The Dome designed by Michelangelo atop the Tomb of St. Peter in Rome.
Me: How about your church/sect? The God of the Bible would have said something about it. But the Bible says nothing. Therefore your church/sect is of no real significance.
HA HA HA THE MORE YOU HAVE PROVEN TO US THAT YOU ARE AN IDOT MR. JESSICA SANCHEZ. HA HA HA… SO YOU ARE NOT PUSHING FOR THE JERUSALEM TOMB. HA HA HA… IT MEANS YOU DO NO BELIEVE THAT IT IS THE REAL TOMB. HA HA HA…
[all I'm saying is there is another claim for Peter's tomb.]
HA HA HA… IDIOT. WHY DO YOU HAVE TO SAY THAT? IS THE CLAIM BEING DENIED? WHAT WE ARE SAYING IS THAT IT IS A NEWLY INVENTED CLAIM AND THAT IT IS DISMISSED BY THE SCHOLARS FOR FAILING TO CONVINCE THEM OF ITS CLAIM. HA HA HA….
TO DENY A WELL ESTABLISHED FACT ACCEPTED BY MILLIONS OF PEOPLE FROM GENERATIONS TO GENERATIONS FOR ALMOST TWO MILLENNIA AGAINST A NEWLY INVENTED CLAIM WITHOUT ANY HISTORICAL SUPPORT YOU ARE TRULY AN IDIOT. HA HA HA… SO YOU ARE DISTANCING YOURSELF FROM THAT TOMB. HA HA HA… YOU ARE A FOOL. YOU ARE DENYING WITHOUT GIVING AN ALTERNATIVE EXCEPT A CLAIM THAT YOU YOURSELF DOESN’T HOLD. HA HA HA….
[One that has more credence actually, dahil nga it is a grave of Christians and the name "Simon bar jonah" was written.]
WHO SAYS THAT THEY ARE CHRISTIANS? IF THEY ARE CHRISTIANS HOW COME THAT ROTTEN GUY IS NAMED ‘SIMON BAR JONAH’ AND NOT PETER? HA HA HA…. CHRISTIANS CALLED ST. PETER “PETER” NOT SIMON BAR JONAH. HA HAHA…
HOW COME THE CHRISTIANS ARE IGNORANT OF THAT TOMB? HA HA HA… NO HISTORICAL SUPPORT TO BACK IT UP. HA HA HA… ONLY FOOLS LIKE YOU WILL BELIEVE THAT. HA HA HA SEE, YOU YOURSELF IS AFRAID TO COMMIT ON THAT CLAIM. HA HA HA…
[As against a Roman grave found amongst pagans with an inscription na 'Petra".]
LIAR LIAR LIAR… WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THE INSCRIPTION IS NOT ‘PETRA’ BUT PETROS. HA HA HA…
[The Jerusalem tomb has more inclination to be true but even so, there is no surety that it is the grave of peter the disciple.]
YOU ARE INDEED AN IDIOT BECAUSE BOTH PROTESTANT AND CATHOLIC SCHOLARS REJECT SUCH A CLAIM. UNFORTUNATELY YOU ARE A MERE IDIOT AND NOT A REAL SCHOLAR. HA HA HA…
[Neither one can be definite.]
THE TOMB OF ST. PETER IN ROME IS DEFINITE. BECAUSE CLEMENT OF ROME WROTE ABOUT IT WAY BACK c. 96AD AND IT WAS SUPPORTED BY SERIES OF ANCIENT WRITERS. HA HA HA…. THE HISTORICAL SUPPORT FOR ROME IS SOLID AND CONSISTENT.
[But the mere fact na mayroong "mas probable" at "mas convincing" na grave, should be reason enough to doubt the veracity of the catholic claim.]
THAT IS VERY STUPID. THE TOMB OF ST. PETER IN ROME IS NOT PROBABLE BUT DEFINITIVE. IT WAS THE ONE AND ONLY CLAIMANT FOR ALMOST TWO THOUSAND YEARS, SUPPORTED BY EARLY CHRISTIAN WRITINGS AND BY PILGRIMAGE OF EARLY CHRISTIAN BELIEVERS. IT WAS THERE THAT ST. PETER WAS BEING HONORED BY CHRISTIANS EVER SINCE. THE DOUBT IS IN YOUR STUPID MIND. HA HAHA BUT ON OUR PART THE PROOFS ARE VERY VERY SOLID. THE ALTERNATIVE DOES NOT HAVE ANY IOTA OF HISTORICAL SUPPORT TO BACK IT UP. IT IS DELUSIONAL. HA HA HA
[Na-gets mo na?]
O YES. WE GOT HOW TRULY STUPID YOU ARE. HA HA HA… YOU ARE DENYING SOMETHING WELL-ESTABLISHED FOR THE SAKE OF SOMETHING THAT YOU YOURSELF REFUSE TO BELIEVE. YOU ARE TRULY A CERTIFIED IDIOT. HA HA HA…
