOESN’T UNDERSTAND. GEHENNA TAKES ITS NAME FROM A VALLEY LOCATED IN JERUSALEM CALLED THE VALLEY OF HINNOM. DURING JESUS’S TIME ON EARTH, THIS VALLEY WAS USED AS THE CITY DUMP. A FIRE WAS CONSTANTLY KEPT ALIGHT THERE TO BURN UP AND CONSUME ALL OF THE CITY’S UNWANTED RUBBISH. HADES, WHICH IS THE GREEK TRANSLATION OF THE HEBREW SHEOL, IS AN ABODE OF THE DEAD. GEHENNA, ON THE OTHER HAND, IS THE DESTINATION OF THE DAMNED. THUS WHEN RODIMUS THE COWARD SAYS HELL EQUATES TO HADES, HE IS ACTUALLY MEANING AN ABODE OF THE DEAD AND NOT A PLACE FOR THE DAMNED. THE KJV ALSO ATTEMPTS TO DOWN PLAY THE REALITY OF HELL BY EMPLOYING SUCH ABOMINABLE TACTICS.
“Now let’s expose his hypocrisy by bringing in a Roman Catholic version, the New American Bible (NAB).”
HAHA! FIRST OF ALL, THE NABRE IS NOT THE OFFICIAL CATHOLIC BIBLE BUT THE LATIN VULGATE. I WONDER WHY YOU DIDN’T BRING IN THE LV? IT IS OKAY LET US SEE. IN REALITY, RODIMUS THE LIAR YOU WILL NOT SUCCEED. YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF THAT AS HISTORY TESTIFIES. LET US SEE YOUR TRY AND MAKE LOGICAL REFUTATIONS.
I DON’T INTEND TO CLAIM THAT NETHERWORLD AUTOMATICALLY MEANS HELL. BUT IT ALSO HAS REFERENCE TO “ABBADON” IN HEBREW WHICH MEANS A PLACE OF DESTRUCTION.BY EXTENSION, IT CAN MEAN AN UNDERWORLD ABODE OF LOST SOULS, OR GEHENNA. WHEN IN VIEW OF THE CONTEXT OF THE VERSE AT MATTHEW 16:18, THE IMPLICATION IS THAT JESUS REFERRED TO HELL(OR GEHENNA) WHERE HERETICS AND SATAN THAT WONT PREVAIL AGAINST THE CHURCH ARE DAMNED. IT IS PRECISELY THE REASON WHY THE NABRE DOESN’T USE HADES KNOWING THAT HADES IS NOT GEHENNA-THE PLACE OF HERETICS AND SATAN’S MINIONS BUT AN ABODE OF THE DEAD. THE GATES OF HELL/NETHERWORLD SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST THE CHURCH IS ABOUT HERESIES AND HERETICS . IN FACT , FOR EXAMPLE ORIGEN EXPLAINS WHY THE HERESIES ARE CALLED GATES OF HELL , IT`S BECAUSE THROUGH THEM AND BECAUSE OF THEM , PEOPLE END UP IN HELL . SO OUR LORD JESUS WAS TELLING PETER , THAT THE HERETICS AND HERESIES WILL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST THE CHURCH . AND TO SAY HERESIES AND HERETICS IS TO SAY THE ATTACKS OF THE EVIL ONE . WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS AN OFT-REPEATED PROMISE OF THE VICTORY OF CHRIST’S CHURCH OVER THE FORCES OF EVIL. THE NABRE NOTES THAT CLEARLY IN FOOTNOTES THERE(AND ALSO GIVES A SYNONYM OF THE TERM)
AGAIN EVEN THOUGH THE NABRE USES “NETHERWORLD” PERCEIVED DEFICIENCIES IN TRANSLATION, AS WELL AS INTRODUCTIONS AND FOOTNOTING ARE WELL HIGHLIGHTED AND OFTEN NOTED BY THE NABRE UNLIKE THE KJV/NJKV-WHICH LUMP HELL AND HADES AS SIMILAR WITHOUT HIGHLIGHTING KNOWN DEFICIENCIES. THERE IS NO HYPOCRISY HERE, IT’S JUST YOU WANT TO BE LED BY SILLY ARGUMENTS.
“Oooh… netherworld. Sounds “mythological” to me.”
YOU ONLY PROVE TO US THAT YOU ARE VERY STUPID. IS NETHERWORLD ASSOCIATED WITH MYTHOLOGY? PROVE THAT TO US. IT SOUNDS MYTHOLOGICAL TO YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE DENSE AND A CERTIFIED IDIOT. WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT “NETHERWORLD” IS MYTHOLOGICAL? HE HE HE, YOU ARE STUPID IN PROPER EVIDENCES.
“So why doesn’t he first criticize the NAB before the NKJV?”
CRITICIZE IT FOR WHAT? HAS IT CHANGED ANY DOCTRINE? I WOULD CRITICIZE IT FOR SURE IF I OBSERVE ERRORS IN IT BUT I OBSERVE THE NABRE USES NETHERWORLD(WHICH IS ACTUALLY OKAY THERE) WHILE IT ALSO NOTES DEFICIENCIES IN TRANSLATIONS WHEREAS THE NKJV DECEPTIVELY REPLACES HELL WITH HADES-WITHOUT EXPOUNDING ON DEFICIENCY IN TRANSLATIONS. AND EVEN THOUGH THE NABRE USES “NETHERWORLD”, THIS HAS NOT AFFECTED CATHOLIC DOCTRINE ON HELL WHICH THE NKJV IS GUILTY OF(THE INTENTION OF NKJV IS TO SEND A MESSAGE THAT THERE IS NO REALITY OF HELL WHERE THE DAMNED SUFFER). OF COURSE WE DON’T NEED TO CHANGE THE DOCTRINE. YOU CAN HAVE THE NAME OF THE DOCTRINE BE HELL AND STILL ACKNOWLEDGE AND PROPERLY TRANSLATE THE BIBLE TO REFLECT WHAT JESUS ACTUALLY SAID.THIS THE NABRE DOES WHILE THE NKJV FAILS. WE KNOW WELL THAT THE TRANSLATORS OF THE KJV WERE MOVED BY WILL HERESY TO PERVERT AND CHANGE SCRIPTURE TO FIT THEIR OWN AGENDA. NO MORE, NO LESS!
“I guess Catholic scholars are allowed to make us of the word hades and still be in their right mind.”
THIS IS WHINING. THE CATHOLIC SCHOLARS DO SO,USING TERMS THAT ARE DUE WHILE THE THE 2 KJVs DIFFER! SO WHICH IS RIGHT BETWEEN THE 2 KJVs? OF COURSE THIS WILL US TO THE CONCLUSION THAT ONE OF THE KJVs IS FALSE OR RIGHT. FACT IS BOTH ARE COUNTERFEITS.
“Oh just in case that he will argue that Hell and Hades has no difference in the NAB, well that’s so absurd and it sidetracked from his original argument that using Hades is wrong.”
HELLO! I HAVE ALREADY PROVED THAT HELL AND HADES ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS. THE NABRE CLEARLY SHOWS THIS. HADES IS THE ABODE OF THE DEAD AND HELL IS A PLACE OF THE DAMNED(THE POOL OF FIRE). IT CANT GET ANY BETTER THAN THAT. WHERE DID I ARGUE THAT HADES IS WRONG? I SAID THAT THE 2 KJVs DIFFER. SO WHICH IS RIGHT AMONG THE 2? DO THE NABs DIFFER ON SUCH ISSUES LIKE THESE?
“Let’s see how the NAB translates Acts 3:13: Oooh… servant. Little does Mr. Kayiwa know that the Greek word used there is pais (orpaida), which can be translated as son or servant (see Matthew 8:8).”
SO WHAT? STILL THE NABRE IS TELLING ME WHY THIS IS SO IN THE FOOTNOTES UNLIKE THE KJVs. THIS IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN TELLING YOU THAT DIFFERENCES IN TRANSLATIONS ARE NOTED IN THE NABRE WHILE THE KJVs ARE LUKEWARM IN THAT. OFCOURSE I HAD TO WONDER WHY THEY DIFFER HERE WITHOUT EXPLANATIONS? OF COURSE SERVANT CAN ALSO REFER TO SON OR CHILD, BUT ARE THE KJVs HIGHLIGHTING THESE IN FOOTNOTES? THIS IS THE SAME ISSUE WITH YOUR OTHER ARGUMENTS THAT FOLLOW. WHY DOESN’T THE KJVs EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES IN TRANSLATIONS IN FOOTNOTES LIKE THE NABRE DOES? ISN’T THAT NEGLIGENCE?
“Well, we can go on with the other verses he sighted but I think the point is clear.”
YOU CAN GO ON. I FEAR NOTHING FROM COWARDS LIKE YOU. GO ON RODIMUS! I HAVE NOT SEEN WHERE YOU HAVE DEFENDED THE KJVs FROM BEING ERRONEOUS. STILL THE NEGLIGENCE OF THE KJVs IS CLEAR. WHY DON’T YOU GO ON WITH OTHER VERSES? DO YOU DENY THAT THE KJVs ARE NOT ERRONEOUS? OR I GIVE YOU MORE ERRORS?
“Mr. Kayiwa shows his bigotry against Protestants. It’s not okay for him that the NKJV to show the words he dislikes but he doesn’t seem to criticize the NAB for including the same words he dislikes.”
HAHAHAHA! MR. RODIMUS THE LIAR, YOU ARE A KNOWN ANTI-CATHOLIC FILLED WITH ANTI-CATHOLIC BIGOTRY WHICH IS EVIDENT IN YOUR LOW QUALITY BLOG. WHO TOLD YOU THAT I DISLIKE THE WORDS SHOWED BY THE NKJV? WHERE AS THE NABRE USES SUCH WORDS, DIFFERENCES IN TRANSLATIONS ARE WELL HIGHLIGHTED BY THE NABRE IN THE FOOTNOTES, SOMETHING THE 2 KJVs ARE NOT DOING. HOW LONG WILL I KEEP REPEATING THIS? THE ORIGINAL 1611 KING JAMES VENISON HAD OVER 30,000 MISTAKES MOST OF WHICH HAVE BEEN CORRECTED OF THESE CHANGES AND BAD TRANSLATIONS. AM GOING TO REVEAL SOME OF THESE ERRORS IN MY NEXT BLOG. FURTHER, THE ORIGINAL 1611 KING JAMES VERSION CONTAINED THE DEUTERO-CANONICAL BOOKS. IT WAS NOT UNTIL THE 1629 REVISION THAT THEY WERE REMOVED? WHY??
WHICHEVER OBSERVATION YOU WISH TO BELIEVE FORCES US TO DOUBT THE AUTHENTICITY AND ACCURACY OF THIS DECEITFUL BOOK CALLED THE KJV. IT ALSO FORCES US TO CLASSIFY THE KING JAMES VERSION OF THE BIBLE HAS NOTHING MORE THAN A MISTRANSLATED.
“Just in case that Mr. Kayiwa argues that there is no official Catholic version of the Bible, that hardly answers the issue.”
HAHAHA! TO REMIND THIS COWARD, THE OFFICIAL BIBLE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE LATIN VULGATE. I WISH YOU DARED TO CONTRAST IT AGAINST YOUR COUNTERFEIT KJV. IT’S MOST ACCURATE BIBLE TRANSLATED FROM THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGES AND IS RECOGNIZED BY PROTESTANT SCHOLARS AS BEING THE TRUE TRANSLATION. THE KJV WAS NEVER TRANSLATED FROM THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGES. THE KJV DOES NOT EVEN SPELL OUT WHETHER THE TEXTS THEY USED WERE HEBREW, GREEK OR ARAMAIC. IT DOESN’T SAY WHETHER WHAT WERE USED WERE SCRIPTURES. DOES IT? AND YOU THINK WE CAN BELIEVE SUCH COUNTERFEIT?
“Mr. Kayiwa cites the NKJV which allegedly include wrong translation of words, so we went to their backyard and get the NAB to see if it also withstand the test Mr. Kayiwa did to the NKJV (and the NAB appears to fail by Mr. Kayiwa’s standard). Would he drop the NAB like a hot potato?”
LOL! THESE ARE OLD WIVES TALES TO ME. ALL THAT CRAP HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. THE KJVs FAILS THE TEST BY MANY COUNTS. APART FROM FAILING TO REVEAL DIFFERENCES IN TRANSLATIONS, BOOKS WERE REMOVED FROM THE BIBLE, THE TEXTS THEY USED WERE NOT ORIGINAL TEXTS USED BY CHRIST AND APOSTLES. THEY INSTEAD CHOOSE TO USE 10TH CENTURY “MISHNAIC HEBREW TEXTS INSTEAD OF THE 5TH CENTURY GREEK TEXT ? THIS EXPLAINS WHY IN MANY PLACES OF THE ORIGINAL KING JAMES VERSION NEW TESTAMENT QUOTES DO NOT MATCH UP WITH THE OLD TESTAMENT QUOTES, LEADING TO MUCH CONFUSION AND PROBLEMS. THE CLAIM THAT THE KJV WAS TRANSLATED FROM ORIGINAL TEXTS IS THE FIRST OF MANY LIES REGARDING THIS DECEITFUL BOOK.
RODIMUS THE COWARD, I WOULD NOT DROP THE NABRE BECAUSE THERE ARE NO CHANGES IN DOCTRINE IN THAT BIBLE DESPITE THE USE OF THOSE WORDS WHILE THE KJV FAILS AT THIS SINCE DOCTRINE IS CHANGED. STILL THE NABRE DID NOT REMOVE BOOKS LIKE THE KJVs DID. THAT DECEITFUL BOOK WAS WRITTEN SOLELY FOR THE CoE(CHURCH OF ENGLAND-ANGLICAN) BY THE EVIL KING JAMES AND OMISSIONS WERE MADE TO SUIT THEIR HERESIES. THE DEUTERO CANONICAL BOOKS WERE PART OF EVERY CHRISTIAN BIBLE CANON UP UNTIL THE 16TH CENTURY.WHY WERE THEY REMOVED IN THE NKJV?AGAIN EXPLANATIONS IN NABRE ARE MADE ON DIFFERENCES IN TRANSLATIONS WHICH THE NKJV DOES NOT DO. I DON’T NEED TO REPEAT THIS MORE. WE KNOW BETTER ABOUT THE KJVs. THEY ARE EBOLA! THEY NEED TO BE ELIMINATED AND ISOLATED. HAHAHA
“Moving on, let’s now tackle Mr. Kayiwa’s allegation that the NKJV is has a “questionable” symbol. He posted this in his article:”
AND INDEED IT IS A QUESTIONABLE SYMBOL. REGARDING THIS PICTURE WHICH YOU PRESENTED, PLEASE TELL US WHICH PARISH HAS THIS? COME ON??
PLEASE RODIMUS THE LIAR, TELL US WHICH PARISH HAS THIS SYMBOL? YOU ARE SO LUKEWARM IN GIVING PROPER EVIDENCES. TELL US WHICH PARISH AND PLEASE GIVE US A LINK TO THIS IMAGE? AGAIN YOU INSISTED THAT “IT IS A SATANIC SYMBOL BUT SOME CHRISTIANS USE IT TO REPRESENT THE TRINITY”. WHICH CHRISTIANS? AGAIN THIS BACKFIRES ON YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE AGAINST IMAGES,ALWAYS ATTACKING CATHOLIC SACRED IMAGES. IS IT OKAY THAT THIS “PAGAN SYMBOL” -AS YOU HAVE CALLED IT- SHOULD BE ON YOUR PRECIOUS COUNTERFEIT-THE KJV? THIS COULD PROVE YOU ARE THE GREATEST HYPOCRITE. YOU ARE AGAINST IMAGES BUT YOU ARE NOT AGAINST THE SYMBOL ON THE KJV YET YOU CALL IT PAGAN! SHAME ON YOU!