Quantcast
Channel: admin
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3780

RESPONSE TO ELI SORIANO’S PUPPET By Aloysius Kayiwa

$
0
0
  • download
    Mama Eli was so nervous Ha ha ha...

    Mama Eli was so nervous Ha ha ha…


    IMPROMPTU JANE ABAO BLEATS IN PAIN BECAUSE HER THUG LEADER SORIANO IS EXPOSED-BUT IMPROMPTU COMPLETELY MISSES THE WHOLE POINT! RESPONSE TO THE ATTACKS OF A DATING DAAN CULT MEMBER
    -By Aloysius Kayiwa

When someone is hurt, the option is either to keep quiet (if one is humble) or react. Now one member of the Dating Daan Cult did the latter after her thug cowardly leader Eli Soriano was exposed and refuted. The lady who made the attack is named Jane Abao in a blog article- I do not know her personally-but for defense’s, I will respond to her asseveration in a more articulate manner. I must say delusion is her tone but I also observed that truth is too painful for her and if she accuses me of not refuting what Soriano really said, I will accuse her missing the whole point in my article or still for committing the sin of omission.

Madam, when I wrote that article I didn’t write with a particular purpose to refute Soriano but I did that in the General sense so that even other false teachers misleading people are covered in the refutation and also that, many of our readers may learn. I know many false teachers, similar to the kind of Soriano, we have many here in Uganda- cultist groups similar to Soriano’s. Some have come and disappeared, but the Catholic Faith has grown and grown.

Since your attack on me was included in your generalized attack to Bro.Duane aka Lay Person Scripture and Fr.Abe Arganiosa, for purposes of clarity, I will only respond to the attack you made on me. I must however start by saying that i fear nothing from the likes of you and I must tell you that you are simply confused.

Let us break your asseveration down and expose why it doesn’t make logical sense.

“Aloysius Kayiwa Next came the August 12, 2014 post of Aloysius Kayiwa titled, REFUTING ELI SORIANO & HIS FELLOW FALSE PROPHETS ON THE DIVINITY OF CHRIST. This is part of the responses to Bro. Eli Soriano in Splendor of the Church blog of the Roman Catholic Church that for a long time has been Arganiosa’s turf. The blog is now tagged as Catholic Apologetics.”

Madame, I did not expect you to read my article but it is good anyway you read it. The SPLENDOR BLOG is a public blog and it is frequently NO. ONE in the Top Blog list ranking. Many people have found that blog useful and many people, whose souls were at a danger of being misled by your cult, were saved by this blog. Once again, many people have been converted by this blog including some from your sect. I myself have improved my Apologetics with the aid of this blog and that is why I chose to be its correspondent for Africa. There is nothing you can say about that.

“Kayiwa is not a Filipino. He is a Ugandan, a former Pentecostal, and a correspondent of Splendor in Africa.” Let me use this opportunity to explain more about myself. You are correct I am not a Filipino. Iam a Ugandan, direct from the Pearl of Africa-the Land of the Uganda Martyrs who were burnt alive by the pagan King Mwanga for refusing to renounce their faith in Jesus. Due to their martyrdom, that is why the Christian and in particular the Catholic faith is the dominant religion. The blood of our Heroic Uganda Martyrs is the seed of the Christian faith in Uganda.

Being a former Pentecostal is not a great deal for me. I reverted to the Catholic Church after being fed up by the lies and corrupt gospel of the Born Again Preachers including your own cult Dating Daan. As being a correspondent from Africa for the Splendor Blog, my role is to provide the blog with the happenings of the Catholic Church in Uganda and news about the New Religious Movements. I am also a blogger in the Splendor Blog, teaching and defending the faith.

“He posted a very thick discourse but the thickness is deceiving. He dwelt on many topics that Bro. Eli did not mention.”

Ha ha ha! Madame stop being self deceiving. You are changing the plot of my article and run the risk of reading more into what I wrote that what am actually trying to convey in it. Who is the devil who told you that thickness is deceiving? In reality, you are trying to down play my article inorder to elevate your cult and thug leader Soriano but that will not successful. Your false teacher Soriano writes poisonous articles with a corrupt gospel but what have they helped his followers other than misleading them? In them is contained fretting, deception, cynicism and hypnotism. What have you done to prevent that? Soriano’s writings are like slow dozes of poison, it is funny how you discredit my article in order to pass your attacks on me and shelve the false teachings of your leader. But let me tell you, there is no amount of deodorant and cosmetics you use that can cover the shame and rot in your thug leader. Shame on you!

May I remind, my article is being read by many and have found it useful as an Apologetics resource. If you want to label it as deceiving, then that is your delusion. Let me tell you, many people in the Philippines have requested the article to be translated in Tagalog so that ordinary Filipinos without a grasp of English can learn from it and understand the poison coming from the rotten saliva of your false teacher Soriano. As regards the topics I wrote about, it is but Two inter-connected Topics: The Nature of God and the Divinity of Christ.

It is so self deceiving for you to think I wrote about “many topics” which you even do not mention. In my article I explained the Nature of God and the Divinity of Christ with the intention of crushing the inaccurate and misleading methods your false teacher uses to explain about God. If you will interpreted those interconnected topics as being “many topics”, fine for you but don’t impose your narrow mindedness on me. I am not responsible for that delusion. When I wrote, I wrote in the general sense so that people can learn the larger issue but you are so dumb to realize that. Shame on you! The aim of writing is not for eloquence(although this is necessary) but conveying the truth, that is the aim of my writing and I will write thick articles so long as they convey truth-and as long as you label them like that but there is nothing you will do about that.

“Written at the top is the following:” “Going back at the school of the Fathers: St. Athanasius battle; nicea and the defence of the apostolic faith – the figure of Athanasius at the centre of the fight against the arian heresy. A fundamental question for Chistian experience, yesterday as today. Deepening awareness of the trinity and refuting the false teachers Eli Soriano and Iglesia ni Manalo.”

Mr. Kayiwa, if you are an apologist, you must know what to do. Process this thick thing in order to respond properly to the issues set forth by Bro. Eli Soriano. Bulk cannot daunt nor fool those with thinking minds. They will still examine what you are saying despite your much padding. If you were my student, I would ask you to re-write, cut off the first nine pages, and begin on Page 10. That is where you began to talk about Bro. Eli.”

Madame, did you try to ask yourself what was written at the top is? It was a Prologue revealing the background of my whole article. But you are too empty brained to realize that. Excuse me, you are not in position to tell me what to do. The light of my article is embedded in great study stemming from the Early Church. Your malicious nature is seen when you want me to avoid going deep in the truth so that the people will not be informed of the background and tradition of their beliefs which can be a basis to rebut. Do not impose that stupidity on me. If you have a thinking mind, use it to know that proof can be presented from deep within (from the deep glean of the oceans) and from various sources-I mean standard sources. You can examine, that is okay, but that does not affect the credibility of the evidence presented. In reality, you want me to avoid citing the writings of Church Fathers whom we owe our Faith because these are the great personalities that defended the Christian faith from heretics like your leader Soriano. SO YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO TELL ME WHAT TO DO. YOU CAN CONTINUE BELIEVING THE COMIC SHOW OF THE THUG SORIANO BUT OUR CHURCH FATHERS MEAN A LOT WHEN IT COMES TO DIGGING DEEP FROM THE TRUTH.

I will never be your student, stop hallucinating. Let me tell you Madame, you cannot teach me-do not be offended! The principle of teaching must be preceded by learning and you have far too much of the latter left to do before you are ready to teach me. There is no shame in that. We all have to start somewhere. However, when you presume that you are ready to teach someone, such as myself, that has been studying the Christian faith for about 27 years; you do come across as a bit presumptuous.

Actually, it goes deeper than that. You see, I have read the arguments of the very early church- the very early church that gave you your Bible and I have compared the mumblings of your kind with those of the Early Church Fathers on the same issues-my analysis is your heretical beliefs were refuted long ago by Church Fathers. Who are you that your 21st Century knowledge and understanding can compare with excessively heavenly intelligent Justin Martyr and Ignatius of Antioch and Polycarp and Jerome and Aquinas and Augustine?

“Remove extraneous material and do not force Catholic materials which have no credibility to others because they are not scriptures. For example, what does Bro. Eli care about your St. Athanasius, his battle and Nicea? Are they in the Bible? The Iglesia ni Manalo is also not included here. That surely is not the way to argue. Go simple and attack the issues presented and that is the pronouncements of the Pope.”

Excuse me Madame; you are not in position to tell me what to do. As I have told you, you can’t teach me and my Apologetics style does not depend on what you want me to do. You have found the chance of writing in a blog and you have become too excited to think you can tell me what to do! The “extraneous material” will not be removed-live with that fact and even eat your heart out. The stupidity in you is seen when you claim Church Father’s teaching have no credibility for others but I was not writing only to refute your false teachers but also to enable others learn-I mean our Catholic brothers and sisters and all those who may be concerned about the strange and usual teachings of Dating Daan.

I hear you say “because they are not scriptures” but let me pose this to you: If you insist that Apologetics/debate can only be premised on Scripture alone because you allege that Scripture is the only authority, I will insist that you provide scripture explicitly establishing that only the written word of God, as contained in a specific canon of books, can be accepted to the exclusion of all else?

The kinds of you look at the writings of the Church Fathers and Sacred Tradition as nothing but be reminded about this: My method of Apologetics method is not based only on Scriptures. When I debate or rebut, I do so via Scripture, history, tradition, practicality and logic. Your premise that debate can only be based on Scriptures alone is false and a logical fallacy called an “Argument from Ignorance”.

As fallacious and impossible as Sola Scriptura is, it is absolutely foundational to your way of thinking. That is because you have been ensnared in a logical spider web that you cannot break free from. Let me tell you, you will never succeed to prove “Bible alone” as the only premise to be used when debating. The burden of proof always lies with the person making an assertion. This is why “innocent until proven guilty” is such a foundational precept in our society.

Besides, Scripture itself, tells us that this notion is false.

2THES 2:15 Therefore, brothers, stand firm and hold fast to the traditions that you were taught, either by an oral statement or by a letter of ours.

Here, Paul is affirming both Written Scripture and Sacred Tradition. This refutes the idea held by the kinds of you that only Scripture alone is to used and establish the premise that Scripture is not exclusionary truth. Once again, you run the risk of reading more into what I am saying than what I am actually saying. To say that something is necessary but insufficient does not mean that two contradictory sources of truth can exist side by side.

Once again, you run the risk of reading more into what I am saying than what I am actually saying. To say that something is necessary but insufficient does not mean that two contradictory sources of truth can exist side by side.

  • “Like the others, you mention many things that are only true to you.”

    Like who others? Madame, you are becoming delusional. The things I mentioned are fundamental Christian beliefs. They were believed for 1500 years before your demonic sects and cults came about. Like I said, Dating Daan beliefs are US Centric, strange, unsusual and a remnant of 19th Century thinking and there is no doubt about that. These things I mention are fundamental Christian beliefs which were defended by the Church Fathers I alluded to in my article. St.Athanasius is the one who defended the Divinity of Christ against the Arian heretics. Actually, this St.Athanasius is the one who produced the Canon of the Bible you hold in your hands. Let me tell you, you are a parasite of Arius the Heretic, you are trying to divert us from telling the truth of what transpired in ancient times in a bid to cover up for your sects corrupt gospel.

    Let me warn you Madame, that will not work for you. The truth is that your beliefs from your thug organization are demonic and what I mention are fundamental Christian beliefs believed for 15 centuries before your thug organization came after and a result of Luther’s reformation. You Dating Daan sect has borrowed much from the devious teachings of Luther and his former heretic Arius, who even your fellow Protestants disowned as a heretics. Don’t you feel ashamed that your beliefs stem from the falsity of Arius and Luther? There’s nothing Christian about your Christ-deity rejecting cult.

    “ I will just show you some of what you said:”

    Madame, you are becoming pathetic. What I want from you is to challenge the whole content of my article. You are trying to sling my article and take portions out of context with the intention to mislead. But you will not succeed. I will clarify on all this and expose the malicious nature that is in you. Of course I know you are incapable of challenging the whole content because as you admitted: You are not expert on these things-there is no shame in that. Just Show us your confidence, challenge the whole article. For now you are not doing anything and I will show that here.

    In his first line, Soriano says that: “Now, if the son is equal to the Father and the Father is a spirit, it follows that the Son must also be a spirit!” This is a bogus statement confusing the nature of God and cancelling out Soriano. Notice how he confuses the Spirit to be the Father and the Son and not Himself. Soriano does not know what “equal” means and he confuses the nature of the one God and through misapplying and torturing Scriptures to support his erroneous views. If Jesus is also a Spirit like His Father as Soriano says, why does the Spirit come on him during Baptism by John the Baptist? “Resolution for this is a televised debate.”

    Madame, you do not know what you are talking about surely. Who told you this is a televised debate or was a televised debate? Who told you? Stop being self deceving. This was a blog post. Let me tell you, even if it was a televised debate, there is nothing we fear from the kinds of you. We have refuted all the Iglesia Ni Manalo Debaters in televised debates. These Iglesia debaters themselves defeated Ang Dating Daan debaters. Be assured, Madame, that there is nothing we fear-even on Televised Debate. The problem is that your debaters are afraid to engage us, including your thug coward false teacher Soriano. Just come out of your dens and debate us if you are confident. Tell your thug leader to come out from his den and prove the fallacies he accuses us in real debate. We (CFD Debaters) fear nothing! That is the writing on the wall for you and him.

    “When you go, try to repeat these lines you wrote and let us see if you can win.”

    There is no problem that.The fact that you are hurt already shows am a victor.Your remarks below show signs of a hurt and incompetent person. Ha ha ha! Do I care any way?

    “ I am not an expert on these things but I have already learned something from Bro. Eli that is not in you.”

    HAHAHA! This to me is old wives tales. There is no shame in admitting your in-expertise. I must say you are sincere in your search for God but you are simply confused by Soriano. Your thug leader has infused a lot of poison in you, you have learned from him falsity and easy believism which make nonsense. When you tell me such empty statements like these, my thoughts go back to the experience of St.Augustine, who also said things like those while still in the cult of Mani-very much in fashion like your Dating Dung cult;

    AUGUSTINE

    “You know that the only reason we found ourselves among men like those was that they said that once one abandons the authority that breeds fear, with pure and simple reason they would have led to God and freed from every error whoever would listen. For what was driving me to follow and listen so diligently to such men for almost nine years….who would not be seduced by such promises? Particulary the soul of an adolescent longing for the truth, made even more proud and loquacious by the conversions in the school of learned men, they found me thus at that time; full of scorn what seemed to me old wives tales and longing to draw and posses the clear and genuine truth they promised”(Augustine,De Utilitate Credendi 1,2)

    Augustine continues:

    “I reasoned and deliberated greatly with myself, not whether I should continue in that sect, into which I was sorry that I had fallen……I began to prefer the Catholic doctrine because I found it more balanced and absolutely sincere, in prescribing a faith without demonstrations, that at times are there, but far not….Under your working and patient hand, Lord now my heart slowly too form…..”(Confessions VI,5,7)

    Do you see that conversion Madame? That is what impresses me. I do not get impressed at your cheap and simplistic remarks. I learn from the best minds throughout history-men who were exceedingly wise than you and your Eli Soriano and all members of Dating Daan cult combined!

    “You suffer from the negative effect of drinking from loads of lies. “

    And you suffer from the negative of believing a thug false teacher and obeying him like a willing slave. Let me tell you, unsubstantiated claims are not truth and do not affect me. You are shying away from the real issues. If they are loads of lies as you claim, then show us your intelligence and challenge them. Resolve that the Holy Spirit is not Person in ONE GOD-separate from the Father and the Son? Over to you. That is what I was expounding in the article-The Nature of God.

    “Just from believing all those so-called saints and making them your gods already deceive your minds.” Ha ha ha! Madame, you are getting stupid in unsubstantiated claims. If you think we make our Saints gods, then you are living in a world of delusion and deception which is but a big lie. Everyone of course can see that these are unsubstantiated claims and are nonsense. This to me is straw man arguments. You are diverting from the real issues and that weakens your points. You think that by talking that way I will be hurt? Ha ha ha! I have experienced such crap many times from the kinds of you-they do not affect me. Those who tell me such empty talk have left disappointed because they are refuted.

    Besides, has your cult ever produced any Saint? Do you have Saints in your cult? No one. Yet you are accusing us for having Saints, the righteous of God. These Saints mean a lot to us Catholics as Role Models together with Jesus.

    Before you can accuse Catholics, make sure you know what you are talking about. First, I think it is important for you to define what “veneration” means. So many times, non-Catholics like you have a way of redefining what a word means to make a false implication, a straw man.

    When looking at the Saints, we venerate them and veneration simply means to show honor and respect for those who gave their lives to God in heroic fashion. I have always enjoyed reading the lives of the Saints who are our role models. Adoration, which is known as latria, is the worship and homage that is rightly offered to God alone. That is the highest act of reverence and worship. Veneration is also known as dulia, which is the honor and reverence appropriately due to the excellence of a created person. In other words a Saint.

    Jesus has something to say about the saints in heaven, He said, “The children of this age marry and remarry, but those who are deemed worthy to attain to the coming age and to the resurrection of the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. They can no longer die, for they are like angels; and they are the ones who will rise. That the dead will rise even Moses made known in the passage about the bush, when he called ‘Lord’ the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob; and he is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive.” (Luke 20;27, 34-38) The souls who are saved already share in eternal happiness as they await for the resurrection of the dead when the soul and the body will be reunited. The risen body will have a glorified state of being and we will be like Jesus. St. Paul writes, “What eye has not seen, and ear has not heard, and what has not entered the human heart, what God has prepared for those who love him.” (1 Corinthians 2:9)

    I really like St. Paul’s writing, 1 Corinthians 9:24-25 states, “Do you not know that the runners in the stadium all run in the race, but only one wins the prize? Run so as to win. Every athlete exercises discipline in every way. They do it to win a perishable crown, but we an imperishable one.” What a great gift from God that we have those role models who point the way to God by their example and lives. That is as simple as it gets why we honor the Saints. You don’t do in your dating Daan cult yet you accuse us of making these beloved of God our role models. Shame on you!

    The Bible teaches us to invoke those in heaven and ask them to pray with us. Consider Psalms 103, we pray, “Bless the Lord, O you his angels, you mighty ones who do his word, hearkening to the voice of his word! Bless the Lord, all his hosts, his ministers that do his will!” (Palms. 103:20-21). And in Psalms 148 we pray, “Praise the Lord! Praise the Lord from the heavens, praise him in the heights! Praise him, all his angels, praise him, all his host!” (Palms. 148:1-2).

    Madame, for Catholics, the real answer to give to those who wants you to think that the Catholic Church idolize Saints is that the Church had always valued the prayer and the memory of the Saints. Maybe the idea of praying to the Saints is a bit strong for the likes of Jane Abao so I like the idea of praying with the Saints who intercede on our behalf in their praises to God. In our human nature, we are always looking for heroes. Football’s hall of fame is located everywhere. The Catholic Hall of Fame is located in Heaven. Just as we honor some of the great sports legends and war heroes, we especially honor those who lived for God and are in Heaven.

    James 5:16 states in part, “The fervent prayer of a righteous person is very powerful”, those in heaven at the throne of God has very important prayers offered up for us.

    Hebrews 12:1 is the kicker, “Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us rid ourselves of every burden and sin that clings to us and persevere in running the race that lies before us…”

    Madame you need to style up and reason like a grown up. You need to learn from a Quaker turned Catholic who he asked his protestant gentleman friend this question;

    “When does faithfulness to Jesus call us to lay aside our biases and when does it call us to stand beside them?” His answer to me was that it is not about being Catholic or Protestant. It is about being faithful to Jesus. The issue is not about which church you go to, it is about following Jesus where He leads you.”

    “Your thinking is veiled whereas God’s truth is simple – for those who are not idol worshippers.”

    Don’t be silly Madame. Well, that is your opinion but is nothing more than unsubstantiated nonsense. I think you do not have anything else to talk about than unsubstantiated claims. Because you will have to prove who is an idol worshipper? Does respect for saints equate to idol worshippers? Madame, you need to go back to school and study well otherwise the idiotic reasoning Soriano infused in you is already apparent here. You really have a lot to do before you can teach me surely if you think that unsubstantiated claims can convince me. Just go to the brightest minds and tell them that Saints honor equate to idol worship and you will see what they will tell you. Such cheap talk is spewed by other cults including Jehovah’s Witness, Seventh Day Adventist,Iglesia Ni Manalo-real cults and we know the reason why they spew such cheap talk-to steal sheep from the Catholic Church.

    Don’t you feel ashamed that you share the same mentality with other religious cults? Your false charges won’t work Madame. You are just shooting yourself in the chest. Let me tell you; First, a word about idols- in the general sense and in the specific Biblical sense. In the general sense, an idol is anything that detracts someone’s attention from God. In the broadest sense, the TV can be an idol or your smartphone or facebook or even your career. All of these things have the possibility of becoming too large of a focus in your life, to the detriment of your relationship with God. In that way they become, in a literary sense, idols. That is to say, they are unhealthy distractions.

    I think you are being deliberately deceptive or simply do not properly understand the concepts of idols and worship. The main reason for this is that one of the out-growths of the protestant reformation is a new and different brand of worship that differs starkly from the Old and New Testament models which make you completely miss the whole point. Biblically you need to look at the Scriptures and consider the evidence of all these verses and passages: 1 Kings 2, Psalm 45, Revelation 5, Revelation 8, Revelation 11:19-12:17.

     
     
  • “Another one – So Soriano gets it wrong in confusing the Spirit as being the Father and the Son. The Spirit is God himself – God the Holy Spirit. When the Church asks us to bow our heads on hearing the words of John; ‘The Word became fresh [sic] and dwelt among us,’ She is calling us to pray homage to the goodness of God Who loves man so much as to become, Himself, the Messiah He had promised to the Hebrews – the Messiah who would be at one and same time, God and man. This falls under the same thinking, the same error. Try to mention this again in the debate so that you can see why you are not correct. But this one below is what you really have to prove. Let us see who among you and Bro. Eli is the “charlatan pretending to be wise.”

    Madame, you are caught here. What don’t you see ? Do you see how you concealed content from my article? You committed a fallacy known as SIN OF OMISSION. You clearly concealed content that is associated with that quote-it is clear for me and those who read the article properly. Actually you concealed the whole section and slinged what you thought would suit your deception. This devious trick is utilized by other Cults like Jehovah’s Witnesses and the SDA.The intention is to mislead people and pass on a message I did not intend to present. The line you have quoted above is the last part of the section in my article-BUT HOW CAN THERE BE THREE PERSONS IN ONE GOD?

    You clearly concealed a large chunk of information that clearly proves Soriano wrong in no uncertain terms. Do you deny that? Lol! This devious trick utilized by you is amazingly apparent and has been easily detected. Like the Dating Daan, you cautiously articulated biased and one dimensional arguments in your favor with the intent to omit pertinent and truthful information. Due to this biased writing style, it impossible for the reader to make a wise decision on an unclear teaching and move forward with the real truth. Your slanted and cynical remarks are irrelevant and incomplete by deliberately concealing truthful evidence. You have even avoided the real issues I addressed in that section. Did you attempt to challenge the whole content in that section? Well, we can see who a charlatan pretending to be wise is now. You and Soriano are real charlatans. How will your readers acquire full knowledge through only seeing one side of the evidence?

    “Prove yourself! Before you spread your heresies from Uganda to the Philippines, stand up and be measured!”

    HA HA HA! Well, I already proved myself. I already proved that Soriano is a charlatan pretending to be wise. Now I have proved how deceptive and deluded you are. You need to stand up and be measured now. Actually it is not spreading lies from Uganda, it is showing that the poison and hallucination of Eli Soriano has been already detected in Uganda and no one will believe his deception. We, in Uganda, have already known the poison and hallucination of Soriano. Simple as that!

    “This is your statement – Enter in Soriano – a charlatan pretending to be wise It is dishearting [sic] that although the Church Fathers sacrificed their lives to defend the fundamental Christian Faith against heretics, new false teachers, which the Scriptures warn us about, are coming up with wrong teachings. One of them is Eli Soriano, the founder of Ang Dating Daan cult aka Church of God International in the Philippines. Soriano has no shame in torturing, misapplying Scriptures and fooling people. In one of his latest articles in his blog, he accuses Pope Francis of calling Jesus a man by arguing with cynical statements that Jesus is a Spirit because God the Father is Spirit quoting John 4:24 which forces him to argue that – “Now, if the son is equal to the Father and the Father is a spirit, it follows that the Son must also be a spirit!” In reality, Soriano does not know what he is arguing against. A ‘straw man’ argument defines a person’s point of view inaccurately, and then attacks the misrepresentation… “

    Aloysius Kayiwa, what you are accusing Bro. Eli of, is actually what you are doing! “

    Complete my statement Madame? Once again you are committing a Sin of Omission here. I really sympathize with you. You concealed prior content and also the proceeding lines from my article. Prior content in my article expounds on the History of the Arian heresy, which Soriano and Iglesia Ni Manalo adopted and are somehow resurrecting. Proving this, here is a link where Soriano teaches that: The Jesus and Christ of the Bible is not God the Father-a pure Arian concept!

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/439884/The-Jesus-Christ-of-the-Bible-is-Not-God-the-Father

    I hope you will see it was necessary for me to expound on the origin of this heresy so that people can be informed where this heresy Soriano and his other false prophets are spewing. But the fact that you concealed that content shows the malicious nature that is in you.

    Yes Madame, through deliberately omitting truthful information, you presented biased and ad hominem views imbued with cynical attacks to support erroneous teachings of Eli Soriano in order to mislead readers. From the evidence provided, it is logical for one to individually read my article and research beneficial information, rather than await biased writings void of all the facts from the kinds of you and Dating Daan.

    “Your claims are based on a cache of your saints and relics. Those are not found in the Bible! If you agree to a debate, that “charlatan pretending to be wise” can be uncovered. I guarantee, that is you!”

    That has been already talked about above. The Bible is not exclusive of other sources of faith and truth and Saints honor is indeed provable from the Bible. You are too ignorant to see that. Everyone has already seen that you are indeed real charlatans pretending to be wise when you pass on demonic teachings from your cult, sin of omission, Ad hominems, fallacy of arguing from Ignorance and straw mans arguments. Your hypnotically language patterns prove you further to be a charlatan pretending to be wise. Your carefully crafted language patterns in your attack were used to deceptively influence innocent and unarmed readers. This trick is also employed in Dating Daan literature. Hypnotic language overtly and covertly programs the minds of loyal Dating Daan followers, influencing through obvious words seen consciously right on the page.

    To Catholics reading this, mark this. Hypnotic writings undoubtedly work on the subconscious mind by using the conscious mind to get there. The Dating Daan cult has been experimenting and playing with mind power from the very beginning and the persuasive tactic of hypnotic writing has obviously worked. Hypnotic writing is without question the most effective method of retaining members. Through clever sentence structure associated with ambiguous Scriptures, the Dating Daan entrances their followers into these hypnotic writings known as persuasive flattery. Through this devious tactic, an unsuspecting reader is forced to accept all else that is said from the Dating Daan, and to disagree with what is said would be admitting they do not really love the Lord. But once exposed to the Dating Daan bag of tricks, they become blatantly obvious.

    “But have we forgotten what Bro. Eli was saying about Pope Francis? No! When you began your arguments with a human being (St. Athanasius) rather than God, you were building on shaky ground. Your understanding then is veiled.”

    Well, I already showed your idiotic mind that you missed the whole point of the message my article was presenting. My background to the refutation of Soriano and his other fellow false prophets confused you. Like the article begins, “To understand the heresy (which Soriano and his other false prophets are resurrecting), we must go back to origins of the controversy (for deeper synthesis), which are closed entwined with the life of Athanasius. That is why St.Athanasius came into the whole Article. You are too narrow minded to realize this. Do you know what? St.Athanasius is the Catholic Church’s champion against this Arian heresy which your Soriano and his fellow cultist groups are promoting with some how different collars. St.Athanasius was far more educated and learned and holy than your coward Eli Soriano and yourself can compare. Ha ha ha! It is so interesting that you are siding with heretics like Arius and Soriano rather than those who defended fundamental Christian beliefs before even your cults came into existence.

    My understanding is correct and well informed and there is no idiocy from your mind that can change that fact. Yours is simply a licking of Soriano’s tail and breastfeeds from Soriano’s cohorts and poison. Soriano’s unrelentless criticism of others should be of concern to Dating Daan Members like you. “Indeed, some people are not searching for truth nor are thinking anymore. Some prefer to drink from a cache of lies passed on from their forebears.” These are just cynical statements and another trick employed by religious cults-called un-relentless criticism.

    Besides do not be a hypocrite, we know the false and demonic lies from your cult. Look here, according to Mr. Soriano, faith in the death, burial and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ is insufficient to save a person; but in addition, Soriano and his cult followers teach that keeping all of God’s commandments are required for salvation.

    Ha ha ha ha!! Hehehehe! This is known as the heresy of “laws-salvation.” Shared by other cults like SDA.Soriano also demonically teaches: “The Jesus and Christ of the Bible is not God the Father.” Wow!! Madame, do you question these lies from your leader? Ha ha ha!

    The Bible calls Soriano a liar.

    In Isaiah 9:6 we read a prophecy concerning the Messiah… Isaiah 9:6, “For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.”

    Madame, God already has the number for your cult and it is the 666! Your cynical statements simply won’t work Madame. On a greater level, this clever trick is used to convince Dating Daan members that the Ang Dating Daan is the “truth” and all other religions are false. ADD’s literature and broadcast is an overly redundant barrage of cynical and negative comments suggesting disgust in all other religious faiths. The Dating Daan continually expresses severe judgments on all other religions as well as verbally attacking personalities. This never ending criticism elevates the Dating Daan cult and enrobes its members with a haughty and cocky confidence. This is the very formula this cult uses to induce an ungodly and non-Biblical elitism within their members.

    Further, even though the Dating Daan accuses the Catholic Church of fallacy, it is actually the Dating Daan that exhibits fallacious logic which is infused in the subconscious minds of Dating Daan members. This clever trick is used to convince ADD members that the Dating Daan is the “truth” and all other religions are false. In reality, ADD broadcasts and literature is an overly redundant barrage of cynical and negative comments. The Dating Daan cult is masterful through their use of fallacious statements. ADD members undeniably accept all the teachings and doctrines within the cult because the teachings appear to be reasonable, acceptable and truthful. However, the cult’s teachings are like a flawed product disguised by impressive packaging. Although these teachings appear truthful, they are embodied in fallacy with a deliberate attempt to mislead. The Dating Daan literature is saturated with these fallacious statements in which the error is not obvious. Eli Soriano uses this to masterfully deceive, trick, control and manipulate his followers.

    Our readers, stay tuned to this blog to discover more from the Dating Daan bag of tricks. Next up will be my response to Darwin Bajo,another ADD member who tried to attack me in guise of rebutting. Strange enough, his method is that of throwing ambiguous Scriptures taken out of context to try to prove a point. But there is no worry, I will put the Scriptures he presented back into context and his exposure will be obvious.

    Do not let clear thinking be swamped by these semantics and devious teachings falsely presented as the “established truth” and “of God”, -they are not true in the real sense, they are the fanciful falsehoods of human imaginations of Eli Soriano and are specific statements that manipulate the actions of members like this Jane Abao. They never are truth, they are lies promoted in the name of God to seek cheap popularity and a following. The Dating Daan is nothing more than a dangerous and destructive cult masquerading as a religion.

    “But if you read the latest pronouncements of the Pope, they show that even he has not stopped thinking and is for changes. In the Pope’s interview with Eugenio Scalfari, La Repubblica’s founder (www.repubblica.it, 2013/10/01), the Pope was talking about how the Roman Catholic Church should change. In his exact words, he said there is “The leprosy of the papacy.” The Pope was using a metaphor, of course, but he is in effect saying that not everything is all right with the Roman Catholic Church.”

    So what Madame? I will respond this with a conclusion Pope Francis wrote in his preliminary reply to Scalfari;

    “Dear Dr. Scalfari, I conclude my reflections, which are a response to your thoughts and questions. Please receive them as a preliminary reply, but one which is sincere and full of hope, along with the invitation to walk this path together. The Church, despite all of the sluggishness, infidelities, errors and sins that are committed and are still being committed by her members, has no other meaning or purpose than to live and witness to Jesus: he who has been sent by Abba, “to preach good news to the poor, to proclaim release to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord” (Lk 4:18-19). -Pope Francis, Letter to Mr. Scalfari, 4 Sep 2013)

    Besides do not be a hypocrite Madame. Empirically Protestants have more leprosy than Catholics. I can prove that if you want me to do. This is not an argument boast but a fact. Make no mistake about that. And as long as you want to attack us, we shall respond in equal measure. I mean we shall respond even with greater force. We are qualified for that. There is no doubt about that.

    EUGENIO SCALFARI-AN ATHEIST’S PREJUDICE, OUR FREEDOM Let me also use this opportunity to explain to our readers who Scalfari is. He is an atheist, in short a Non-believer. Scalfari does not believe in God but nevertheless as the Pope says “who for many years has been interested in and fascinated by the preaching of Jesus of Nazareth”. I came to know about him in the 1999s through the Communion and Liberation magazines. Like Soriano, he is another coward who tries to distract the Catholic Church in Italy. The only message for Scalfari is one:

    We belong to the Church that through a charism associated with the emergency of Pope Francis, has not renounced its appeal to reason and freedom and thus reveals itself open to all the interests of life. Representatives of the secular world like Scalfari, instead of belonging or observing this phenomenon note a passion for a reason and for freedom that they feel familiar and close to their most authentic inspirations. Reason is not to be confused with opinions generated by and infused with prejudice. And freedom is not to be confused with the pharisaical rhetoric of libertinism, which, extolling transgressiveness, ends up being integrated with those in power.

    We are a Church that precisely through the freedom of Jesus has swelled a new life with the emergency of Pope Francis. What strikes us most is that all those who belong to the Church without pre-conceptions, is just this open humanity of which the Church is the gathering place for all consciences, whatever the color of their skin and the ideas that they bring. CHRIST FOR ALL! Yesterday, today and tomorrow!


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3780

Trending Articles