The Blessed Virgin Mary as The Immaculate Conception
GOD as FATHER – “I AM WHO AM”
GOD as SON – “before abraham was “I AM”
GOD as MOTHER – “I AM THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION”
WRONG. THE MEANING OF IMMACULATE CONCEPTION IS NOT PURITY BUT PURIFIED BEFORE BIRTH. SO MARY WAS PURIFIED BY GOD AND SHE IS NOT GOD.
[Si GOD lang po ang PURITY.]
ONLY GOD IS PURITY ITSELF. MAMA MARY IS NOT PURITY BUT PURIFIED FROM CONCEPTION. MAMA MARY IS NOT PURITY BUT IMMACULATELY CONCEIVED.
[Take note of the word "I AM", nagpapahiwatig ng isang kahiwagaan tungkol kay Maria.]
HA HA HA… MAMA MARY DIDN’T SAY “I AM THE BREAD OF LIFE” “BEFORE ABRAHAM WAS I AM”. MAMA MARY ONLY SAID “I AM THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION”. MEANING SHE IS A HUMAN BEING CLEANSED BY GOD AND NOT GOD HERSELF.
THESE HERETICS ARE BECOMING DELUSIONAL.
GOD as SON - "before abraham was "I AM"]
THESE TWO DECLARATION WAS GIVEN BY THE HOLY SPIRIT IN THE SACRED SCRIPTURES AND THEREFORE THEY ARE DIVINELY REVEALED TRUTH.
[GOD as MOTHER - "I AM THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION"]
DEMONIC. HERETICAL.
THAT STATEMENT OF MAMA MARY DOESN’T MEAN SHE IS GOD BUT SHE IS A HUMAN PERSON PURIFIED BY GOD BY MAKING HER FULL OF GRACE. BESIDES, THAT STATEMENT OF MAMA MARY IN LOURDES CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH THE ‘I AM WHO AM” OF GOD THE FATHER AND THE “I AM” OF JESUS. BECAUSE THAT STATEMENT IS NOT WRITTEN IN SACRED SCRIPTURES. A CATHOLIC CAN STILL BE CATHOLIC WITHOUT BELIEVING THE LOURDES APPARITION BECAUSE IT IS NOT A PUBLIC REVELATION BUT A MERE PRIVATE REVELATION. APPARITIONS, EVEN THOUGH APPROVED OFFICIALLY, ARE NOT THE BASIS OF DOGMA BUT THE SACRED SCRIPTURES AND THE APOSTOLIC TRADITION OF THE CHURCH.
THESE ADHERENTS OF MARY IS GOD HERESY ARE BECOMING MORE HERETICAL EACH TIME THEY PRESENT THEIR TEACHING.