Quantcast
Channel: admin
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3780

DEBUNKING MR. JESSICA SANCHEZ ON ALLEGED TOMB OF ST. PETER IN JERUSALEM By Mihkael Ferrer

$
0
0
The Tomb of St. Peter underdeath the High Altar of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome

The Tomb of St. Peter underdeath the High Altar of St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome

Let’s see, I believe that a pile of bones in a tomb containing the words “Jesus son of Joseph” was also found in Jerusalem – something that atheists are using to debunk the Resurrection. Common sense will tell you that the inscription is a forgery (just look at how the inscription was carved out)Therefore, it doesn’t mean that there is a so-called “definitive” find of a “Simon bar Jonah” in Israel does it mean that it’s Peter (actually, though, I have never heard of such a find unless you believe in Dan Brown about the Church manipulating anything lol). Aside from that, there are many person named Simon who is also the son of a certain Jonah in Palestine as much are many are named Jesus and Joseph also.

Two of the zealot leaders who rebel against Rome during the destruction of Judea were also named Jesus and another as Judas! Haha so Jesus Christ died as a zealot in rebellion against Rome pala. -_- COMMON SENSE kung meron.

JC Sanchez · Works at HP
Try using the same “common sense” towards Rome’s claim.
Could there be ONLY ONE Peter who lived, died and was buried in Rome?Two orders of COMMON SENSE nga kung mayroon.
You didn’t even addressed any of my point Mr. Sanchez. *facepalm*. Perhaps because it is true that’s why you can’t refute it.There are no “two Peters” I said to begin with and yes there is only one Peter and that is in Rome and unanimous ang maraming mga experts diyan except the most heavily polemic Protestants and Arians like yourself – straw-man fallacy and plain empty claims. (speaking of which, I don’t understand fully your comment because it’s non-sense)

It is not just Rome’s claim, even secular and Orthodox scholars believe it. Where ever did you get that information (aloha.com???), it doesn’t make you any more reliable – in fact the opposite by many degree. Even the obelisk found in the Vatican Square that once stood in Circus Nero is greatly believed to have witnessed the death of Peter in the circus to begin with. The only way you can claim a “Peter in Palestine” is if you believe Dan Brown and conspiracists claiming that the Catholic Church is manipulating “everything in the world”.

PS: Light-heartedly. Did you know that the word “Dan Brown” is now tantamount to people and cases giving FALSE ACCURACY? Please don’t Dan Brown me ^^

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DanBrowned

JC Sanchez 
Mihkael Ferrer Okay, I will walk you slowly through your own mind’s maze. You proposed that there may be more than one “Jesus” buried in Jerusalem… the same way there could be more than one “Peter” buried the same way.Now I proposed that there may be more than one “Peter” buried in the crypts under the basilica… the same way there may be more than one “Simon” buried there also. 

That’s how simple my statement was really… for you to apply the same “common sense” on what the catholic church claims, using your proposition above. 
Get it now?

On a similar lighthearted note… there no Dan Brown-ery in what I’m telling people. If there were, it would be from one of the readers who thinks “code” words are basis for fact. (Examples, “Babylon” is code for “Rome”). I’d say “dumbass” is code for Arganiosa.

The Splendor of the Church 

JC Sanchez [I'd say "dumbass" is code for Arganiosa.]

YOU ARE THE HOLE AND THE CONTENT FLOWING FROM THAT CODE, MR. JESSICA SANCHEZ. HA HA HA…

JC Sanchez I am irked by your inability to understand – straw man also: Obviously, those are not Jesus Christ and hindi ako tanga diyan. So is a false tomb of a certain Jesus in Jerusalem – of which many scholar are simply ignoring the claim. And the other “Jesus” were clearly distinct persons and not THE Jesus of Nazareth. *irked*Now on Peter – nice try reversing, but as what many has accepted – scholars accept it, and early Christians, Church-fathers and ancient historians attest that Peter was indeed died and was buried in Rome – added point, he died in Circus Nero (where Vatican City is now outside the main city of Rome and the seven hills) because most of Rome had just burned down and so places for public execution within the city are down. None testified that he was in Palestine. And please, for heaven’s sake, do you not recognize forgery of inscriptions from real ones? Lead archaeologists may not all agree but they do not consider any claim of Peter in Rome as a forgery, and none accepts the possibility of having “other Peters” either, goodness….. as the basis of Peter’s place among the Tombs of the Vatican is not even inscription but archaeology, logic, relation to culture and common sense.

BTW, do remember, that the Greek and Aramaic of the name Peter (Petros or Kephas respectively) is NOT a common name in antiquity prior to Christianity making it popular. Yun lang naman.

Speaking, I’ve just read where this guys is getting the claim of an ossuary of Peter in Palestine – a cemetery below the church “Dominus Flevit”.

Oh let us see now. Among the tombs were the names Jesus, Judas, Joseph, Martha, Mariame, Mary, Mattheus and… well Simon bar Jonah. Whooppss! Wait, was Jesus Christ also buried here? And why the lack of the name Peter or Kephas specifically, instead Simon? 

Haven’t you wonder why scholars and archaeologists and almost all Catholics or even Protestants do not take this seriously. Yun lang ulit.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3780

Trending Articles