![1-Ka Felix youth]()
![ellen-g.-white-312x350]()
Ang Pekeng Anghel at Demoniong 666 na si Felix Manalo at ang Babaeng Impakta si Ellen “666″ Gould White.
ANTI CATHOLIC: O ito ang katunayan na ang KAPAPAHAN ang siyang HAYOP na binabanggit sa Apokalipsis, O ito, tunghayan mo tanga!
VICARIUS FILII DEI
666, The Number of the Beast
FR. ABE: Well, these agents of the Beast and the other beasts are becoming bitter and bitter in their posts. He, he, he… They are so angry that that very insulting personal attacks are being employed. I decided to erase the others because it doesn’t suit even their bestiality and animality, and preserved only the term ‘tanga’ which is pointed at me as ‘stupid’. Since I do not claim great erudition I can accept the limitation of my intellect. And since this anonymous poster claim that I am such it is therefore presuppose that he is intelligent while I am not. Good for him… Let us see how intelligent he is.
Now, about VICARIUS FILII DEI = 666.
Once again, it is a proven fact that there is NO ‘Vicarius Filii Dei’ on the Tiara of the Pope. That lie was invented by the Seventh Day Adventists and used also by the Iglesia ni Manalo. Their researchers have admitted that there is indeed no such text written on the crown of the Pope yet their very intelligent puppies are parrotting it until now to deceive the Catholics to transfer to their newly founded religions.
It means they are swallowing their own INVENTION. This is the classic case of invented lies they drilled into their heads so that later on that lie got a semblance of truth on the liars. The deceivers are now enjoying the effect of their own lies and their lies made them pregnant with self-delusion, and self-delusion gave birth to self-deception.
Their level of intelligence is indeed proven to be very high. It is as high as a Giraffe and is proper for a very high Giraffe. I raise my glass to their renown intellectual capacity.
——————————————————————————–
ANTI CATHOLIC: Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
FR. ABE: Obviously, this intelligent giraffe is not aware that the Servants of God also have mark, a seal on their FOREHEADS:
Rev 7:3 [KJV] ‘Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have SEALED the SERVANTS OF OUR GOD in their FOREHEADS.’
Dream on.
ANTI CATHOLIC: Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
FR. ABE: This is more appropriate for the followers of Manalo and Ellen Gould White who used to count and to number their own followers. The INC even prohibits its followers to give charity to their non-members. They are so-exclusive. They believe that only their members will be saved.
ANTI CATHOLIC: Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
FR. ABE: NAME OF A MAN OR IN TAGALOG ‘TAO’ [Human Person]. The beast is a human person. For example, Felix Y. Manalo or Ellen Gould White. These are names of human person.
Note that according to verse 17, there are three different characteristics that distinguish the beast:
1. His mark (of authority)
The INC and SDA also have authority. They are even more authoritarian. In INC only Manalos are serving as leaders while the SDA their worship is exclusive on Saturdays. So, before pointing at others please look at your own sala and dining room. He, he, he…
2. His name
Yes, name… NAME. His name like Felix Manalo, Iraneo Manalo, Eduardo Manalo. Or ‘her’ name… ELLEN GOULD WHITE. Very easy application isn’t it? But, if you will refer it to the Pope what will you get? Nothing because it is not a name of a man or of a human person. Unless you will accuse the famous poet ALEXANDER POPE as the Anti-Christ. Not even the Popemobile can fit the description. Ha ha ha…
3. The number of his name (666).
It fits again because THE NAME OF FELIX Y. MANALO and IRANEO MANALO and ELLEN GOULD WHITE are proven to be equal to 666. Perfectly fitting to these modern day demons.
ANTI CATHOLIC: It might be argued by some that 666 must be applied to one man’s name, and that this will then help identify him as the antichrist. I would offer the following verse to show that 666 need not apply solely to a man’s name:
Rev 19:16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.
FR. ABE: It doesn’t fit and your use of Rev 19:16 doesn’t disprove the fact that the 666 is the name of the person. The verse that you quoted refers to Jesus as King of Kings and Lord of Lords. It doesn’t state that Felix Manalo and Ellen Gould White are not the 666. Besides, this is your claim: “I would offer the following verse to show that the 666 NEED NOT apply solely to a man’s name”. Sorry for you, because THERE IS NO STATEMENT IN REV 19:16 THAT SHOWS ‘The 666 need not apply solely to a man’s name.” Where is that in the text? None. He, he, he…
That is another hallucination once again.
ANTI CATHOLIC: The same Greek word translated as name (onoma: G3686) that appears in Revelation 13:17-18 is also used in chapter 19:16, so clearly the word can also apply to a title, and not just one man’s name. Now, we are told that it takes a certain understanding and wisdom to discern just how this number is actually applied. Based on the fact that 666 can apply to a title, below are several words and phrases that have been put forth over the centuries as probable solutions to the enigma of 666.
FR. ABE: The problem with your position is this. Rev 19:16 does not refer to a title but to a Name. It means that the phrase KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS is a Name of the Lord God:
Exodus 15:3 [KJV] “The Lord is a warrior; THE LORD is HIs NAME.”
The term Lord is a Name of God. Thus Lord of Lords is a Name of God as well as King of Kings. There is no statement there that they are mere titles. They are Divine Names and Divine Attributes. So, THERE IS NO ESCAPE FOR THE NAMES OF YOUR FOUNDERS: FELIX Y. MANALO AND ELLEN G. WHITE.
ANTI CATHOLIC:
GREEK
The numeric equivalents of Greek letters can also be found in the Encyclopedia Britannica under “Languages of the World”, Table 8.
The ancient Greek word for “the Latin speaking man” is LATEINOS
FR. ABE: O, you have found another invented tactic to discredit the Catholic Church ha. Let us see if it is effective.
ANTI CATHOLIC:
L = 30 lambda
A = 1 alpha
T = 300 tau
E = 5 epsilon
I = 10 iota
N = 50 nu
O = 70 omicron
S = 200 sigma
————
666
FR. ABE: BRAVO, YOUR CALCULATOR IS VERY EFFICIENT. He, he, he….
ANTI CATHOLIC:
NOTE: Latin is the official language of the Roman Catholic Church. Church Documents are usually published first in Latin, and then translated from the Latin into other languages. The association of “Lateinos” with 666 was first suggested by Irenæus (ca. 130-202 A.D.) who proposed in his Against Heresies that it might be the name of the fourth kingdom in Daniel 7:7.
FR. ABE: Latin is the language of the Roman Christians because it was the language of the people of Rome. So, I thought that you are SOLA SCRIPTURA now you are distorting the work of Irenaeus just to feed your lies. He, he, he…
First, THE BIBLE DOESN’T SPEAK OF 666 AS PEOPLE, OR GROUP, OR CHURCH THAT SPEAKS LATIN AS ITS OFFICIAL LANGUAGE. If it is in the Bible then show me. Chapter and Verse please.
Second, Rev 13:18 DOES NOT MENTION OF LATEINOS BUT OF A NAME OF A MAN: PANGALAN NG TAO. So, your effort to cover the demonic identity of your founder by presenting a LANGUAGE is not effective at all. Better luck next time. SAPUL PA RIN SI MANALO AT SI ELLEN G. WHITE. He, he, he…
Third, Irenaeus also refers to a NAME not to LANGUAGE. This is clear in the text of the Wikipedia:
ANTI-CATHOLIC:
666
Irenaeus is the first of the church fathers to consider the mystic number 666. While Irenaeus did propose some solutions of this numerical riddle, his interpretation was quite reserved. Thus, he cautiously states: “But knowing the sure number declared by Scripture, that is six hundred sixty and six, let them await, in the first place, the division of the kingdom into ten; then, in the next place, when these kings are reigning, and beginning to set their affairs in order, and advance their kingdom, [let them learn] to acknowledge that he who shall come claiming the kingdom for himself, and shall terrify those men of whom we have been speaking, have a name containing the aforesaid number, is truly the abomination of desolation.“[44] Although Irenaeus did speculate upon three NAMES to symbolize this mystical number, namely Euanthas, Teitan and Lateinos, nevertheless he was content to believe that the Antichrist would arise some time in the future after the fall of Rome and then the meaning of the number would be revealed[45 Against Heresies Book 5 Chapter 30, sec. 3]
FR. ABE: Irenaeus clearly refers to NAMES, such as Euanthas, Teitan and Lateinos. Yet, you demonically distorted it by pointing to the OFFICIAL LANGUAGE of the Catholic Church which is NOT LATEINOS BUT ‘LATIN’.
Are you blind? Don’t you see the DIFFERENCE between LATIN and LATEINOS. Ha, ha, ha… Your effort is PATHETIC. In Tagalog, kahabag-habag at kalunos-lunos ang iyong KATANGAHAN. Ha, ha, ha… Besides, Irenaeus is a Bishop and Martyr of the Catholic Faith. He is a French Bishop of the Catholic Church. Definitely he was not referring to the Catholic Church. Much more, THE NAME LATEINOS IS NOT LATIN BUT GREEK. Ha, ha, ha… Nakakaawa ang iyong katalinuhan. Is that what you’ve learned from Ellen Gould White and Felix Y. Manalo? MAGKASING-TANGA KAYO.
ANTI CATHOLIC: Then also Lateinos has the number six hundred and sixty-six; and it is a very probable [solution], this being the name of the last kingdom [of the four seen by Daniel]. For the Latins are they who at present bear rule: I will not, however, make any boast over this [coincidence].
FR. ABE: Definitely it doesn’t fit our Catholic Church… It’s name is not Lateinos but THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. Your claim about the official language of the Church doesn’t hold any water or crude oil because LATEINOS IS GREEK AND NOT LATIN and it doesn’t refer to the Latin speaking Christians. Don’t you know that the First complete translation of the Bible in one Language is in LATIN?
–
Posted By Fr. Abe to The Splendor of the Church at 11/23/2009 11:45:00 AM
